Cargando…

Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)

BACKGROUND: Ageing poses a huge challenge to the Chinese social welfare system. However, a national long-term care (LTC) instrument has not been established yet. This study aimed to analyse and compare the content of six selected LTC instruments based on the linkage of the International Classificati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Yan, Zhao, Jingpu, Liu, Xiangxiang, Xie, Xiaohua, Wang, Yulong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03824-2
_version_ 1784908615099875328
author Gao, Yan
Zhao, Jingpu
Liu, Xiangxiang
Xie, Xiaohua
Wang, Yulong
author_facet Gao, Yan
Zhao, Jingpu
Liu, Xiangxiang
Xie, Xiaohua
Wang, Yulong
author_sort Gao, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ageing poses a huge challenge to the Chinese social welfare system. However, a national long-term care (LTC) instrument has not been established yet. This study aimed to analyse and compare the content of six selected LTC instruments based on the linkage of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to provide a content reference from a functioning perspective for the development of a Chinese national LTC instrument. METHODS: Two trained health professionals performed the linkage analysis according to the refined ICF linking rules. The main concepts included in the items of three international LTC instruments, namely Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0), Initial Assessment Instrument (IAI), and New Assessment Tool for Determining Dependency on Nursing Care (NBA), as well as three Chinese instruments, namely Disability Assessment of Long-Term Care (DA-LTC), Specification for Elderly Care Unified Need Assessment in Shanghai Version 2.0 (SEC-UNA 2.0), and pictorial-based Longshi Scale (LS), were selected and linked to the ICF categories. The six selected LTC instruments were analysed and compared at the levels of ICF components, chapters, and categories. RESULTS: The main concepts of 340 items of the six LTC instruments were linked to 112 different ICF categories. Within the ICF framework, the ‘Activities and Participation’ component was most frequently addressed in the LTC instruments, followed by ‘Body functions’, at 52% and 38%, respectively. At the chapter level, ‘b1 mental functions’, ‘d4 mobility’, and ‘d5 self-care’ were addressed by the majority of LTC instruments. CONCLUSION: The ICF provides a general reference for the analysis and comparison of different LTC instruments. The findings indicate that all LTC instruments focused on older adults’ physical needs; however, various important issues regarding their psychological and social participation needs were not addressed. Specific for China, the core elements of LTC instruments varied, and the ICF chapters ‘b1’, ‘d4’, and ‘d5’ are recommended to develop a national uniform one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10021930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100219302023-03-18 Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) Gao, Yan Zhao, Jingpu Liu, Xiangxiang Xie, Xiaohua Wang, Yulong BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Ageing poses a huge challenge to the Chinese social welfare system. However, a national long-term care (LTC) instrument has not been established yet. This study aimed to analyse and compare the content of six selected LTC instruments based on the linkage of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to provide a content reference from a functioning perspective for the development of a Chinese national LTC instrument. METHODS: Two trained health professionals performed the linkage analysis according to the refined ICF linking rules. The main concepts included in the items of three international LTC instruments, namely Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0), Initial Assessment Instrument (IAI), and New Assessment Tool for Determining Dependency on Nursing Care (NBA), as well as three Chinese instruments, namely Disability Assessment of Long-Term Care (DA-LTC), Specification for Elderly Care Unified Need Assessment in Shanghai Version 2.0 (SEC-UNA 2.0), and pictorial-based Longshi Scale (LS), were selected and linked to the ICF categories. The six selected LTC instruments were analysed and compared at the levels of ICF components, chapters, and categories. RESULTS: The main concepts of 340 items of the six LTC instruments were linked to 112 different ICF categories. Within the ICF framework, the ‘Activities and Participation’ component was most frequently addressed in the LTC instruments, followed by ‘Body functions’, at 52% and 38%, respectively. At the chapter level, ‘b1 mental functions’, ‘d4 mobility’, and ‘d5 self-care’ were addressed by the majority of LTC instruments. CONCLUSION: The ICF provides a general reference for the analysis and comparison of different LTC instruments. The findings indicate that all LTC instruments focused on older adults’ physical needs; however, various important issues regarding their psychological and social participation needs were not addressed. Specific for China, the core elements of LTC instruments varied, and the ICF chapters ‘b1’, ‘d4’, and ‘d5’ are recommended to develop a national uniform one. BioMed Central 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10021930/ /pubmed/36932339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03824-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gao, Yan
Zhao, Jingpu
Liu, Xiangxiang
Xie, Xiaohua
Wang, Yulong
Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
title Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
title_full Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
title_fullStr Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
title_full_unstemmed Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
title_short Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
title_sort content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (icf)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03824-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoyan contentcomparisonoflongtermcareinstrumentsbasedontheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicf
AT zhaojingpu contentcomparisonoflongtermcareinstrumentsbasedontheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicf
AT liuxiangxiang contentcomparisonoflongtermcareinstrumentsbasedontheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicf
AT xiexiaohua contentcomparisonoflongtermcareinstrumentsbasedontheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicf
AT wangyulong contentcomparisonoflongtermcareinstrumentsbasedontheinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicf