Cargando…
Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration
Introduction: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938240 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35058 |
_version_ | 1784908851767672832 |
---|---|
author | MacNeille, Rhett Lay, Johnson Razzouk, Jacob Bogue, Shelly Harianja, Gideon Ouro-Rodrigues, Evelyn Ting, Caleb Ramos, Omar Veltman, Jennifer Danisa, Olumide |
author_facet | MacNeille, Rhett Lay, Johnson Razzouk, Jacob Bogue, Shelly Harianja, Gideon Ouro-Rodrigues, Evelyn Ting, Caleb Ramos, Omar Veltman, Jennifer Danisa, Olumide |
author_sort | MacNeille, Rhett |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follow-up to ensure the resolution of the infection without recurrence and/or progression of neurologic deficits. No previous study has looked specifically at follow-up in the SEA population, but the review of the literature does show evidence of varying degrees of difficulty with follow-up for this patient population. Methods: This retrospective review looked at follow-up for 147 patients with SEA at a single institution from 2012 to 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups of surgical versus non-surgical patients and those with adequate versus inadequate follow-up. Results: Sixty-two of 147 (42.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with their surgical team, and 112 of 147 (76.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with infectious disease (ID). The primary statistically significant difference between patients with adequate versus inadequate follow-up was found to be surgical status with those treated surgically more likely to have adequate follow-up than those treated non-operatively. Conclusion: Improved follow-up in surgical patients should be considered as a factor when deciding on surgical versus non-operative treatment in the SEA patient population. Extra efforts coordinating follow-up care should be made for SEA patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10023045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100230452023-03-18 Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration MacNeille, Rhett Lay, Johnson Razzouk, Jacob Bogue, Shelly Harianja, Gideon Ouro-Rodrigues, Evelyn Ting, Caleb Ramos, Omar Veltman, Jennifer Danisa, Olumide Cureus Infectious Disease Introduction: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follow-up to ensure the resolution of the infection without recurrence and/or progression of neurologic deficits. No previous study has looked specifically at follow-up in the SEA population, but the review of the literature does show evidence of varying degrees of difficulty with follow-up for this patient population. Methods: This retrospective review looked at follow-up for 147 patients with SEA at a single institution from 2012 to 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups of surgical versus non-surgical patients and those with adequate versus inadequate follow-up. Results: Sixty-two of 147 (42.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with their surgical team, and 112 of 147 (76.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with infectious disease (ID). The primary statistically significant difference between patients with adequate versus inadequate follow-up was found to be surgical status with those treated surgically more likely to have adequate follow-up than those treated non-operatively. Conclusion: Improved follow-up in surgical patients should be considered as a factor when deciding on surgical versus non-operative treatment in the SEA patient population. Extra efforts coordinating follow-up care should be made for SEA patients. Cureus 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10023045/ /pubmed/36938240 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35058 Text en Copyright © 2023, MacNeille et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Disease MacNeille, Rhett Lay, Johnson Razzouk, Jacob Bogue, Shelly Harianja, Gideon Ouro-Rodrigues, Evelyn Ting, Caleb Ramos, Omar Veltman, Jennifer Danisa, Olumide Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration |
title | Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration |
title_full | Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration |
title_fullStr | Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration |
title_short | Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration |
title_sort | patients follow-up for spinal epidural abscess as a critical treatment plan consideration |
topic | Infectious Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938240 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macneillerhett patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT layjohnson patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT razzoukjacob patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT bogueshelly patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT harianjagideon patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT ourorodriguesevelyn patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT tingcaleb patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT ramosomar patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT veltmanjennifer patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration AT danisaolumide patientsfollowupforspinalepiduralabscessasacriticaltreatmentplanconsideration |