Cargando…

Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The connectivity between somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical plasticity remains elusive due to a lack of supporting data. This study investigates changes in pathological latencies and amplitudes of SEPs caused by an acute stroke after 2 weeks of rehabilitation with functio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mijic, Marko, Schoser, Benedikt, Young, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06561-3
_version_ 1784908925948133376
author Mijic, Marko
Schoser, Benedikt
Young, Peter
author_facet Mijic, Marko
Schoser, Benedikt
Young, Peter
author_sort Mijic, Marko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The connectivity between somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical plasticity remains elusive due to a lack of supporting data. This study investigates changes in pathological latencies and amplitudes of SEPs caused by an acute stroke after 2 weeks of rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation (FES). Furthermore, changes in SEPs and the efficacy of FES against foot drop (FD) stroke symptoms were correlated using the 10-m walk test and foot–ankle strength. METHODS: A randomised controlled two-period crossover design plus a control group (group C) was designed. Group A (n = 16) was directly treated with FES, while group B (n = 16) was treated after 2 weeks. The untreated control group of 20 healthy adults underwent repeated SEP measurements for evaluation only. RESULTS: The repeated-measures ANOVA showed a decrease in tibial nerve (TN) P40 and N50 latencies in group A after the intervention, followed by a decline in non-paretic TN SEP in latency N50 (p < 0.05). Moreover, compared to groups B and C from baseline to 4 weeks, group A showed a decrease in paretic TN latency P40 and N50 (p < 0.05). An increase in FD strength and a reduction in step cadence in group B (p < 0.05) and a positive tendency in FD strength (p = 0.12) and step cadence (p = 0.08) in group A were observed after the treatment time. The data showed a moderate (r = 0.50–0.70) correlation between non-paretic TN latency N50 and step cadence in groups A and B after the intervention time. CONCLUSION: The FES intervention modified the pathological gait in association with improved SEP afferent feedback. Registered on 25 February 2021 on ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier number: NCT04767360. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-06561-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10023639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100236392023-03-19 Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial Mijic, Marko Schoser, Benedikt Young, Peter Neurol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The connectivity between somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical plasticity remains elusive due to a lack of supporting data. This study investigates changes in pathological latencies and amplitudes of SEPs caused by an acute stroke after 2 weeks of rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation (FES). Furthermore, changes in SEPs and the efficacy of FES against foot drop (FD) stroke symptoms were correlated using the 10-m walk test and foot–ankle strength. METHODS: A randomised controlled two-period crossover design plus a control group (group C) was designed. Group A (n = 16) was directly treated with FES, while group B (n = 16) was treated after 2 weeks. The untreated control group of 20 healthy adults underwent repeated SEP measurements for evaluation only. RESULTS: The repeated-measures ANOVA showed a decrease in tibial nerve (TN) P40 and N50 latencies in group A after the intervention, followed by a decline in non-paretic TN SEP in latency N50 (p < 0.05). Moreover, compared to groups B and C from baseline to 4 weeks, group A showed a decrease in paretic TN latency P40 and N50 (p < 0.05). An increase in FD strength and a reduction in step cadence in group B (p < 0.05) and a positive tendency in FD strength (p = 0.12) and step cadence (p = 0.08) in group A were observed after the treatment time. The data showed a moderate (r = 0.50–0.70) correlation between non-paretic TN latency N50 and step cadence in groups A and B after the intervention time. CONCLUSION: The FES intervention modified the pathological gait in association with improved SEP afferent feedback. Registered on 25 February 2021 on ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier number: NCT04767360. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-06561-3. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10023639/ /pubmed/36544079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06561-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Mijic, Marko
Schoser, Benedikt
Young, Peter
Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
title Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials—a crossover randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06561-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mijicmarko efficacyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationinrehabilitatingpatientswithfootdropsymptomsafterstrokeanditscorrelationwithsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsacrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schoserbenedikt efficacyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationinrehabilitatingpatientswithfootdropsymptomsafterstrokeanditscorrelationwithsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsacrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT youngpeter efficacyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationinrehabilitatingpatientswithfootdropsymptomsafterstrokeanditscorrelationwithsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsacrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial