Cargando…
Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the evidence supporting treatment decisions for cholestatic pruritus associated with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). METHODS: Studies that enrolled ≥ 75% participants with PBC o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36933112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07862-z |
_version_ | 1784909017073582080 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Helen T. de Souza, Andrea Ribeiro Thompson, April H. McLaughlin, Megan M. Dever, John J. Myers, Julie A. Chen, Jing Voon |
author_facet | Smith, Helen T. de Souza, Andrea Ribeiro Thompson, April H. McLaughlin, Megan M. Dever, John J. Myers, Julie A. Chen, Jing Voon |
author_sort | Smith, Helen T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the evidence supporting treatment decisions for cholestatic pruritus associated with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). METHODS: Studies that enrolled ≥ 75% participants with PBC or PSC and reported ≥ 1 endpoint(s) related to efficacy, safety, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or other patient-reported outcomes were included. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Quality of Cohort studies tool for non-RCTs. RESULTS: Thirty-nine publications were identified, covering 42 studies and six treatment classes (including investigational and approved products): anion-exchange resins, antibiotics (rifampicin/derivatives), opiates, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fibrates, ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors and other agents not categorised in these six classes. Across studies, median sample size was small (n = 18), 20 studies were over 20 years old, 25 followed patients for ≤ 6 weeks, only 25 were RCTs. Pruritus was assessed using several different tools, with inconsistencies in their application. Cholestyramine, considered first-line therapy for moderate-severe cholestatic pruritus, was assessed in six studies (two RCTs) including 56 patients with PBC and 2 with PSC, with evidence of efficacy demonstrated in only three studies, among which, two RCTs were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Findings were similar for other drug classes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of consistent and reproducible evidence available on efficacy, impact on HRQoL, and safety of cholestatic pruritus treatments, leaving physicians to rely on clinical experience rather than evidence-based medicine for treatment selection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10620-023-07862-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10024020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100240202023-03-21 Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review Smith, Helen T. de Souza, Andrea Ribeiro Thompson, April H. McLaughlin, Megan M. Dever, John J. Myers, Julie A. Chen, Jing Voon Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the evidence supporting treatment decisions for cholestatic pruritus associated with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). METHODS: Studies that enrolled ≥ 75% participants with PBC or PSC and reported ≥ 1 endpoint(s) related to efficacy, safety, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or other patient-reported outcomes were included. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Quality of Cohort studies tool for non-RCTs. RESULTS: Thirty-nine publications were identified, covering 42 studies and six treatment classes (including investigational and approved products): anion-exchange resins, antibiotics (rifampicin/derivatives), opiates, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fibrates, ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors and other agents not categorised in these six classes. Across studies, median sample size was small (n = 18), 20 studies were over 20 years old, 25 followed patients for ≤ 6 weeks, only 25 were RCTs. Pruritus was assessed using several different tools, with inconsistencies in their application. Cholestyramine, considered first-line therapy for moderate-severe cholestatic pruritus, was assessed in six studies (two RCTs) including 56 patients with PBC and 2 with PSC, with evidence of efficacy demonstrated in only three studies, among which, two RCTs were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Findings were similar for other drug classes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of consistent and reproducible evidence available on efficacy, impact on HRQoL, and safety of cholestatic pruritus treatments, leaving physicians to rely on clinical experience rather than evidence-based medicine for treatment selection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10620-023-07862-z. Springer US 2023-03-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10024020/ /pubmed/36933112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07862-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Smith, Helen T. de Souza, Andrea Ribeiro Thompson, April H. McLaughlin, Megan M. Dever, John J. Myers, Julie A. Chen, Jing Voon Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | cholestatic pruritus treatments in primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic literature review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36933112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07862-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithhelent cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview AT desouzaandrearibeiro cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview AT thompsonaprilh cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview AT mclaughlinmeganm cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview AT deverjohnj cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview AT myersjuliea cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview AT chenjingvoon cholestaticpruritustreatmentsinprimarybiliarycholangitisandprimarysclerosingcholangitisasystematicliteraturereview |