Cargando…

Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have suggested that mTOR pathway signaling may be a potential therapeutic target for childhood ependymoma. METHODS: A phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02155920) of single-agent everolimus was performed to test the hypothesis that mTOR pathway...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowers, Daniel C, Rajaram, Veena, Karajannis, Matthias A, Gardner, Sharon L, Su, Jack Meng-Fen, Baxter, Patricia, Partap, Sonia, Klesse, Laura J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad011
_version_ 1784909418472669184
author Bowers, Daniel C
Rajaram, Veena
Karajannis, Matthias A
Gardner, Sharon L
Su, Jack Meng-Fen
Baxter, Patricia
Partap, Sonia
Klesse, Laura J
author_facet Bowers, Daniel C
Rajaram, Veena
Karajannis, Matthias A
Gardner, Sharon L
Su, Jack Meng-Fen
Baxter, Patricia
Partap, Sonia
Klesse, Laura J
author_sort Bowers, Daniel C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have suggested that mTOR pathway signaling may be a potential therapeutic target for childhood ependymoma. METHODS: A phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02155920) of single-agent everolimus was performed to test the hypothesis that mTOR pathway inhibition would result in tumor responses for children with recurrent and/or progressive ependymomas. RESULTS: Eleven subjects [sex: 4 females (36.4%); median age: 8 years (range: 2-15 years); race: 9 white; prior therapies: median 6 (range: 3-9)] were enrolled on the study. Ten primary tumors were located in the posterior fossa and one primary tumor was located in the spinal cord. Eight of 9 tumors were PF-A subtype epenydmomas. All subjects were treated with oral everolimus 4.5 mg/m(2)/day (each cycle = 28 days) that was titrated to achieve serum trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml. Overall, everolimus was well tolerated; except for a single event of grade 3 pneumonia, all adverse events were grade 1-2. No objective tumor responses were observed. Participating subjects experienced tumor progression and discontinued therapy after a median of 2 cycles of therapy (1 cycle = 2; 2 cycles = 6; 3, 4, and 8 cycles = 1 each). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus does not appear to have activity for children with recurrent or progressive PF-A ependymoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10025810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100258102023-03-21 Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma Bowers, Daniel C Rajaram, Veena Karajannis, Matthias A Gardner, Sharon L Su, Jack Meng-Fen Baxter, Patricia Partap, Sonia Klesse, Laura J Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have suggested that mTOR pathway signaling may be a potential therapeutic target for childhood ependymoma. METHODS: A phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02155920) of single-agent everolimus was performed to test the hypothesis that mTOR pathway inhibition would result in tumor responses for children with recurrent and/or progressive ependymomas. RESULTS: Eleven subjects [sex: 4 females (36.4%); median age: 8 years (range: 2-15 years); race: 9 white; prior therapies: median 6 (range: 3-9)] were enrolled on the study. Ten primary tumors were located in the posterior fossa and one primary tumor was located in the spinal cord. Eight of 9 tumors were PF-A subtype epenydmomas. All subjects were treated with oral everolimus 4.5 mg/m(2)/day (each cycle = 28 days) that was titrated to achieve serum trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml. Overall, everolimus was well tolerated; except for a single event of grade 3 pneumonia, all adverse events were grade 1-2. No objective tumor responses were observed. Participating subjects experienced tumor progression and discontinued therapy after a median of 2 cycles of therapy (1 cycle = 2; 2 cycles = 6; 3, 4, and 8 cycles = 1 each). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus does not appear to have activity for children with recurrent or progressive PF-A ependymoma. Oxford University Press 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10025810/ /pubmed/36950217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad011 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Bowers, Daniel C
Rajaram, Veena
Karajannis, Matthias A
Gardner, Sharon L
Su, Jack Meng-Fen
Baxter, Patricia
Partap, Sonia
Klesse, Laura J
Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
title Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
title_full Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
title_fullStr Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
title_full_unstemmed Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
title_short Phase II study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
title_sort phase ii study of everolimus for recurrent or progressive pediatric ependymoma
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad011
work_keys_str_mv AT bowersdanielc phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT rajaramveena phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT karajannismatthiasa phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT gardnersharonl phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT sujackmengfen phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT baxterpatricia phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT partapsonia phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma
AT klesselauraj phaseiistudyofeverolimusforrecurrentorprogressivepediatricependymoma