Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review

To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biasio, Luigi Roberto, Zanobini, Patrizio, Lorini, Chiara, Monaci, Pietro, Fanfani, Alice, Gallinoro, Veronica, Cerini, Gabriele, Albora, Giuseppe, Del Riccio, Marco, Pecorelli, Sergio, Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083
_version_ 1784909611055185920
author Biasio, Luigi Roberto
Zanobini, Patrizio
Lorini, Chiara
Monaci, Pietro
Fanfani, Alice
Gallinoro, Veronica
Cerini, Gabriele
Albora, Giuseppe
Del Riccio, Marco
Pecorelli, Sergio
Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo
author_facet Biasio, Luigi Roberto
Zanobini, Patrizio
Lorini, Chiara
Monaci, Pietro
Fanfani, Alice
Gallinoro, Veronica
Cerini, Gabriele
Albora, Giuseppe
Del Riccio, Marco
Pecorelli, Sergio
Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo
author_sort Biasio, Luigi Roberto
collection PubMed
description To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles published between January 2020 and October 2022: 26 papers were identified using these tools in the context of COVID-19. Descriptive analysis showed that the levels of VL observed in the studies were generally in agreement, with functional VL score often lower than the interactive-critical dimension, as if the latter was stimulated by the COVID-19-related infodemic. Factors associated with VL included vaccination status, age, educational level, and, possibly, gender. Effective communication based on VL when promoting vaccination is critical to sustaining immunization against COVID-19 and other communicable diseases. The VL scales developed to date have shown good consistency. However, further research is needed to improve these tools and develop new ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100268962023-03-21 COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review Biasio, Luigi Roberto Zanobini, Patrizio Lorini, Chiara Monaci, Pietro Fanfani, Alice Gallinoro, Veronica Cerini, Gabriele Albora, Giuseppe Del Riccio, Marco Pecorelli, Sergio Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo Hum Vaccin Immunother Coronavirus To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles published between January 2020 and October 2022: 26 papers were identified using these tools in the context of COVID-19. Descriptive analysis showed that the levels of VL observed in the studies were generally in agreement, with functional VL score often lower than the interactive-critical dimension, as if the latter was stimulated by the COVID-19-related infodemic. Factors associated with VL included vaccination status, age, educational level, and, possibly, gender. Effective communication based on VL when promoting vaccination is critical to sustaining immunization against COVID-19 and other communicable diseases. The VL scales developed to date have shown good consistency. However, further research is needed to improve these tools and develop new ones. Taylor & Francis 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10026896/ /pubmed/36794338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Coronavirus
Biasio, Luigi Roberto
Zanobini, Patrizio
Lorini, Chiara
Monaci, Pietro
Fanfani, Alice
Gallinoro, Veronica
Cerini, Gabriele
Albora, Giuseppe
Del Riccio, Marco
Pecorelli, Sergio
Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo
COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review
title COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review
title_full COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review
title_short COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review
title_sort covid-19 vaccine literacy: a scoping review
topic Coronavirus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083
work_keys_str_mv AT biasioluigiroberto covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT zanobinipatrizio covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT lorinichiara covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT monacipietro covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT fanfanialice covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT gallinoroveronica covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT cerinigabriele covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT alboragiuseppe covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT delricciomarco covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT pecorellisergio covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview
AT bonaccorsiguglielmo covid19vaccineliteracyascopingreview