Cargando…
Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al.
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad013 |
| _version_ | 1784908885267578880 |
|---|---|
| author | Schwartz, Carolyn E Rapkin, Bruce D |
| author_facet | Schwartz, Carolyn E Rapkin, Bruce D |
| author_sort | Schwartz, Carolyn E |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-10023221 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-100232212023-03-18 Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. Schwartz, Carolyn E Rapkin, Bruce D JNCI Cancer Spectr Editorial Oxford University Press 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10023221/ /pubmed/36790077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad013 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
| spellingShingle | Editorial Schwartz, Carolyn E Rapkin, Bruce D Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. |
| title | Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. |
| title_full | Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. |
| title_fullStr | Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. |
| title_short | Double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of Lord-Besson et al. |
| title_sort | double-blinded is not better than “mutually enlightened”: implications of lord-besson et al. |
| topic | Editorial |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad013 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schwartzcarolyne doubleblindedisnotbetterthanmutuallyenlightenedimplicationsoflordbessonetal AT rapkinbruced doubleblindedisnotbetterthanmutuallyenlightenedimplicationsoflordbessonetal |