Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Si, Zhou, Biao, Li, Zheng, Gao, Juan, Wang, Pei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950395
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643
_version_ 1784909389843398656
author Jiang, Si
Zhou, Biao
Li, Zheng
Gao, Juan
Wang, Pei
author_facet Jiang, Si
Zhou, Biao
Li, Zheng
Gao, Juan
Wang, Pei
author_sort Jiang, Si
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group-A were extracted by high-speed turbodrill root extraction, while Group-B were extracted by piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement. After extraction, GBR bone grafting and soft tissue transplantation were performed on the extraction sockets. The extraction time, integrity rate of labial bone plate of the extraction socket, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate, reduction of the height and width of the alveolar ridge, alveolar bone mineral density score, and new bone contour score of the alveolar bone of two groups were compared. RESULT: Group-B was significantly superior to Group-A in terms of tooth extraction time, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate and reduction of alveolar ridge height at three sites on the palatal side, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement is more worthy of clinical application due to its advantages of less impact on the preservation of the palatal alveolar ridge height of the maxillary anterior teeth, shorter tooth extraction time, postoperative pain-free rate and high final satisfaction rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10025688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100256882023-03-21 Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Jiang, Si Zhou, Biao Li, Zheng Gao, Juan Wang, Pei Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group-A were extracted by high-speed turbodrill root extraction, while Group-B were extracted by piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement. After extraction, GBR bone grafting and soft tissue transplantation were performed on the extraction sockets. The extraction time, integrity rate of labial bone plate of the extraction socket, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate, reduction of the height and width of the alveolar ridge, alveolar bone mineral density score, and new bone contour score of the alveolar bone of two groups were compared. RESULT: Group-B was significantly superior to Group-A in terms of tooth extraction time, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate and reduction of alveolar ridge height at three sites on the palatal side, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement is more worthy of clinical application due to its advantages of less impact on the preservation of the palatal alveolar ridge height of the maxillary anterior teeth, shorter tooth extraction time, postoperative pain-free rate and high final satisfaction rate. Professional Medical Publications 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10025688/ /pubmed/36950395 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jiang, Si
Zhou, Biao
Li, Zheng
Gao, Juan
Wang, Pei
Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
title Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
title_full Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
title_short Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
title_sort comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950395
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangsi comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth
AT zhoubiao comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth
AT lizheng comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth
AT gaojuan comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth
AT wangpei comparisonoftheeffectsoftwoextractionmethodsonthealveolarridgepreservationofmaxillaryanteriorteeth