Trauma After Cochlear Implantation: The Accuracy of Micro–Computed Tomography and Cone-Beam Fusion Computed Tomography Compared With Histology in Human Temporal Bones

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), in conjunction with the image fusion technique, may provide similar results for trauma assessment after cochlear implantation, with respect to the trauma evaluation in preclinical cochlear implant (CI) studies, as the histology. BACKGROUND: Before clinical use, novel cochlear implant (CI) designs are tested in temporal bone (TB) studies for usability and risk evaluation. The criterion standard for evaluating intracochlear insertion trauma and electrode location has historically been with histological samples. Progress of modern imaging technology has created alternatives to classic histology. This study compares the micro-CT and CBCT fusion images between histological samples in a preclinical CI study. METHODS: Fourteen freshly frozen TBs were inserted with a lateral wall research CI electrode. All TBs were scanned with CBCT preoperatively and postoperatively. After insertion, the TBs were prepared for micro-CT and histology. Twelve TBs underwent first a micro-CT and then the histological process. The CBCTs were used for image fusion, and all three different methods were used for intracochlear trauma evaluation. The results were compared between methods. RESULTS: There were 4 of 14 translocations detected with the fusion image method and 3 of 12 with the micro-CT and histology. When compared, the trauma grades converged and were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The trauma grading based on micro-CT is comparable to the histology. The image fusion technique based on CBCT is less accurate because it relies on an empirical assumption of the basal membrane localization, but it is clinically applicable.