Cargando…

Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays

Tear fluid forms a potential source for biomarker identification, and can be minimal invasively collected via Schirmer strips. The lack of knowledge on the processing of Schirmer strips however complicates the analysis and between-study comparisons. We studied two different pre-processing methods, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergouwen, Daphne P. C., Schotting, Amber J., Endermann, Tanja, van de Werken, Harmen J. G., Grashof, Dwin G. B., Arumugam, Sinthuja, Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A., ten Berge, Josianne C., Rothova, Aniki, Schreurs, Marco W. J., Gijs, Marlies
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31227-1
_version_ 1784908934783434752
author Vergouwen, Daphne P. C.
Schotting, Amber J.
Endermann, Tanja
van de Werken, Harmen J. G.
Grashof, Dwin G. B.
Arumugam, Sinthuja
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
ten Berge, Josianne C.
Rothova, Aniki
Schreurs, Marco W. J.
Gijs, Marlies
author_facet Vergouwen, Daphne P. C.
Schotting, Amber J.
Endermann, Tanja
van de Werken, Harmen J. G.
Grashof, Dwin G. B.
Arumugam, Sinthuja
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
ten Berge, Josianne C.
Rothova, Aniki
Schreurs, Marco W. J.
Gijs, Marlies
author_sort Vergouwen, Daphne P. C.
collection PubMed
description Tear fluid forms a potential source for biomarker identification, and can be minimal invasively collected via Schirmer strips. The lack of knowledge on the processing of Schirmer strips however complicates the analysis and between-study comparisons. We studied two different pre-processing methods, specifically the use of punches of the strip versus elution of the strip in a buffer. Tear fluid filled Schirmer strips were collected from 5 healthy participants, and divided into two halves over the length of the strip. In either part, punches or eluates were obtained from 4 different locations, from the first part touching the eye (head) to the end, to assess the protein distribution along the strips. The levels of 92 inflammatory proteins were measured in the punches/eluates using proximity extension assays. The punch method yielded higher protein detectability compared to the elution method (76% vs 66%; p ≤ 0.001). Protein expression level was found to be slightly higher in the head of the strip, however, 3 out of 5 punches from the head failed quality control. Protein expression levels over the remaining parts of the strips were similar. Our study showed beneficial use of punches of any part of the strip except the head in future biomarker research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10023677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100236772023-03-19 Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays Vergouwen, Daphne P. C. Schotting, Amber J. Endermann, Tanja van de Werken, Harmen J. G. Grashof, Dwin G. B. Arumugam, Sinthuja Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. ten Berge, Josianne C. Rothova, Aniki Schreurs, Marco W. J. Gijs, Marlies Sci Rep Article Tear fluid forms a potential source for biomarker identification, and can be minimal invasively collected via Schirmer strips. The lack of knowledge on the processing of Schirmer strips however complicates the analysis and between-study comparisons. We studied two different pre-processing methods, specifically the use of punches of the strip versus elution of the strip in a buffer. Tear fluid filled Schirmer strips were collected from 5 healthy participants, and divided into two halves over the length of the strip. In either part, punches or eluates were obtained from 4 different locations, from the first part touching the eye (head) to the end, to assess the protein distribution along the strips. The levels of 92 inflammatory proteins were measured in the punches/eluates using proximity extension assays. The punch method yielded higher protein detectability compared to the elution method (76% vs 66%; p ≤ 0.001). Protein expression level was found to be slightly higher in the head of the strip, however, 3 out of 5 punches from the head failed quality control. Protein expression levels over the remaining parts of the strips were similar. Our study showed beneficial use of punches of any part of the strip except the head in future biomarker research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10023677/ /pubmed/36932139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31227-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vergouwen, Daphne P. C.
Schotting, Amber J.
Endermann, Tanja
van de Werken, Harmen J. G.
Grashof, Dwin G. B.
Arumugam, Sinthuja
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
ten Berge, Josianne C.
Rothova, Aniki
Schreurs, Marco W. J.
Gijs, Marlies
Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
title Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
title_full Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
title_fullStr Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
title_short Evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
title_sort evaluation of pre-processing methods for tear fluid proteomics using proximity extension assays
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31227-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vergouwendaphnepc evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT schottingamberj evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT endermanntanja evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT vandewerkenharmenjg evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT grashofdwingb evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT arumugamsinthuja evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT nuijtsrudymma evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT tenbergejosiannec evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT rothovaaniki evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT schreursmarcowj evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays
AT gijsmarlies evaluationofpreprocessingmethodsfortearfluidproteomicsusingproximityextensionassays