Cargando…

Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Lu, Tian, Hongyan, Lin, Dongmei, Zhao, Liang, Wang, Hui, Hao, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005080
_version_ 1784909629821550592
author Liu, Lu
Tian, Hongyan
Lin, Dongmei
Zhao, Liang
Wang, Hui
Hao, Yi
author_facet Liu, Lu
Tian, Hongyan
Lin, Dongmei
Zhao, Liang
Wang, Hui
Hao, Yi
author_sort Liu, Lu
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: “adenomyosis,” “recurrence,” “reintervention,” “relapse,” and “recur.” METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9–16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4–41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6–14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9–4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2–18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6–11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses. CONCLUSION: Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021261289.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100269772023-03-21 Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Liu, Lu Tian, Hongyan Lin, Dongmei Zhao, Liang Wang, Hui Hao, Yi Obstet Gynecol Commentary To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: “adenomyosis,” “recurrence,” “reintervention,” “relapse,” and “recur.” METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9–16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4–41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6–14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9–4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2–18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6–11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses. CONCLUSION: Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021261289. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10026977/ /pubmed/36897132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005080 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Commentary
Liu, Lu
Tian, Hongyan
Lin, Dongmei
Zhao, Liang
Wang, Hui
Hao, Yi
Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005080
work_keys_str_mv AT liulu riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianhongyan riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lindongmei riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoliang riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghui riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haoyi riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis