Cargando…

Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples

Background and study aims The contamination level of ready-to-use endoscopes published in the literature varies from 0.4 % to 49.0 %. Unfortunately, the comparison and the interpretation of these results are quite impossible, given the limited number of samples and sites included and the differences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pineau, Lionel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1991-1391
_version_ 1784908890926743552
author Pineau, Lionel
author_facet Pineau, Lionel
author_sort Pineau, Lionel
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims The contamination level of ready-to-use endoscopes published in the literature varies from 0.4 % to 49.0 %. Unfortunately, the comparison and the interpretation of these results are quite impossible, given the limited number of samples and sites included and the differences observed between sampling, culturing methods, and interpretation criteria. Methods The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the results of 90,311 endoscope samples collected between 2004 and 2021 in 490 private or public hospitals in France. Results Through the full test period, the mean ratio of endoscopes at the action level was 12.6 % (19.5 % including alert level). Of the endoscopy units, 23.0 % had a ratio of compliant endoscopes ≤ 70.0 %. The overall microbial quality of gastroscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes is improving year by year, whereas an opposite trend is observed for ultrasound endoscopes and bronchoscopes. In 2021, following French guidelines, 13.0 % of the endoscopes should have been quarantined and 8.1 % were at the alert level, meaning that the contamination level of 21.1 % of the endoscopes exceeded what was defined as a maximum acceptable value. Conclusions This study demonstrates that additional efforts, including implementation of microbial surveillance strategies using a standardized sampling method and periodic observational audits, must be made to improve the overall microbiological quality of endoscopes and reduce the risk associated with their use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10023244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100232442023-03-18 Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples Pineau, Lionel Endosc Int Open Background and study aims The contamination level of ready-to-use endoscopes published in the literature varies from 0.4 % to 49.0 %. Unfortunately, the comparison and the interpretation of these results are quite impossible, given the limited number of samples and sites included and the differences observed between sampling, culturing methods, and interpretation criteria. Methods The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the results of 90,311 endoscope samples collected between 2004 and 2021 in 490 private or public hospitals in France. Results Through the full test period, the mean ratio of endoscopes at the action level was 12.6 % (19.5 % including alert level). Of the endoscopy units, 23.0 % had a ratio of compliant endoscopes ≤ 70.0 %. The overall microbial quality of gastroscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes is improving year by year, whereas an opposite trend is observed for ultrasound endoscopes and bronchoscopes. In 2021, following French guidelines, 13.0 % of the endoscopes should have been quarantined and 8.1 % were at the alert level, meaning that the contamination level of 21.1 % of the endoscopes exceeded what was defined as a maximum acceptable value. Conclusions This study demonstrates that additional efforts, including implementation of microbial surveillance strategies using a standardized sampling method and periodic observational audits, must be made to improve the overall microbiological quality of endoscopes and reduce the risk associated with their use. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10023244/ /pubmed/36937825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1991-1391 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Pineau, Lionel
Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_full Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_fullStr Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_full_unstemmed Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_short Endoscope reprocessing: Retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
title_sort endoscope reprocessing: retrospective analysis of 90,311 samples
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1991-1391
work_keys_str_mv AT pineaulionel endoscopereprocessingretrospectiveanalysisof90311samples