Cargando…
Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy
PURPOSE: To review the effects of ionizing radiation to the conceptus and the relationship to the timing of the exposure during pregnancy. To consider strategies that would mitigate potential harms associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. METHODS: Data reported in the peer-re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36933026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w |
_version_ | 1784909068244090880 |
---|---|
author | Mainprize, James G. Yaffe, Martin J. Chawla, Tanya Glanc, Phyllis |
author_facet | Mainprize, James G. Yaffe, Martin J. Chawla, Tanya Glanc, Phyllis |
author_sort | Mainprize, James G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To review the effects of ionizing radiation to the conceptus and the relationship to the timing of the exposure during pregnancy. To consider strategies that would mitigate potential harms associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. METHODS: Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on entrance KERMA received from specific radiological examinations were combined with published results from experiment or Monte Carlo modeling of tissue and organ doses per entrance KERMA to estimate total doses that could be received from specific procedures. Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on dose mitigation strategies, best practices for shielding, consent, counseling and emerging technologies were reviewed. RESULTS: For procedures utilizing ionizing radiation for which the conceptus is not included in the primary radiation beam, typical doses are well below the threshold for causing tissue reactions and the risk of induction of childhood cancer is low. For procedures that include the conceptus in the primary radiation field, longer fluoroscopic interventional procedures or multiphase/multiple exposures potentially could approach or exceed thresholds for tissue reactions and the risk of cancer induction must be weighed against the expected risk/benefit of performing (or not) the imaging examination. Gonadal shielding is no longer considered best practice. Emerging technologies such as whole-body DWI/MRI, dual-energy CT and ultralow dose studies are gaining importance for overall dose reduction strategies. CONCLUSION: The ALARA principle, considering potential benefits and risks should be followed with respect to the use of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, as Wieseler et al. (2010) state, “no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration.” Best practices require updates on current available technologies and guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10024285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100242852023-03-21 Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy Mainprize, James G. Yaffe, Martin J. Chawla, Tanya Glanc, Phyllis Abdom Radiol (NY) Special Section: Cancer in Pregnancy PURPOSE: To review the effects of ionizing radiation to the conceptus and the relationship to the timing of the exposure during pregnancy. To consider strategies that would mitigate potential harms associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. METHODS: Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on entrance KERMA received from specific radiological examinations were combined with published results from experiment or Monte Carlo modeling of tissue and organ doses per entrance KERMA to estimate total doses that could be received from specific procedures. Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on dose mitigation strategies, best practices for shielding, consent, counseling and emerging technologies were reviewed. RESULTS: For procedures utilizing ionizing radiation for which the conceptus is not included in the primary radiation beam, typical doses are well below the threshold for causing tissue reactions and the risk of induction of childhood cancer is low. For procedures that include the conceptus in the primary radiation field, longer fluoroscopic interventional procedures or multiphase/multiple exposures potentially could approach or exceed thresholds for tissue reactions and the risk of cancer induction must be weighed against the expected risk/benefit of performing (or not) the imaging examination. Gonadal shielding is no longer considered best practice. Emerging technologies such as whole-body DWI/MRI, dual-energy CT and ultralow dose studies are gaining importance for overall dose reduction strategies. CONCLUSION: The ALARA principle, considering potential benefits and risks should be followed with respect to the use of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, as Wieseler et al. (2010) state, “no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration.” Best practices require updates on current available technologies and guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w. Springer US 2023-03-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10024285/ /pubmed/36933026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Special Section: Cancer in Pregnancy Mainprize, James G. Yaffe, Martin J. Chawla, Tanya Glanc, Phyllis Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
title | Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
title_full | Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
title_short | Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
title_sort | effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy |
topic | Special Section: Cancer in Pregnancy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36933026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mainprizejamesg effectsofionizingradiationexposureduringpregnancy AT yaffemartinj effectsofionizingradiationexposureduringpregnancy AT chawlatanya effectsofionizingradiationexposureduringpregnancy AT glancphyllis effectsofionizingradiationexposureduringpregnancy |