Cargando…

Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?

Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitole, Felician Andrew, Lihawa, Robert Michael, Mkuna, Eliaza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0
_version_ 1784909543325564928
author Kitole, Felician Andrew
Lihawa, Robert Michael
Mkuna, Eliaza
author_facet Kitole, Felician Andrew
Lihawa, Robert Michael
Mkuna, Eliaza
author_sort Kitole, Felician Andrew
collection PubMed
description Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has low health insurance coverage, hindering its efforts to achieve universal health coverage. This study examines the role of equity in public social healthcare protection and its effects on household healthcare financing in Tanzania. The study used secondary data collected from the National Bureau of Statistics' National Panel Survey 2020/21 and stratified households based on their place of residence (rural vs. urban). Moreover, the logit regression model, ordered logit, and the endogenous switching regression model were used to provide counterfactual estimates without selection bias and endogeneity problems. The results showed greater variations in social health protection across rural and urban households, increasing disparities in health outcomes between these areas. Rural residents are the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, education, income, and direct healthcare costs significantly influence equity in healthcare financing and the ability of households to benefit from public social healthcare protection schemes. To achieve equity in healthcare in rural and urban areas, developing countries need to increase investment in health sector by reducing the cost of healthcare, which will significantly reduce household healthcare financing. Furthermore, the study recommends that social health protection is an essential strategy for improving fair access to quality healthcare by removing differences across households and promoting equality in utilizing healthcare services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100264482023-03-21 Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? Kitole, Felician Andrew Lihawa, Robert Michael Mkuna, Eliaza Int J Equity Health Research Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has low health insurance coverage, hindering its efforts to achieve universal health coverage. This study examines the role of equity in public social healthcare protection and its effects on household healthcare financing in Tanzania. The study used secondary data collected from the National Bureau of Statistics' National Panel Survey 2020/21 and stratified households based on their place of residence (rural vs. urban). Moreover, the logit regression model, ordered logit, and the endogenous switching regression model were used to provide counterfactual estimates without selection bias and endogeneity problems. The results showed greater variations in social health protection across rural and urban households, increasing disparities in health outcomes between these areas. Rural residents are the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, education, income, and direct healthcare costs significantly influence equity in healthcare financing and the ability of households to benefit from public social healthcare protection schemes. To achieve equity in healthcare in rural and urban areas, developing countries need to increase investment in health sector by reducing the cost of healthcare, which will significantly reduce household healthcare financing. Furthermore, the study recommends that social health protection is an essential strategy for improving fair access to quality healthcare by removing differences across households and promoting equality in utilizing healthcare services. BioMed Central 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10026448/ /pubmed/36941603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kitole, Felician Andrew
Lihawa, Robert Michael
Mkuna, Eliaza
Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
title Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
title_full Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
title_fullStr Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
title_full_unstemmed Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
title_short Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
title_sort equity in the public social healthcare protection in tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kitolefelicianandrew equityinthepublicsocialhealthcareprotectionintanzaniadoesitmatteronhouseholdhealthcarefinancing
AT lihawarobertmichael equityinthepublicsocialhealthcareprotectionintanzaniadoesitmatteronhouseholdhealthcarefinancing
AT mkunaeliaza equityinthepublicsocialhealthcareprotectionintanzaniadoesitmatteronhouseholdhealthcarefinancing