Cargando…

ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slater, Susanna, Bryant, Annette, Chen, Hsiang-Chi, Begum, Ruwaida, Rana, Isma, Aresu, Maria, Peckitt, Clare, Zhitkov, Oleg, Lazaro-Alcausi, Retchel, Borja, Victoria, Powell, Rachel, Lowery, David, Hubank, Michael, Rich, Thereasa, Anandappa, Gayathri, Chau, Ian, Starling, Naureen, Cunningham, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4
_version_ 1784909540703076352
author Slater, Susanna
Bryant, Annette
Chen, Hsiang-Chi
Begum, Ruwaida
Rana, Isma
Aresu, Maria
Peckitt, Clare
Zhitkov, Oleg
Lazaro-Alcausi, Retchel
Borja, Victoria
Powell, Rachel
Lowery, David
Hubank, Michael
Rich, Thereasa
Anandappa, Gayathri
Chau, Ian
Starling, Naureen
Cunningham, David
author_facet Slater, Susanna
Bryant, Annette
Chen, Hsiang-Chi
Begum, Ruwaida
Rana, Isma
Aresu, Maria
Peckitt, Clare
Zhitkov, Oleg
Lazaro-Alcausi, Retchel
Borja, Victoria
Powell, Rachel
Lowery, David
Hubank, Michael
Rich, Thereasa
Anandappa, Gayathri
Chau, Ian
Starling, Naureen
Cunningham, David
author_sort Slater, Susanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK’s first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022. DISCUSSION: The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04050345.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100264392023-03-21 ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C) Slater, Susanna Bryant, Annette Chen, Hsiang-Chi Begum, Ruwaida Rana, Isma Aresu, Maria Peckitt, Clare Zhitkov, Oleg Lazaro-Alcausi, Retchel Borja, Victoria Powell, Rachel Lowery, David Hubank, Michael Rich, Thereasa Anandappa, Gayathri Chau, Ian Starling, Naureen Cunningham, David BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK’s first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022. DISCUSSION: The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04050345. BioMed Central 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10026439/ /pubmed/36941575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Slater, Susanna
Bryant, Annette
Chen, Hsiang-Chi
Begum, Ruwaida
Rana, Isma
Aresu, Maria
Peckitt, Clare
Zhitkov, Oleg
Lazaro-Alcausi, Retchel
Borja, Victoria
Powell, Rachel
Lowery, David
Hubank, Michael
Rich, Thereasa
Anandappa, Gayathri
Chau, Ian
Starling, Naureen
Cunningham, David
ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_full ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_fullStr ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_full_unstemmed ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_short ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C)
title_sort ctdna guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage ii or stage iii colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (tracc part c)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4
work_keys_str_mv AT slatersusanna ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT bryantannette ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT chenhsiangchi ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT begumruwaida ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT ranaisma ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT aresumaria ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT peckittclare ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT zhitkovoleg ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT lazaroalcausiretchel ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT borjavictoria ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT powellrachel ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT lowerydavid ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT hubankmichael ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT richthereasa ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT anandappagayathri ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT chauian ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT starlingnaureen ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc
AT cunninghamdavid ctdnaguidedadjuvantchemotherapyversusstandardofcareadjuvantchemotherapyaftercurativesurgeryinpatientswithhighriskstageiiorstageiiicolorectalcanceramulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontroltrialtraccpartc