Cargando…

Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS: Numerous studies have shown that dental unit water lines (DUWLs) are often contaminated by a wide range of micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa) and various prevalence have been reported for it in previous studies. Therefore, this review study aims to describe the prevalence of ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayani, Mojtaba, Raisolvaezin, Kiyavash, Almasi-Hashiani, Amir, Mirhoseini, Seyed Hamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02885-4
_version_ 1784909093398380544
author Bayani, Mojtaba
Raisolvaezin, Kiyavash
Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
Mirhoseini, Seyed Hamed
author_facet Bayani, Mojtaba
Raisolvaezin, Kiyavash
Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
Mirhoseini, Seyed Hamed
author_sort Bayani, Mojtaba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Numerous studies have shown that dental unit water lines (DUWLs) are often contaminated by a wide range of micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa) and various prevalence have been reported for it in previous studies. Therefore, this review study aims to describe the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which the related keywords in different international databases, including Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus were searched. The retrieved studies were screened and the required data were extracted from the included studies. Three standard methods including American Dental Association (ADA), The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and contaminated > 100 CFU/ml(C-100) standards were used to assess the bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs. All studies that calculated the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs, and English full-text studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies that did not have relevant data or used unusual laboratory methods were excluded. Methodological risk of bias was assessed by a related checklist and finally, the data were pooled by fixed or random-effect models. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty-six studies were identified and screened and 26 related studies were included in the meta-analysis. The oldest included study was published in 1976 and the most recent study was published in 2020. According to the ADA, CDC and C-100 standards, the prevalence of bacterial contamination was estimated to be 85.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.0–94.0%), 77.0% (95%CI: 66.0–85.0%) and 69.0% (95%CI: 67.0–71.0%), respectively. The prevalence of Legionella Pneumophila and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in DUWLs was estimated to be 12.0% (95%CI: 10.0–14.0%) and 8.0% (95%CI: 2.0–24.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this review study suggested a high prevalence of bacterial biofilm in DUWLs; therefore, the use of appropriate disinfecting protocol is recommended to reduce the prevalence of contamination and reduce the probable cross-infection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-02885-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10024400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100244002023-03-19 Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bayani, Mojtaba Raisolvaezin, Kiyavash Almasi-Hashiani, Amir Mirhoseini, Seyed Hamed BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUNDS: Numerous studies have shown that dental unit water lines (DUWLs) are often contaminated by a wide range of micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa) and various prevalence have been reported for it in previous studies. Therefore, this review study aims to describe the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which the related keywords in different international databases, including Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus were searched. The retrieved studies were screened and the required data were extracted from the included studies. Three standard methods including American Dental Association (ADA), The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and contaminated > 100 CFU/ml(C-100) standards were used to assess the bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs. All studies that calculated the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs, and English full-text studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies that did not have relevant data or used unusual laboratory methods were excluded. Methodological risk of bias was assessed by a related checklist and finally, the data were pooled by fixed or random-effect models. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty-six studies were identified and screened and 26 related studies were included in the meta-analysis. The oldest included study was published in 1976 and the most recent study was published in 2020. According to the ADA, CDC and C-100 standards, the prevalence of bacterial contamination was estimated to be 85.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.0–94.0%), 77.0% (95%CI: 66.0–85.0%) and 69.0% (95%CI: 67.0–71.0%), respectively. The prevalence of Legionella Pneumophila and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in DUWLs was estimated to be 12.0% (95%CI: 10.0–14.0%) and 8.0% (95%CI: 2.0–24.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this review study suggested a high prevalence of bacterial biofilm in DUWLs; therefore, the use of appropriate disinfecting protocol is recommended to reduce the prevalence of contamination and reduce the probable cross-infection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-02885-4. BioMed Central 2023-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10024400/ /pubmed/36934281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02885-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bayani, Mojtaba
Raisolvaezin, Kiyavash
Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
Mirhoseini, Seyed Hamed
Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02885-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bayanimojtaba bacterialbiofilmprevalenceindentalunitwaterlinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raisolvaezinkiyavash bacterialbiofilmprevalenceindentalunitwaterlinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT almasihashianiamir bacterialbiofilmprevalenceindentalunitwaterlinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mirhoseiniseyedhamed bacterialbiofilmprevalenceindentalunitwaterlinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis