Cargando…
Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures
To compare the stability and biomechanical characteristics of four commonly used triangular osteosynthesis techniques to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical application reference. Finite element models of Tile C-type pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis II sacral fractu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31418-w |
_version_ | 1784908929714618368 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Yupeng Zhao, Yong Hong, Huanyu Huang, Tao Li, Yu |
author_facet | Ma, Yupeng Zhao, Yong Hong, Huanyu Huang, Tao Li, Yu |
author_sort | Ma, Yupeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the stability and biomechanical characteristics of four commonly used triangular osteosynthesis techniques to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical application reference. Finite element models of Tile C-type pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis II sacral fracture) were produced. In four models, sacral fractures were fixed with a combination of unilateral L5, unilateral L4, and L5 iliac lumbar fixation with lengthened or normal sacroiliac screws. The biomechanical properties of the four fixation models were measured and compared under bipedal stance and lumbar rotation. The fixation stability of the model with the lengthened sacroiliac screw was excellent, and the fracture end was stable. The stability of fixation using unilateral L4 and L5 segments was close to that of unilateral L5 segment fixation. Triangular osteosynthesis transverse stabilization devices using lengthened sacroiliac screws can increase the vertical stability of the sacrum after internal fixation and increase the stability of the fracture. When triangular osteosynthesis lumbar fixation segments were selected, simultaneous fixation of L4 and L5 segments versus only L5 segments did not significantly enhance the vertical stability of the sacrum or the stability of the fracture end. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10023656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100236562023-03-19 Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures Ma, Yupeng Zhao, Yong Hong, Huanyu Huang, Tao Li, Yu Sci Rep Article To compare the stability and biomechanical characteristics of four commonly used triangular osteosynthesis techniques to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical application reference. Finite element models of Tile C-type pelvic ring injury (unilateral Denis II sacral fracture) were produced. In four models, sacral fractures were fixed with a combination of unilateral L5, unilateral L4, and L5 iliac lumbar fixation with lengthened or normal sacroiliac screws. The biomechanical properties of the four fixation models were measured and compared under bipedal stance and lumbar rotation. The fixation stability of the model with the lengthened sacroiliac screw was excellent, and the fracture end was stable. The stability of fixation using unilateral L4 and L5 segments was close to that of unilateral L5 segment fixation. Triangular osteosynthesis transverse stabilization devices using lengthened sacroiliac screws can increase the vertical stability of the sacrum after internal fixation and increase the stability of the fracture. When triangular osteosynthesis lumbar fixation segments were selected, simultaneous fixation of L4 and L5 segments versus only L5 segments did not significantly enhance the vertical stability of the sacrum or the stability of the fracture end. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10023656/ /pubmed/36932113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31418-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ma, Yupeng Zhao, Yong Hong, Huanyu Huang, Tao Li, Yu Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
title | Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
title_full | Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
title_short | Biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
title_sort | biomechanical comparison of four triangular osteosynthesis fixations for unilateral vertical sacral fractures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31418-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayupeng biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures AT zhaoyong biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures AT honghuanyu biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures AT huangtao biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures AT liyu biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtriangularosteosynthesisfixationsforunilateralverticalsacralfractures |