Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Recently, a few studies based on anti-factor Xa activity levels have propounded doubtful and sub-prophylactic levels by the usual dose of enoxaparin in surgical and critically ill patients. In this study, we assessed two doses of enoxaparin in adult non-critically ill patients. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alavi-Darazam, Ilad, Forouhar, Kimia, Moradi, Omid, Saffaei, Ali, Asadi, Sara, Sahraei, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Briefland 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36942062
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-126555
_version_ 1784909078540058624
author Alavi-Darazam, Ilad
Forouhar, Kimia
Moradi, Omid
Saffaei, Ali
Asadi, Sara
Sahraei, Zahra
author_facet Alavi-Darazam, Ilad
Forouhar, Kimia
Moradi, Omid
Saffaei, Ali
Asadi, Sara
Sahraei, Zahra
author_sort Alavi-Darazam, Ilad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, a few studies based on anti-factor Xa activity levels have propounded doubtful and sub-prophylactic levels by the usual dose of enoxaparin in surgical and critically ill patients. In this study, we assessed two doses of enoxaparin in adult non-critically ill patients. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. While the intervention group received enoxaparin with a daily dose of 60 mg, the control group received enoxaparin 40 mg. Anti-factor Xa activity was measured based on the peak steady-state levels. The level of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL was considered as a prophylactic goal. All individuals were followed for bleeding or thromboembolic events during admission. RESULTS: The mean levels of anti-factor Xa were 0.29 ± 0.13 IU/mL in the control group (n = 31) and 0.44 ± 0.19 IU/mL in the intervention group (n = 29). More patients in the control group had an optimal level of anti-factor Xa compared to the patients in the intervention group (62.1% vs. 29%). No adverse outcomes were detected in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin dose of 60 mg daily provided anti-factor Xa level higher than desired in most patients. In non-critically ill patients, the dose of 40 mg is the proper dose for thromboprophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10024325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Briefland
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100243252023-03-19 Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Alavi-Darazam, Ilad Forouhar, Kimia Moradi, Omid Saffaei, Ali Asadi, Sara Sahraei, Zahra Iran J Pharm Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, a few studies based on anti-factor Xa activity levels have propounded doubtful and sub-prophylactic levels by the usual dose of enoxaparin in surgical and critically ill patients. In this study, we assessed two doses of enoxaparin in adult non-critically ill patients. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. While the intervention group received enoxaparin with a daily dose of 60 mg, the control group received enoxaparin 40 mg. Anti-factor Xa activity was measured based on the peak steady-state levels. The level of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL was considered as a prophylactic goal. All individuals were followed for bleeding or thromboembolic events during admission. RESULTS: The mean levels of anti-factor Xa were 0.29 ± 0.13 IU/mL in the control group (n = 31) and 0.44 ± 0.19 IU/mL in the intervention group (n = 29). More patients in the control group had an optimal level of anti-factor Xa compared to the patients in the intervention group (62.1% vs. 29%). No adverse outcomes were detected in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin dose of 60 mg daily provided anti-factor Xa level higher than desired in most patients. In non-critically ill patients, the dose of 40 mg is the proper dose for thromboprophylaxis. Briefland 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10024325/ /pubmed/36942062 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-126555 Text en Copyright © 2022, Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alavi-Darazam, Ilad
Forouhar, Kimia
Moradi, Omid
Saffaei, Ali
Asadi, Sara
Sahraei, Zahra
Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of two different enoxaparin doses for thromboprophylaxis in non-critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36942062
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-126555
work_keys_str_mv AT alavidarazamilad efficacyandsafetyoftwodifferentenoxaparindosesforthromboprophylaxisinnoncriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT forouharkimia efficacyandsafetyoftwodifferentenoxaparindosesforthromboprophylaxisinnoncriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moradiomid efficacyandsafetyoftwodifferentenoxaparindosesforthromboprophylaxisinnoncriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saffaeiali efficacyandsafetyoftwodifferentenoxaparindosesforthromboprophylaxisinnoncriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT asadisara efficacyandsafetyoftwodifferentenoxaparindosesforthromboprophylaxisinnoncriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sahraeizahra efficacyandsafetyoftwodifferentenoxaparindosesforthromboprophylaxisinnoncriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial