Cargando…
Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
Tear fluid forms a potential source for biomarker identification, and can be minimal invasively collected via Schirmer strips. The lack of knowledge on the processing of Schirmer strips however complicates the analysis and between-study comparisons. We studied two different pre-processing methods, s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31227-1 |
_version_ | 1784908934783434752 |
---|---|
author | Vergouwen, Daphne P. C. Schotting, Amber J. Endermann, Tanja van de Werken, Harmen J. G. Grashof, Dwin G. B. Arumugam, Sinthuja Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. ten Berge, Josianne C. Rothova, Aniki Schreurs, Marco W. J. Gijs, Marlies |
author_facet | Vergouwen, Daphne P. C. Schotting, Amber J. Endermann, Tanja van de Werken, Harmen J. G. Grashof, Dwin G. B. Arumugam, Sinthuja Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. ten Berge, Josianne C. Rothova, Aniki Schreurs, Marco W. J. Gijs, Marlies |
author_sort | Vergouwen, Daphne P. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tear fluid forms a potential source for biomarker identification, and can be minimal invasively collected via Schirmer strips. The lack of knowledge on the processing of Schirmer strips however complicates the analysis and between-study comparisons. We studied two different pre-processing methods, specifically the use of punches of the strip versus elution of the strip in a buffer. Tear fluid filled Schirmer strips were collected from 5 healthy participants, and divided into two halves over the length of the strip. In either part, punches or eluates were obtained from 4 different locations, from the first part touching the eye (head) to the end, to assess the protein distribution along the strips. The levels of 92 inflammatory proteins were measured in the punches/eluates using proximity extension assays. The punch method yielded higher protein detectability compared to the elution method (76% vs 66%; p ≤ 0.001). Protein expression level was found to be slightly higher in the head of the strip, however, 3 out of 5 punches from the head failed quality control. Protein expression levels over the remaining parts of the strips were similar. Our study showed beneficial use of punches of any part of the strip except the head in future biomarker research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10023677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100236772023-03-19 Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays Vergouwen, Daphne P. C. Schotting, Amber J. Endermann, Tanja van de Werken, Harmen J. G. Grashof, Dwin G. B. Arumugam, Sinthuja Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. ten Berge, Josianne C. Rothova, Aniki Schreurs, Marco W. J. Gijs, Marlies Sci Rep Article Tear fluid forms a potential source for biomarker identification, and can be minimal invasively collected via Schirmer strips. The lack of knowledge on the processing of Schirmer strips however complicates the analysis and between-study comparisons. We studied two different pre-processing methods, specifically the use of punches of the strip versus elution of the strip in a buffer. Tear fluid filled Schirmer strips were collected from 5 healthy participants, and divided into two halves over the length of the strip. In either part, punches or eluates were obtained from 4 different locations, from the first part touching the eye (head) to the end, to assess the protein distribution along the strips. The levels of 92 inflammatory proteins were measured in the punches/eluates using proximity extension assays. The punch method yielded higher protein detectability compared to the elution method (76% vs 66%; p ≤ 0.001). Protein expression level was found to be slightly higher in the head of the strip, however, 3 out of 5 punches from the head failed quality control. Protein expression levels over the remaining parts of the strips were similar. Our study showed beneficial use of punches of any part of the strip except the head in future biomarker research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10023677/ /pubmed/36932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31227-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Vergouwen, Daphne P. C. Schotting, Amber J. Endermann, Tanja van de Werken, Harmen J. G. Grashof, Dwin G. B. Arumugam, Sinthuja Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. ten Berge, Josianne C. Rothova, Aniki Schreurs, Marco W. J. Gijs, Marlies Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
title | Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
title_full | Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
title_short | Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
title_sort | evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31227-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vergouwendaphnepc evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT schottingamberj evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT endermanntanja evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT vandewerkenharmenjg evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT grashofdwingb evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT arumugamsinthuja evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT nuijtsrudymma evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT tenbergejosiannec evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT rothovaaniki evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT schreursmarcowj evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays AT gijsmarlies evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays |