Cargando…
Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
INTRODUCTION: Bone typing is crucial to enable the choice of a suitable implant, the surgical technique, and the evaluation of the clinical outcome. Currently, bone typing is assessed subjectively by the surgeon. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to establish an automatic quantification method to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.08.011 |
_version_ | 1784908913721737216 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Hairong Chen, Dong Lippuner, Kurt Hunziker, Ernst B. |
author_facet | Huang, Hairong Chen, Dong Lippuner, Kurt Hunziker, Ernst B. |
author_sort | Huang, Hairong |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Bone typing is crucial to enable the choice of a suitable implant, the surgical technique, and the evaluation of the clinical outcome. Currently, bone typing is assessed subjectively by the surgeon. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to establish an automatic quantification method to determine local bone types by the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for an observer-independent approach. METHODS: Six adult human cadaver skulls were used. The 4 generally used bone types in dental implantology and orthodontics were identified, and specific Hounsfield unit (HU) ranges (grey-scale values) were assigned to each bone type for identification by quantitative CBCT (qCBCT). The selected scanned planes were labelled by nonradiolucent markers for reidentification in the backup/cross-check evaluation methods. The selected planes were then physically removed as thick bone tissue sections for in vitro correlation measurements by qCBCT, quantitative micro–computed tomography (micro-CT), and quantitative histomorphometry. RESULTS: Correlation analyses between the different bone tissue quantification methods to identify bone types based on numerical ranges of HU values revealed that the Pearson correlation coefficient of qCBCT with micro-CT and quantitative histomorphometry was R = 0.9 (P = .001) for all 4 bone types . CONCLUSIONS: We found that qCBCT can reproducibly and objectively assess human bone types at implant sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10023581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100235812023-03-19 Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Huang, Hairong Chen, Dong Lippuner, Kurt Hunziker, Ernst B. Int Dent J Scientific Research Report INTRODUCTION: Bone typing is crucial to enable the choice of a suitable implant, the surgical technique, and the evaluation of the clinical outcome. Currently, bone typing is assessed subjectively by the surgeon. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to establish an automatic quantification method to determine local bone types by the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for an observer-independent approach. METHODS: Six adult human cadaver skulls were used. The 4 generally used bone types in dental implantology and orthodontics were identified, and specific Hounsfield unit (HU) ranges (grey-scale values) were assigned to each bone type for identification by quantitative CBCT (qCBCT). The selected scanned planes were labelled by nonradiolucent markers for reidentification in the backup/cross-check evaluation methods. The selected planes were then physically removed as thick bone tissue sections for in vitro correlation measurements by qCBCT, quantitative micro–computed tomography (micro-CT), and quantitative histomorphometry. RESULTS: Correlation analyses between the different bone tissue quantification methods to identify bone types based on numerical ranges of HU values revealed that the Pearson correlation coefficient of qCBCT with micro-CT and quantitative histomorphometry was R = 0.9 (P = .001) for all 4 bone types . CONCLUSIONS: We found that qCBCT can reproducibly and objectively assess human bone types at implant sites. Elsevier 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10023581/ /pubmed/36182605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.08.011 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Research Report Huang, Hairong Chen, Dong Lippuner, Kurt Hunziker, Ernst B. Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title | Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full | Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_short | Human Bone Typing Using Quantitative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_sort | human bone typing using quantitative cone-beam computed tomography |
topic | Scientific Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.08.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huanghairong humanbonetypingusingquantitativeconebeamcomputedtomography AT chendong humanbonetypingusingquantitativeconebeamcomputedtomography AT lippunerkurt humanbonetypingusingquantitativeconebeamcomputedtomography AT hunzikerernstb humanbonetypingusingquantitativeconebeamcomputedtomography |