Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures

To compare the stability and biomechanical characteristics of four commonly used triangular osteosynthesis techniques to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical application reference. Finite element models of Tile C-type pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis II sacral fractu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yupeng, Zhao, Yong, Hong, Huanyu, Huang, Tao, Li, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31418-w
_version_ 1784908929714618368
author Ma, Yupeng
Zhao, Yong
Hong, Huanyu
Huang, Tao
Li, Yu
author_facet Ma, Yupeng
Zhao, Yong
Hong, Huanyu
Huang, Tao
Li, Yu
author_sort Ma, Yupeng
collection PubMed
description To compare the stability and biomechanical characteristics of four commonly used triangular osteosynthesis techniques to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical application reference. Finite element models of Tile C-type pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis II sacral fracture) were produced. In four models, sacral fractures were fixed with a combination of unilateral L5, unilateral L4, and L5 iliac lumbar fixation with lengthened or normal sacroiliac screws. The biomechanical properties of the four fixation models were measured and compared under bipedal stance and lumbar rotation. The fixation stability of the model with the lengthened sacroiliac screw was excellent, and the fracture end was stable. The stability of fixation using unilateral L4 and L5 segments was close to that of unilateral L5 segment fixation. Triangular osteosynthesis transverse stabilization devices using lengthened sacroiliac screws can increase the vertical stability of the sacrum after internal fixation and increase the stability of the fracture. When triangular osteosynthesis lumbar fixation segments were selected, simultaneous fixation of L4 and L5 segments versus only L5 segments did not significantly enhance the vertical stability of the sacrum or the stability of the fracture end.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10023656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100236562023-03-19 Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures Ma, Yupeng Zhao, Yong Hong, Huanyu Huang, Tao Li, Yu Sci Rep Article To compare the stability and biomechanical characteristics of four commonly used triangular osteosynthesis techniques to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical application reference. Finite element models of Tile C-type pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis II sacral fracture) were produced. In four models, sacral fractures were fixed with a combination of unilateral L5, unilateral L4, and L5 iliac lumbar fixation with lengthened or normal sacroiliac screws. The biomechanical properties of the four fixation models were measured and compared under bipedal stance and lumbar rotation. The fixation stability of the model with the lengthened sacroiliac screw was excellent, and the fracture end was stable. The stability of fixation using unilateral L4 and L5 segments was close to that of unilateral L5 segment fixation. Triangular osteosynthesis transverse stabilization devices using lengthened sacroiliac screws can increase the vertical stability of the sacrum after internal fixation and increase the stability of the fracture. When triangular osteosynthesis lumbar fixation segments were selected, simultaneous fixation of L4 and L5 segments versus only L5 segments did not significantly enhance the vertical stability of the sacrum or the stability of the fracture end. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10023656/ /pubmed/36932113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31418-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ma, Yupeng
Zhao, Yong
Hong, Huanyu
Huang, Tao
Li, Yu
Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
title Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
title_full Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
title_short Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
title_sort biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31418-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mayupeng biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures
AT zhaoyong biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures
AT honghuanyu biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures
AT huangtao biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures
AT liyu biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures