Cargando…
Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0 |
_version_ | 1784909543325564928 |
---|---|
author | Kitole, Felician Andrew Lihawa, Robert Michael Mkuna, Eliaza |
author_facet | Kitole, Felician Andrew Lihawa, Robert Michael Mkuna, Eliaza |
author_sort | Kitole, Felician Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has low health insurance coverage, hindering its efforts to achieve universal health coverage. This study examines the role of equity in public social healthcare protection and its effects on household healthcare financing in Tanzania. The study used secondary data collected from the National Bureau of Statistics' National Panel Survey 2020/21 and stratified households based on their place of residence (rural vs. urban). Moreover, the logit regression model, ordered logit, and the endogenous switching regression model were used to provide counterfactual estimates without selection bias and endogeneity problems. The results showed greater variations in social health protection across rural and urban households, increasing disparities in health outcomes between these areas. Rural residents are the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, education, income, and direct healthcare costs significantly influence equity in healthcare financing and the ability of households to benefit from public social healthcare protection schemes. To achieve equity in healthcare in rural and urban areas, developing countries need to increase investment in health sector by reducing the cost of healthcare, which will significantly reduce household healthcare financing. Furthermore, the study recommends that social health protection is an essential strategy for improving fair access to quality healthcare by removing differences across households and promoting equality in utilizing healthcare services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10026448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100264482023-03-21 Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? Kitole, Felician Andrew Lihawa, Robert Michael Mkuna, Eliaza Int J Equity Health Research Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has low health insurance coverage, hindering its efforts to achieve universal health coverage. This study examines the role of equity in public social healthcare protection and its effects on household healthcare financing in Tanzania. The study used secondary data collected from the National Bureau of Statistics' National Panel Survey 2020/21 and stratified households based on their place of residence (rural vs. urban). Moreover, the logit regression model, ordered logit, and the endogenous switching regression model were used to provide counterfactual estimates without selection bias and endogeneity problems. The results showed greater variations in social health protection across rural and urban households, increasing disparities in health outcomes between these areas. Rural residents are the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, education, income, and direct healthcare costs significantly influence equity in healthcare financing and the ability of households to benefit from public social healthcare protection schemes. To achieve equity in healthcare in rural and urban areas, developing countries need to increase investment in health sector by reducing the cost of healthcare, which will significantly reduce household healthcare financing. Furthermore, the study recommends that social health protection is an essential strategy for improving fair access to quality healthcare by removing differences across households and promoting equality in utilizing healthcare services. BioMed Central 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10026448/ /pubmed/36941603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kitole, Felician Andrew Lihawa, Robert Michael Mkuna, Eliaza Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
title | Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
title_full | Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
title_fullStr | Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
title_short | Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
title_sort | equity in the public social healthcare protection in tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitolefelicianandrew equityinthepublicsocialhealthcareprotectionintanzaniadoesitmatteronhouseholdhealthcarefinancing AT lihawarobertmichael equityinthepublicsocialhealthcareprotectionintanzaniadoesitmatteronhouseholdhealthcarefinancing AT mkunaeliaza equityinthepublicsocialhealthcareprotectionintanzaniadoesitmatteronhouseholdhealthcarefinancing |