Cargando…
Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives
The COVAX program aims to provide global equitable access to life-saving vaccines. Despite calls for increased sharing, vaccine protectionism has limited progress towards vaccine sharing goals. For example, as of April 2022 only ~20% of the population in Africa had received at least one COVID-19 vac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312 |
_version_ | 1784908578783494144 |
---|---|
author | Shivam, Shashwat Weitz, Joshua S. Wardi, Yorai |
author_facet | Shivam, Shashwat Weitz, Joshua S. Wardi, Yorai |
author_sort | Shivam, Shashwat |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVAX program aims to provide global equitable access to life-saving vaccines. Despite calls for increased sharing, vaccine protectionism has limited progress towards vaccine sharing goals. For example, as of April 2022 only ~20% of the population in Africa had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Here we use a two-nation coupled epidemic model to evaluate optimal vaccine-sharing policies given a selfish objective: in which countries with vaccine stockpiles aim to minimize fatalities in their own population. Computational analysis of a suite of simulated epidemics reveal that it is often optimal for a donor country to share a significant fraction of its vaccine stockpile with a recipient country that has no vaccine stockpile. Sharing a vaccine stockpile reduces the intensity of outbreaks in the recipient, in turn reducing travel-associated incidence in the donor. This effect is intensified as vaccination rates in a donor country decrease and epidemic coupling between countries increases. Critically, vaccine sharing by a donor significantly reduces transmission and fatalities in the recipient. Moreover, the same computational framework reveals the potential use of hybrid sharing policies that have a negligible effect on fatalities in the donor compared to the optimal policy while significantly reducing fatalities in the recipient. Altogether, these findings provide a self-interested rationale for countries to consider sharing part of their vaccine stockpiles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10021782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100217822023-03-17 Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives Shivam, Shashwat Weitz, Joshua S. Wardi, Yorai PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article The COVAX program aims to provide global equitable access to life-saving vaccines. Despite calls for increased sharing, vaccine protectionism has limited progress towards vaccine sharing goals. For example, as of April 2022 only ~20% of the population in Africa had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Here we use a two-nation coupled epidemic model to evaluate optimal vaccine-sharing policies given a selfish objective: in which countries with vaccine stockpiles aim to minimize fatalities in their own population. Computational analysis of a suite of simulated epidemics reveal that it is often optimal for a donor country to share a significant fraction of its vaccine stockpile with a recipient country that has no vaccine stockpile. Sharing a vaccine stockpile reduces the intensity of outbreaks in the recipient, in turn reducing travel-associated incidence in the donor. This effect is intensified as vaccination rates in a donor country decrease and epidemic coupling between countries increases. Critically, vaccine sharing by a donor significantly reduces transmission and fatalities in the recipient. Moreover, the same computational framework reveals the potential use of hybrid sharing policies that have a negligible effect on fatalities in the donor compared to the optimal policy while significantly reducing fatalities in the recipient. Altogether, these findings provide a self-interested rationale for countries to consider sharing part of their vaccine stockpiles. Public Library of Science 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10021782/ /pubmed/36962897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312 Text en © 2022 Shivam et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shivam, Shashwat Weitz, Joshua S. Wardi, Yorai Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
title | Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
title_full | Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
title_fullStr | Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
title_short | Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
title_sort | vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shivamshashwat vaccinestockpilesharingforselfishobjectives AT weitzjoshuas vaccinestockpilesharingforselfishobjectives AT wardiyorai vaccinestockpilesharingforselfishobjectives |