Cargando…
Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA)
BACKGROUND: Urban environments are important determinants of human health. The term walkability summarizes features of the urban built environment that promote walking and other types of physical activity. While the beneficial effects of active and public transport have been well established, the he...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4 |
_version_ | 1784909103064154112 |
---|---|
author | Westenhöfer, Joachim Nouri, Elham Reschke, Merle Linn Seebach, Fabian Buchcik, Johanna |
author_facet | Westenhöfer, Joachim Nouri, Elham Reschke, Merle Linn Seebach, Fabian Buchcik, Johanna |
author_sort | Westenhöfer, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Urban environments are important determinants of human health. The term walkability summarizes features of the urban built environment that promote walking and other types of physical activity. While the beneficial effects of active and public transport have been well established, the health impact of other features of walkability are less well documented. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIAs) of walkability. Studies were identified through PUBMED and Science Direct, from two German websites related to urban health and reference tracking. Finally, 40 studies were included in the present review. We applied qualitative thematic analysis to summarize the major results from these studies. RESULTS: Most of the HIAs (n = 31) reported the improvement of health or health behaviour resulting from an investigated project or policy. However, three HIAs reported a lack of improvement or even a decrease of health status. In parallel, 13 HIAs reported a gain in economic value, whereas one reported a lack or loss of economic effects. Moreover, three HIAs reported on social effects and six HIAs gave additional recommendations for policies or the implementation of projects or HIAs. CONCLUSIONS: Most HIAs investigate the impact of increasing active or public transport. Other features of walkability are less well studied. With few exceptions, HIAs document beneficial impacts of improving walkability on a variety of health outcomes, including reductions of mortality and non-communicable diseases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10024446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100244462023-03-19 Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) Westenhöfer, Joachim Nouri, Elham Reschke, Merle Linn Seebach, Fabian Buchcik, Johanna BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Urban environments are important determinants of human health. The term walkability summarizes features of the urban built environment that promote walking and other types of physical activity. While the beneficial effects of active and public transport have been well established, the health impact of other features of walkability are less well documented. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIAs) of walkability. Studies were identified through PUBMED and Science Direct, from two German websites related to urban health and reference tracking. Finally, 40 studies were included in the present review. We applied qualitative thematic analysis to summarize the major results from these studies. RESULTS: Most of the HIAs (n = 31) reported the improvement of health or health behaviour resulting from an investigated project or policy. However, three HIAs reported a lack of improvement or even a decrease of health status. In parallel, 13 HIAs reported a gain in economic value, whereas one reported a lack or loss of economic effects. Moreover, three HIAs reported on social effects and six HIAs gave additional recommendations for policies or the implementation of projects or HIAs. CONCLUSIONS: Most HIAs investigate the impact of increasing active or public transport. Other features of walkability are less well studied. With few exceptions, HIAs document beneficial impacts of improving walkability on a variety of health outcomes, including reductions of mortality and non-communicable diseases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4. BioMed Central 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10024446/ /pubmed/36932349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Westenhöfer, Joachim Nouri, Elham Reschke, Merle Linn Seebach, Fabian Buchcik, Johanna Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) |
title | Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) |
title_full | Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) |
title_fullStr | Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) |
title_short | Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA) |
title_sort | walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (hia) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT westenhoferjoachim walkabilityandurbanbuiltenvironmentsasystematicreviewofhealthimpactassessmentshia AT nourielham walkabilityandurbanbuiltenvironmentsasystematicreviewofhealthimpactassessmentshia AT reschkemerlelinn walkabilityandurbanbuiltenvironmentsasystematicreviewofhealthimpactassessmentshia AT seebachfabian walkabilityandurbanbuiltenvironmentsasystematicreviewofhealthimpactassessmentshia AT buchcikjohanna walkabilityandurbanbuiltenvironmentsasystematicreviewofhealthimpactassessmentshia |