Cargando…

COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY

INTRODUCTION: All malignancies, including prostate cancer, require accurate diagnosing and staging before making a treatment decision. The introduction of targeted biopsies based on prostate MRI findings has raised prostate biopsy accuracy. Guided biopsies target the tumor itself during the biopsy i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pezelj, Ivan, Pirša, Matea, Svaguša, Ivan, Nikles, Sven, Tomić, Miroslav, Knežević, Matej, Tomašković, Igor, Krušlin, Božo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10022403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938557
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.4
_version_ 1784908723785826304
author Pezelj, Ivan
Pirša, Matea
Svaguša, Ivan
Nikles, Sven
Tomić, Miroslav
Knežević, Matej
Tomašković, Igor
Krušlin, Božo
author_facet Pezelj, Ivan
Pirša, Matea
Svaguša, Ivan
Nikles, Sven
Tomić, Miroslav
Knežević, Matej
Tomašković, Igor
Krušlin, Božo
author_sort Pezelj, Ivan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: All malignancies, including prostate cancer, require accurate diagnosing and staging before making a treatment decision. The introduction of targeted biopsies based on prostate MRI findings has raised prostate biopsy accuracy. Guided biopsies target the tumor itself during the biopsy instead of the most common tumor sites as is the case with a systemic biopsy. Some studies report that targeted biopsies should lower prostate cancer biopsy undergrading and overgrading. GOALS: To determine the incidence of prostate cancer biopsy undergrading in patients who underwent a classic systemic biopsy compared to patients who underwent a mpMRI cognitive targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified the patients from our database who underwent a radical prostatectomy at our institution from January 1st, 2021, to June 30th, 2021.There were 112 patients identified. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the type of biopsy that confirmed prostate cancer. The mpMRI (N=50) group had a mpMRI cognitive guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy performed, and the non-mpMRI group (N=62) received a classic, systemic TRUS biopsy. We compared the biopsy results with the final pathological results, and searched for undergrading or overgrading in the biopsies compared to the final histological report. RESULTS: The undergrading was found in 17,7% (N=11) cases in the non-mpMRI group and in 12,0% (N=6) of cases in the mpMRI group (p=0,02, Mann-Whitney U test). No overgrading was found in our cohort. All cases of undergrading had Grade Group 1 in the biopsy report and Grade Group 2 in the final specimen report. The charasteristics of patients are listed in Table 1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In our cohort, the patients who underwent a mpMRI targeted biopsy had a lower undergrading incidence. During a systemic TRUS biopsy, the urologist targets the areas of the prostate where cancer is most commonly located, which is usually the peripheral zone of the prostate. Since different areas of the tumor have different areas of differentiation, only a low-grade part of the tumor is sometimes biopsied, which results in a sampling error. Once the prostate is removed, the whole tumor is analyzed, so the obtained pathological results related to the removed prostate are far more accurate than the analysis of prostate cores obtained by biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10022403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100224032023-03-18 COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY Pezelj, Ivan Pirša, Matea Svaguša, Ivan Nikles, Sven Tomić, Miroslav Knežević, Matej Tomašković, Igor Krušlin, Božo Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers INTRODUCTION: All malignancies, including prostate cancer, require accurate diagnosing and staging before making a treatment decision. The introduction of targeted biopsies based on prostate MRI findings has raised prostate biopsy accuracy. Guided biopsies target the tumor itself during the biopsy instead of the most common tumor sites as is the case with a systemic biopsy. Some studies report that targeted biopsies should lower prostate cancer biopsy undergrading and overgrading. GOALS: To determine the incidence of prostate cancer biopsy undergrading in patients who underwent a classic systemic biopsy compared to patients who underwent a mpMRI cognitive targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified the patients from our database who underwent a radical prostatectomy at our institution from January 1st, 2021, to June 30th, 2021.There were 112 patients identified. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the type of biopsy that confirmed prostate cancer. The mpMRI (N=50) group had a mpMRI cognitive guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy performed, and the non-mpMRI group (N=62) received a classic, systemic TRUS biopsy. We compared the biopsy results with the final pathological results, and searched for undergrading or overgrading in the biopsies compared to the final histological report. RESULTS: The undergrading was found in 17,7% (N=11) cases in the non-mpMRI group and in 12,0% (N=6) of cases in the mpMRI group (p=0,02, Mann-Whitney U test). No overgrading was found in our cohort. All cases of undergrading had Grade Group 1 in the biopsy report and Grade Group 2 in the final specimen report. The charasteristics of patients are listed in Table 1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In our cohort, the patients who underwent a mpMRI targeted biopsy had a lower undergrading incidence. During a systemic TRUS biopsy, the urologist targets the areas of the prostate where cancer is most commonly located, which is usually the peripheral zone of the prostate. Since different areas of the tumor have different areas of differentiation, only a low-grade part of the tumor is sometimes biopsied, which results in a sampling error. Once the prostate is removed, the whole tumor is analyzed, so the obtained pathological results related to the removed prostate are far more accurate than the analysis of prostate cores obtained by biopsy. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10022403/ /pubmed/36938557 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Pezelj, Ivan
Pirša, Matea
Svaguša, Ivan
Nikles, Sven
Tomić, Miroslav
Knežević, Matej
Tomašković, Igor
Krušlin, Božo
COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
title COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
title_full COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
title_short COMPARISON OF GRADING ACCURACY OF PROSTATE CANCER IN SAMPLES ACQUIRED BY A TARGETED AND SYSTEMIC PROSTATE BIOPSY
title_sort comparison of grading accuracy of prostate cancer in samples acquired by a targeted and systemic prostate biopsy
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10022403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938557
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.4
work_keys_str_mv AT pezeljivan comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT pirsamatea comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT svagusaivan comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT niklessven comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT tomicmiroslav comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT knezevicmatej comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT tomaskovicigor comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy
AT kruslinbozo comparisonofgradingaccuracyofprostatecancerinsamplesacquiredbyatargetedandsystemicprostatebiopsy