Cargando…
Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950395 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643 |
_version_ | 1784909389843398656 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Si Zhou, Biao Li, Zheng Gao, Juan Wang, Pei |
author_facet | Jiang, Si Zhou, Biao Li, Zheng Gao, Juan Wang, Pei |
author_sort | Jiang, Si |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group-A were extracted by high-speed turbodrill root extraction, while Group-B were extracted by piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement. After extraction, GBR bone grafting and soft tissue transplantation were performed on the extraction sockets. The extraction time, integrity rate of labial bone plate of the extraction socket, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate, reduction of the height and width of the alveolar ridge, alveolar bone mineral density score, and new bone contour score of the alveolar bone of two groups were compared. RESULT: Group-B was significantly superior to Group-A in terms of tooth extraction time, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate and reduction of alveolar ridge height at three sites on the palatal side, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement is more worthy of clinical application due to its advantages of less impact on the preservation of the palatal alveolar ridge height of the maxillary anterior teeth, shorter tooth extraction time, postoperative pain-free rate and high final satisfaction rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10025688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100256882023-03-21 Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Jiang, Si Zhou, Biao Li, Zheng Gao, Juan Wang, Pei Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group-A were extracted by high-speed turbodrill root extraction, while Group-B were extracted by piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement. After extraction, GBR bone grafting and soft tissue transplantation were performed on the extraction sockets. The extraction time, integrity rate of labial bone plate of the extraction socket, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate, reduction of the height and width of the alveolar ridge, alveolar bone mineral density score, and new bone contour score of the alveolar bone of two groups were compared. RESULT: Group-B was significantly superior to Group-A in terms of tooth extraction time, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate and reduction of alveolar ridge height at three sites on the palatal side, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement is more worthy of clinical application due to its advantages of less impact on the preservation of the palatal alveolar ridge height of the maxillary anterior teeth, shorter tooth extraction time, postoperative pain-free rate and high final satisfaction rate. Professional Medical Publications 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10025688/ /pubmed/36950395 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jiang, Si Zhou, Biao Li, Zheng Gao, Juan Wang, Pei Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth |
title | Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth |
title_full | Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth |
title_short | Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth |
title_sort | comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950395 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangsi comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth AT zhoubiao comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth AT lizheng comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth AT gaojuan comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth AT wangpei comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth |