Cargando…

Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Effective management of frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) remains challenging. Case management (CM) has shown to improve patient quality of life while reducing ED visits and associated costs. However, little data is available on FUED’s perception of CM outside of North Ameri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaad, Luana, Graells, Madison, Kasztura, Miriam, Schmutz, Elodie, Moullin, Joanna, Hugli, Olivier, Daeppen, Jean-Bernard, Ambrosetti, Julia, Ombelli, Julien, Golay, Michel, Ribordy, Vincent, Grazioli, Véronique S., Bodenmann, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580231159745
_version_ 1784909482843701248
author Schaad, Luana
Graells, Madison
Kasztura, Miriam
Schmutz, Elodie
Moullin, Joanna
Hugli, Olivier
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Ambrosetti, Julia
Ombelli, Julien
Golay, Michel
Ribordy, Vincent
Grazioli, Véronique S.
Bodenmann, Patrick
author_facet Schaad, Luana
Graells, Madison
Kasztura, Miriam
Schmutz, Elodie
Moullin, Joanna
Hugli, Olivier
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Ambrosetti, Julia
Ombelli, Julien
Golay, Michel
Ribordy, Vincent
Grazioli, Véronique S.
Bodenmann, Patrick
author_sort Schaad, Luana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective management of frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) remains challenging. Case management (CM) has shown to improve patient quality of life while reducing ED visits and associated costs. However, little data is available on FUED’s perception of CM outside of North America to further improve CM implementation. OBJECTIVES: Explore the FUED’s perspectives about CM in Switzerland. DESIGN, SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews eliciting FUED’s experiences of CM were conducted among 20 participants (75% female; mean age = 40.6, SD = 12.8) across 6 hospital ED. OUTCOMES MEASURES & ANALYSIS: Inductive content analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Most participants were satisfied with the CM program. In particular, FUEDs identified the working relationship with the case manager (cm) as key for positive outcomes, and also valued the holistic evaluation of their needs and resources. Overall, patients reported increased motivation and health literacy, as well as facilitated interactions within the healthcare system. Conversely, a small number of participants reported negative views on CM (ie, stigmatization, lack of concrete outcomes). Barriers identified were cm’s lack of time, COVID-19′s negative impact on CM organization, as well as lack of clarity on the objectives of CM. FUED perceived CM as useful, in particular establishing a working relationship with the cm. Our results suggest that CM can be further improved by (1) professionals remaining non-judgmental toward FUED, (2) making sure the aims and objectives of the CM are understood by the participants, and (3) allowing more time for the cm to carry out their work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100261452023-03-21 Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study Schaad, Luana Graells, Madison Kasztura, Miriam Schmutz, Elodie Moullin, Joanna Hugli, Olivier Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Ambrosetti, Julia Ombelli, Julien Golay, Michel Ribordy, Vincent Grazioli, Véronique S. Bodenmann, Patrick Inquiry Original Research BACKGROUND: Effective management of frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) remains challenging. Case management (CM) has shown to improve patient quality of life while reducing ED visits and associated costs. However, little data is available on FUED’s perception of CM outside of North America to further improve CM implementation. OBJECTIVES: Explore the FUED’s perspectives about CM in Switzerland. DESIGN, SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews eliciting FUED’s experiences of CM were conducted among 20 participants (75% female; mean age = 40.6, SD = 12.8) across 6 hospital ED. OUTCOMES MEASURES & ANALYSIS: Inductive content analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Most participants were satisfied with the CM program. In particular, FUEDs identified the working relationship with the case manager (cm) as key for positive outcomes, and also valued the holistic evaluation of their needs and resources. Overall, patients reported increased motivation and health literacy, as well as facilitated interactions within the healthcare system. Conversely, a small number of participants reported negative views on CM (ie, stigmatization, lack of concrete outcomes). Barriers identified were cm’s lack of time, COVID-19′s negative impact on CM organization, as well as lack of clarity on the objectives of CM. FUED perceived CM as useful, in particular establishing a working relationship with the cm. Our results suggest that CM can be further improved by (1) professionals remaining non-judgmental toward FUED, (2) making sure the aims and objectives of the CM are understood by the participants, and (3) allowing more time for the cm to carry out their work. SAGE Publications 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10026145/ /pubmed/36927138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580231159745 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Schaad, Luana
Graells, Madison
Kasztura, Miriam
Schmutz, Elodie
Moullin, Joanna
Hugli, Olivier
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Ambrosetti, Julia
Ombelli, Julien
Golay, Michel
Ribordy, Vincent
Grazioli, Véronique S.
Bodenmann, Patrick
Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study
title Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study
title_full Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study
title_short Perspectives of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments on a Case Management Intervention: A Qualitative Study
title_sort perspectives of frequent users of emergency departments on a case management intervention: a qualitative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580231159745
work_keys_str_mv AT schaadluana perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT graellsmadison perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT kaszturamiriam perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT schmutzelodie perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT moullinjoanna perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT hugliolivier perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT daeppenjeanbernard perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT ambrosettijulia perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT ombellijulien perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT golaymichel perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT ribordyvincent perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT grazioliveroniques perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy
AT bodenmannpatrick perspectivesoffrequentusersofemergencydepartmentsonacasemanagementinterventionaqualitativestudy