Cargando…
Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The use of assistive robotic systems in care is intended to relieve nursing staff. Differentiated and literature-based findings on current application possibilities, technological developments and empirical findings are necessary to enable a goal-oriented and participatory development of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01230-y |
_version_ | 1784909069912375296 |
---|---|
author | Ohneberg, Christoph Stöbich, Nicole Warmbein, Angelika Rathgeber, Ivanka Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Christin Fischer, Uli Eberl, Inge |
author_facet | Ohneberg, Christoph Stöbich, Nicole Warmbein, Angelika Rathgeber, Ivanka Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Christin Fischer, Uli Eberl, Inge |
author_sort | Ohneberg, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of assistive robotic systems in care is intended to relieve nursing staff. Differentiated and literature-based findings on current application possibilities, technological developments and empirical findings are necessary to enable a goal-oriented and participatory development of assistive robotic systems of care. The aim of this review was to identify assistive robotic systems and their areas of application in nursing settings. Furthermore, an overview of existing social and nursing science findings from the research field of assistive robotic systems will be described. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed based on the JBI scoping review methodology. During the period from May to August 2020, the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library were searched. In order to reflect current developments and evidence in the present literature work, a supplementary search with these same requirements was conducted in January 2022. RESULTS: The 47 included publications are divided into 15 studies, 23 technical articles and nine opinion-based articles (text-opinion). A total of 39 different assistive robotic systems were identified. There were 55% in the testing phase and 29% of the systems in the development phase. Assistive robotic systems can be divided into six fields of application: Information and patient data processing, assistance with activities of daily living, fetch and bring activities, telepresence and communication, monitoring, safety and navigation, and complex assistance systems. The description of the study findings is divided into "integration of technology and impact on practice" and "attitude and acceptance of elderly people towards assistive robotic systems". CONCLUSION: The results of the research show that the use of assistive robotic systems in care mainly take place in the context of development and testing phases. In addition to usability and acceptance issues, implementation factors must be integrated into theory-driven research projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10024291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100242912023-03-19 Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review Ohneberg, Christoph Stöbich, Nicole Warmbein, Angelika Rathgeber, Ivanka Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Christin Fischer, Uli Eberl, Inge BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: The use of assistive robotic systems in care is intended to relieve nursing staff. Differentiated and literature-based findings on current application possibilities, technological developments and empirical findings are necessary to enable a goal-oriented and participatory development of assistive robotic systems of care. The aim of this review was to identify assistive robotic systems and their areas of application in nursing settings. Furthermore, an overview of existing social and nursing science findings from the research field of assistive robotic systems will be described. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed based on the JBI scoping review methodology. During the period from May to August 2020, the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library were searched. In order to reflect current developments and evidence in the present literature work, a supplementary search with these same requirements was conducted in January 2022. RESULTS: The 47 included publications are divided into 15 studies, 23 technical articles and nine opinion-based articles (text-opinion). A total of 39 different assistive robotic systems were identified. There were 55% in the testing phase and 29% of the systems in the development phase. Assistive robotic systems can be divided into six fields of application: Information and patient data processing, assistance with activities of daily living, fetch and bring activities, telepresence and communication, monitoring, safety and navigation, and complex assistance systems. The description of the study findings is divided into "integration of technology and impact on practice" and "attitude and acceptance of elderly people towards assistive robotic systems". CONCLUSION: The results of the research show that the use of assistive robotic systems in care mainly take place in the context of development and testing phases. In addition to usability and acceptance issues, implementation factors must be integrated into theory-driven research projects. BioMed Central 2023-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10024291/ /pubmed/36934280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01230-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ohneberg, Christoph Stöbich, Nicole Warmbein, Angelika Rathgeber, Ivanka Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Christin Fischer, Uli Eberl, Inge Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
title | Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
title_full | Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
title_short | Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
title_sort | assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01230-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohnebergchristoph assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview AT stobichnicole assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview AT warmbeinangelika assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview AT rathgeberivanka assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview AT mehlerklamtamreichristin assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview AT fischeruli assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview AT eberlinge assistiveroboticsystemsinnursingcareascopingreview |