Cargando…

The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites

INTRODUCTION: This study examined Vickers hardness as well as surface characteristics of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composites prior to and after storage in various media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CAD/CAM resin composite blocks (Grandio Blocs (GB), Lav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuchs, Florian, Schmidtke, Julius, Hahnel, Sebastian, Koenig, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-023-06713-7
_version_ 1784909156062330880
author Fuchs, Florian
Schmidtke, Julius
Hahnel, Sebastian
Koenig, Andreas
author_facet Fuchs, Florian
Schmidtke, Julius
Hahnel, Sebastian
Koenig, Andreas
author_sort Fuchs, Florian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study examined Vickers hardness as well as surface characteristics of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composites prior to and after storage in various media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CAD/CAM resin composite blocks (Grandio Blocs (GB), Lava Ultimate (LU), Brilliant Crios (BC), Cerasmart (GC), Shofu Block HC (SB), Tetric CAD (TC), Luxacam Composite (LC); incl. different translucency variants) were prepared, polished and surface free energy was determined. The specimens were divided into four groups: dry conditions for 24 h (25 °C), demineralized water (37 °C), Pepsi Cola (37 °C) and 75% ethanol (37 °C). After seven and 28 days of storage, Vickers hardness was determined. Surface roughness was measured after the entire storage period. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Vickers hardness was in the range of about 150 HV for GB, around 115 HV for LU, and 80–100 HV for BC, GC, SB, TC and LC. Only minor differences (total: 50.2 (6.4)–56.2 (3.2) mN/m) in surface free energy could be detected. No relationship was observed between surface free energy and filler content. However, a correlation between filler content and Vickers hardness was evident. Artificial aging caused a decrease of Vickers hardness (up to −40 HV or 35%) depending on storage media, duration and material. The changes in surface texture after immersion in different media were below a value of ΔSa = 0.015 µm. CONCLUSION: Artificial aging of CAD/CAM resin composites leads to a significant decrease of Vickers hardness for most materials, while only small changes in surface roughness were identified. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10024666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100246662023-03-20 The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites Fuchs, Florian Schmidtke, Julius Hahnel, Sebastian Koenig, Andreas J Mater Sci Mater Med Clinical Applications of Biomaterials INTRODUCTION: This study examined Vickers hardness as well as surface characteristics of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composites prior to and after storage in various media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CAD/CAM resin composite blocks (Grandio Blocs (GB), Lava Ultimate (LU), Brilliant Crios (BC), Cerasmart (GC), Shofu Block HC (SB), Tetric CAD (TC), Luxacam Composite (LC); incl. different translucency variants) were prepared, polished and surface free energy was determined. The specimens were divided into four groups: dry conditions for 24 h (25 °C), demineralized water (37 °C), Pepsi Cola (37 °C) and 75% ethanol (37 °C). After seven and 28 days of storage, Vickers hardness was determined. Surface roughness was measured after the entire storage period. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Vickers hardness was in the range of about 150 HV for GB, around 115 HV for LU, and 80–100 HV for BC, GC, SB, TC and LC. Only minor differences (total: 50.2 (6.4)–56.2 (3.2) mN/m) in surface free energy could be detected. No relationship was observed between surface free energy and filler content. However, a correlation between filler content and Vickers hardness was evident. Artificial aging caused a decrease of Vickers hardness (up to −40 HV or 35%) depending on storage media, duration and material. The changes in surface texture after immersion in different media were below a value of ΔSa = 0.015 µm. CONCLUSION: Artificial aging of CAD/CAM resin composites leads to a significant decrease of Vickers hardness for most materials, while only small changes in surface roughness were identified. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2023-03-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10024666/ /pubmed/36934208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-023-06713-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
Fuchs, Florian
Schmidtke, Julius
Hahnel, Sebastian
Koenig, Andreas
The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites
title The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites
title_full The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites
title_fullStr The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites
title_full_unstemmed The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites
title_short The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites
title_sort influence of different storage media on vickers hardness and surface roughness of cad/cam resin composites
topic Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-023-06713-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fuchsflorian theinfluenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT schmidtkejulius theinfluenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT hahnelsebastian theinfluenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT koenigandreas theinfluenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT fuchsflorian influenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT schmidtkejulius influenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT hahnelsebastian influenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites
AT koenigandreas influenceofdifferentstoragemediaonvickershardnessandsurfaceroughnessofcadcamresincomposites