Cargando…

Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This is due to the nonspecific symptoms and no effective screening methods. Currently, carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA125) is used as a tumor biomarker for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, but it has its own limitations. Henc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rani, Shikha, Sehgal, Alka, Kaur, Jasbinder, Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur, Punia, Rajpal Singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_52_22
_version_ 1784909421673971712
author Rani, Shikha
Sehgal, Alka
Kaur, Jasbinder
Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur
Punia, Rajpal Singh
author_facet Rani, Shikha
Sehgal, Alka
Kaur, Jasbinder
Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur
Punia, Rajpal Singh
author_sort Rani, Shikha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This is due to the nonspecific symptoms and no effective screening methods. Currently, carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA125) is used as a tumor biomarker for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, but it has its own limitations. Hence, there is a need for other tumor biomarkers for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of plasma osteopontin (OPN) in detecting ovarian malignancy and comparing its performance with CA125. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional diagnostic test evaluation. Women with adnexal mass detected by clinical or radiological examination were enrolled as suspected cases. Women who presented with other gynecological conditions were enrolled as controls. OPN and CA125 levels were measured in all enrolled subjects. RESULTS: Among 106 women enrolled, 26 were ovarian cancer, 31 had benign ovarian masses, and 49 were controls. Median plasma CA125 levels were higher in subjects with ovarian cancer (298 U/ml; interquartile range [IQR]: 84–1082 U/ml vs. 37.5U/ml; IQR: 17.6–82.9U/ml; P < 0.001). CA125 sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were 88.5%, 61.3%, 2.10, and 0.19, respectively. Median plasma OPN levels were higher in subjects with ovarian cancer (63.1 ng/ml; IQR: 39.3–137 ng/ml vs. 27 ng/ml; IQR: 20–52 ng/ml; P = 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios of OPN were 50%, 87%, 2.58, and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSION: OPN levels were higher in ovarian cancer than in the benign ovarian mass and had better specificity than CA125. OPN can better differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian mass as compared to CA125.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10025823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100258232023-03-21 Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer Rani, Shikha Sehgal, Alka Kaur, Jasbinder Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur Punia, Rajpal Singh J Midlife Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This is due to the nonspecific symptoms and no effective screening methods. Currently, carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA125) is used as a tumor biomarker for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, but it has its own limitations. Hence, there is a need for other tumor biomarkers for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of plasma osteopontin (OPN) in detecting ovarian malignancy and comparing its performance with CA125. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional diagnostic test evaluation. Women with adnexal mass detected by clinical or radiological examination were enrolled as suspected cases. Women who presented with other gynecological conditions were enrolled as controls. OPN and CA125 levels were measured in all enrolled subjects. RESULTS: Among 106 women enrolled, 26 were ovarian cancer, 31 had benign ovarian masses, and 49 were controls. Median plasma CA125 levels were higher in subjects with ovarian cancer (298 U/ml; interquartile range [IQR]: 84–1082 U/ml vs. 37.5U/ml; IQR: 17.6–82.9U/ml; P < 0.001). CA125 sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were 88.5%, 61.3%, 2.10, and 0.19, respectively. Median plasma OPN levels were higher in subjects with ovarian cancer (63.1 ng/ml; IQR: 39.3–137 ng/ml vs. 27 ng/ml; IQR: 20–52 ng/ml; P = 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios of OPN were 50%, 87%, 2.58, and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSION: OPN levels were higher in ovarian cancer than in the benign ovarian mass and had better specificity than CA125. OPN can better differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian mass as compared to CA125. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10025823/ /pubmed/36950209 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_52_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Mid-life Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rani, Shikha
Sehgal, Alka
Kaur, Jasbinder
Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur
Punia, Rajpal Singh
Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer
title Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer
title_full Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer
title_fullStr Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer
title_short Osteopontin as a Tumor Marker in Ovarian Cancer
title_sort osteopontin as a tumor marker in ovarian cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_52_22
work_keys_str_mv AT ranishikha osteopontinasatumormarkerinovariancancer
AT sehgalalka osteopontinasatumormarkerinovariancancer
AT kaurjasbinder osteopontinasatumormarkerinovariancancer
AT pandherdilpreetkaur osteopontinasatumormarkerinovariancancer
AT puniarajpalsingh osteopontinasatumormarkerinovariancancer