Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting physical activity for older adults is strongly positive. Implementation and scale-up of these interventions need to consider the value for money. This scoping review aimed to assess the volume of (i) systematic review evidence regarding economic evaluations of physica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinheiro, Marina B, Howard, Kirsten, Oliveira, Juliana S, Kwok, Wing S, Tiedemann, Anne, Wang, Belinda, Taylor, Jennifer, Bauman, Adrian, Sherrington, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad023
_version_ 1784909209016467456
author Pinheiro, Marina B
Howard, Kirsten
Oliveira, Juliana S
Kwok, Wing S
Tiedemann, Anne
Wang, Belinda
Taylor, Jennifer
Bauman, Adrian
Sherrington, Catherine
author_facet Pinheiro, Marina B
Howard, Kirsten
Oliveira, Juliana S
Kwok, Wing S
Tiedemann, Anne
Wang, Belinda
Taylor, Jennifer
Bauman, Adrian
Sherrington, Catherine
author_sort Pinheiro, Marina B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting physical activity for older adults is strongly positive. Implementation and scale-up of these interventions need to consider the value for money. This scoping review aimed to assess the volume of (i) systematic review evidence regarding economic evaluations of physical activity interventions, and (ii) of cost utility analysis (CUA) studies (trial- or model-based) of physical activity interventions for older people. METHODS: We searched five databases (January 2010 to February 2022) for systematic reviews of economic evaluations, and two databases (1976 to February 2022) for CUA studies of physical activity interventions for any population of people aged 60+ years. RESULTS: We found 12 potential reviews, two of which were eligible for inclusion. The remaining 10 reviews included eligible individual studies that were included in this review. All individual studies from the 12 reviews (n = 37) investigated the cost-effectiveness of structured exercise and most showed the intervention was more costly but more effective than no intervention. We identified 27 CUA studies: two investigated a physical activity promotion program and the remainder investigated structured exercise. Most interventions (86%) were more costly but more effective, and the remaining were cost-saving compared to no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of reviews investigating the value for money of physical activity interventions for older adults. Most studies investigated structured exercise. Physical activity interventions were generally more effective than no intervention but more costly. As such an intervention could be cost-effective and therefore worthy of wider implementation, but there is a need for more frequent economic evaluation in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10024893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100248932023-03-20 Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review Pinheiro, Marina B Howard, Kirsten Oliveira, Juliana S Kwok, Wing S Tiedemann, Anne Wang, Belinda Taylor, Jennifer Bauman, Adrian Sherrington, Catherine Age Ageing Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting physical activity for older adults is strongly positive. Implementation and scale-up of these interventions need to consider the value for money. This scoping review aimed to assess the volume of (i) systematic review evidence regarding economic evaluations of physical activity interventions, and (ii) of cost utility analysis (CUA) studies (trial- or model-based) of physical activity interventions for older people. METHODS: We searched five databases (January 2010 to February 2022) for systematic reviews of economic evaluations, and two databases (1976 to February 2022) for CUA studies of physical activity interventions for any population of people aged 60+ years. RESULTS: We found 12 potential reviews, two of which were eligible for inclusion. The remaining 10 reviews included eligible individual studies that were included in this review. All individual studies from the 12 reviews (n = 37) investigated the cost-effectiveness of structured exercise and most showed the intervention was more costly but more effective than no intervention. We identified 27 CUA studies: two investigated a physical activity promotion program and the remainder investigated structured exercise. Most interventions (86%) were more costly but more effective, and the remaining were cost-saving compared to no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of reviews investigating the value for money of physical activity interventions for older adults. Most studies investigated structured exercise. Physical activity interventions were generally more effective than no intervention but more costly. As such an intervention could be cost-effective and therefore worthy of wider implementation, but there is a need for more frequent economic evaluation in this field. Oxford University Press 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10024893/ /pubmed/36934340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad023 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Pinheiro, Marina B
Howard, Kirsten
Oliveira, Juliana S
Kwok, Wing S
Tiedemann, Anne
Wang, Belinda
Taylor, Jennifer
Bauman, Adrian
Sherrington, Catherine
Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
title Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
title_full Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
title_short Cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
title_sort cost-effectiveness of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad023
work_keys_str_mv AT pinheiromarinab costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT howardkirsten costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT oliveirajulianas costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT kwokwings costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT tiedemannanne costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT wangbelinda costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT taylorjennifer costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT baumanadrian costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview
AT sherringtoncatherine costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityprogramsandservicesforolderadultsascopingreview