Cargando…
The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3?
In 2005 and 2010, the European Commission (EC) published two subsequent ‘Road Maps’ to provide options for relaxation of the bans on the application of animal proteins in feed. Since then, the food production system has changed considerably and demands for more sustainability and circularity are gro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36942230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14021 |
_version_ | 1784908990634786816 |
---|---|
author | Meijer, Nathan Van Raamsdonk, Leo W.D. Gerrits, Elise W.J. Appel, Marko J. |
author_facet | Meijer, Nathan Van Raamsdonk, Leo W.D. Gerrits, Elise W.J. Appel, Marko J. |
author_sort | Meijer, Nathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2005 and 2010, the European Commission (EC) published two subsequent ‘Road Maps’ to provide options for relaxation of the bans on the application of animal proteins in feed. Since then, the food production system has changed considerably and demands for more sustainability and circularity are growing louder. Many relaxations envisioned in the second Road Map have by now been implemented, such as the use of processed animal proteins (PAPs) from poultry in pig feed and vice versa. However, some legislative changes, in particular concerning insects, had not been foreseen. In this article, we present a new vision on legislation for increased and improved use of animal by-products. Six current legislative principles are discussed for the bans on animal by-products as feed ingredients: feed bans; categorization of farmed animals; prohibition unless explicitly approved; approved processing techniques, the categorization of animal by-products, and monitoring methods. We provide a proposal for new guiding principles and future directions, and several concrete options for further relaxations. We argue that biological nature of farmed animals in terms of dietary preferences should be better recognised, that legal zero-tolerance limits should be expanded if safe, and that legislation should be revised and simplified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10023914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100239142023-03-19 The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? Meijer, Nathan Van Raamsdonk, Leo W.D. Gerrits, Elise W.J. Appel, Marko J. Heliyon Review Article In 2005 and 2010, the European Commission (EC) published two subsequent ‘Road Maps’ to provide options for relaxation of the bans on the application of animal proteins in feed. Since then, the food production system has changed considerably and demands for more sustainability and circularity are growing louder. Many relaxations envisioned in the second Road Map have by now been implemented, such as the use of processed animal proteins (PAPs) from poultry in pig feed and vice versa. However, some legislative changes, in particular concerning insects, had not been foreseen. In this article, we present a new vision on legislation for increased and improved use of animal by-products. Six current legislative principles are discussed for the bans on animal by-products as feed ingredients: feed bans; categorization of farmed animals; prohibition unless explicitly approved; approved processing techniques, the categorization of animal by-products, and monitoring methods. We provide a proposal for new guiding principles and future directions, and several concrete options for further relaxations. We argue that biological nature of farmed animals in terms of dietary preferences should be better recognised, that legal zero-tolerance limits should be expanded if safe, and that legislation should be revised and simplified. Elsevier 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10023914/ /pubmed/36942230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14021 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Meijer, Nathan Van Raamsdonk, Leo W.D. Gerrits, Elise W.J. Appel, Marko J. The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? |
title | The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? |
title_full | The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? |
title_fullStr | The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? |
title_short | The use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: Time for a TSE road map 3? |
title_sort | use of animal by-products in a circular bioeconomy: time for a tse road map 3? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36942230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meijernathan theuseofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT vanraamsdonkleowd theuseofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT gerritselisewj theuseofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT appelmarkoj theuseofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT meijernathan useofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT vanraamsdonkleowd useofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT gerritselisewj useofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 AT appelmarkoj useofanimalbyproductsinacircularbioeconomytimeforatseroadmap3 |