Cargando…

Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification

BACKGROUND: Classifying fever of unknown origin (FUO) into categorical etiologies (ie, infections, noninfectious inflammatory, oncologic, miscellaneous, and undiagnosed disorders) remains unstandardized and subject to discrepancies. As some disease classifications change, a systematic review of stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, William F, Wang, Jiangxia, Auwaerter, Paul G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad104
_version_ 1784909563790622720
author Wright, William F
Wang, Jiangxia
Auwaerter, Paul G
author_facet Wright, William F
Wang, Jiangxia
Auwaerter, Paul G
author_sort Wright, William F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Classifying fever of unknown origin (FUO) into categorical etiologies (ie, infections, noninfectious inflammatory, oncologic, miscellaneous, and undiagnosed disorders) remains unstandardized and subject to discrepancies. As some disease classifications change, a systematic review of studies would help physicians anticipate the frequency of illness types they may encounter that could influence care. METHODS: We systematically reviewed prospective FUO studies published across the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 1997, to July 31, 2022. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate associated pooled proportions between the investigator-determined choice of disease category and those determined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10), methodology. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a difference between the investigator and ICD-10-adjusted noninfectious inflammatory disorder category was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.005–0.021; P < .001), and the proportion was similar for the miscellaneous category at 1.5% (95% CI, 0.007–0.025; P < .001). The miscellaneous and noninfectious inflammatory disorders categories demonstrated significant across-study heterogeneity in the proportions of patients changing categories, with 52.7% (P = .007) and 51.0% (P = .010) I(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting FUO-associated diagnoses by ICD-10 methodology was associated with a statistically significant risk of over- or underestimation of disease category frequency approximation when using a 5 FUO category system. An FUO diagnostic classification system that better reflects mechanistic understanding would assist future research and enhance comparability across heterogenous populations and different geographic regions. We propose an updated FUO classification scheme that streamlines categorizations, aligns with the current understanding of disease mechanisms, and should facilitate empirical decisions, if necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100265472023-03-21 Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification Wright, William F Wang, Jiangxia Auwaerter, Paul G Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Classifying fever of unknown origin (FUO) into categorical etiologies (ie, infections, noninfectious inflammatory, oncologic, miscellaneous, and undiagnosed disorders) remains unstandardized and subject to discrepancies. As some disease classifications change, a systematic review of studies would help physicians anticipate the frequency of illness types they may encounter that could influence care. METHODS: We systematically reviewed prospective FUO studies published across the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 1997, to July 31, 2022. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate associated pooled proportions between the investigator-determined choice of disease category and those determined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10), methodology. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a difference between the investigator and ICD-10-adjusted noninfectious inflammatory disorder category was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.005–0.021; P < .001), and the proportion was similar for the miscellaneous category at 1.5% (95% CI, 0.007–0.025; P < .001). The miscellaneous and noninfectious inflammatory disorders categories demonstrated significant across-study heterogeneity in the proportions of patients changing categories, with 52.7% (P = .007) and 51.0% (P = .010) I(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting FUO-associated diagnoses by ICD-10 methodology was associated with a statistically significant risk of over- or underestimation of disease category frequency approximation when using a 5 FUO category system. An FUO diagnostic classification system that better reflects mechanistic understanding would assist future research and enhance comparability across heterogenous populations and different geographic regions. We propose an updated FUO classification scheme that streamlines categorizations, aligns with the current understanding of disease mechanisms, and should facilitate empirical decisions, if necessary. Oxford University Press 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10026547/ /pubmed/36949875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad104 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Major Article
Wright, William F
Wang, Jiangxia
Auwaerter, Paul G
Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification
title Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification
title_full Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification
title_fullStr Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification
title_full_unstemmed Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification
title_short Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification
title_sort investigator-determined categories for fever of unknown origin (fuo) compared with international classification of diseases–10 classification of illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a proposal for revised fuo classification
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad104
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightwilliamf investigatordeterminedcategoriesforfeverofunknownoriginfuocomparedwithinternationalclassificationofdiseases10classificationofillnessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithaproposalforrevisedfuoclassification
AT wangjiangxia investigatordeterminedcategoriesforfeverofunknownoriginfuocomparedwithinternationalclassificationofdiseases10classificationofillnessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithaproposalforrevisedfuoclassification
AT auwaerterpaulg investigatordeterminedcategoriesforfeverofunknownoriginfuocomparedwithinternationalclassificationofdiseases10classificationofillnessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithaproposalforrevisedfuoclassification