Cargando…

Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map

Obstetric fistula is prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, with between 50,000 and 100,000 new cases each year. The World Health Organization aims to eradicate it by 2030 but a clear idea of the extant evidence is unavailable. This evidence map compiled evidence on treatments for obstetric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne, O’Connor, Nicole, Hilton, Paul, Pearson, Fiona, Goh, Judith, Vale, Luke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36963005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001481
_version_ 1784908576629719040
author Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne
O’Connor, Nicole
Hilton, Paul
Pearson, Fiona
Goh, Judith
Vale, Luke
author_facet Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne
O’Connor, Nicole
Hilton, Paul
Pearson, Fiona
Goh, Judith
Vale, Luke
author_sort Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne
collection PubMed
description Obstetric fistula is prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, with between 50,000 and 100,000 new cases each year. The World Health Organization aims to eradicate it by 2030 but a clear idea of the extant evidence is unavailable. This evidence map compiled evidence on treatments for obstetric fistula to identify potential knowledge gaps. The protocol for this work was published on the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H7J35). A survey was developed, piloted and distributed online through organisations with an interest in obstetric fistula and snowballing. Results informed the evidence map framework. Searches were run on MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus and ScanMedicine on 16 February 2022 to identify potentially eligible systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies. Forward and backward citation chaining was undertaken on relevant systematic reviews and included studies. Studies were screened, coded and assessed for risk of bias by a single reviewer, with a second checking a proportion. The evidence map results were compared to survey results. Thirty-nine people responded to the survey, half of which were clinicians. Of 9796 records identified, 37 reports of 28 studies were included in the evidence map. Many included studies were at some risk of bias; for observational studies, this was predominantly due to lack of controlling for confounders. Most studies (71%) assessed surgical interventions alone. Reporting on other intervention types was limited. Regarding outcome measures most important to survey respondents, 24 studies reported on cure/improvement in obstetric fistula and 20 on cure/improvement in urinary incontinence. Reporting on quality of life, faecal incontinence and sexual function was limited. There is currently little robust evidence to guide patients and practitioners on the most effective treatment option for obstetric fistula. Further research is required to address evidence gaps identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10021774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100217742023-03-17 Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne O’Connor, Nicole Hilton, Paul Pearson, Fiona Goh, Judith Vale, Luke PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article Obstetric fistula is prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, with between 50,000 and 100,000 new cases each year. The World Health Organization aims to eradicate it by 2030 but a clear idea of the extant evidence is unavailable. This evidence map compiled evidence on treatments for obstetric fistula to identify potential knowledge gaps. The protocol for this work was published on the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H7J35). A survey was developed, piloted and distributed online through organisations with an interest in obstetric fistula and snowballing. Results informed the evidence map framework. Searches were run on MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus and ScanMedicine on 16 February 2022 to identify potentially eligible systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies. Forward and backward citation chaining was undertaken on relevant systematic reviews and included studies. Studies were screened, coded and assessed for risk of bias by a single reviewer, with a second checking a proportion. The evidence map results were compared to survey results. Thirty-nine people responded to the survey, half of which were clinicians. Of 9796 records identified, 37 reports of 28 studies were included in the evidence map. Many included studies were at some risk of bias; for observational studies, this was predominantly due to lack of controlling for confounders. Most studies (71%) assessed surgical interventions alone. Reporting on other intervention types was limited. Regarding outcome measures most important to survey respondents, 24 studies reported on cure/improvement in obstetric fistula and 20 on cure/improvement in urinary incontinence. Reporting on quality of life, faecal incontinence and sexual function was limited. There is currently little robust evidence to guide patients and practitioners on the most effective treatment option for obstetric fistula. Further research is required to address evidence gaps identified. Public Library of Science 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10021774/ /pubmed/36963005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001481 Text en © 2023 Johnson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne
O’Connor, Nicole
Hilton, Paul
Pearson, Fiona
Goh, Judith
Vale, Luke
Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map
title Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map
title_full Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map
title_fullStr Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map
title_short Interventions for treating obstetric fistula: An evidence gap map
title_sort interventions for treating obstetric fistula: an evidence gap map
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36963005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001481
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsoneugenieevelynne interventionsfortreatingobstetricfistulaanevidencegapmap
AT oconnornicole interventionsfortreatingobstetricfistulaanevidencegapmap
AT hiltonpaul interventionsfortreatingobstetricfistulaanevidencegapmap
AT pearsonfiona interventionsfortreatingobstetricfistulaanevidencegapmap
AT gohjudith interventionsfortreatingobstetricfistulaanevidencegapmap
AT valeluke interventionsfortreatingobstetricfistulaanevidencegapmap