Cargando…
Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005080 |
_version_ | 1784909629821550592 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Lu Tian, Hongyan Lin, Dongmei Zhao, Liang Wang, Hui Hao, Yi |
author_facet | Liu, Lu Tian, Hongyan Lin, Dongmei Zhao, Liang Wang, Hui Hao, Yi |
author_sort | Liu, Lu |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: “adenomyosis,” “recurrence,” “reintervention,” “relapse,” and “recur.” METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9–16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4–41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6–14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9–4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2–18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6–11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses. CONCLUSION: Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021261289. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10026977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100269772023-03-21 Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Liu, Lu Tian, Hongyan Lin, Dongmei Zhao, Liang Wang, Hui Hao, Yi Obstet Gynecol Commentary To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: “adenomyosis,” “recurrence,” “reintervention,” “relapse,” and “recur.” METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9–16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4–41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6–14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9–4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2–18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6–11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses. CONCLUSION: Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021261289. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10026977/ /pubmed/36897132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005080 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Liu, Lu Tian, Hongyan Lin, Dongmei Zhao, Liang Wang, Hui Hao, Yi Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liulu riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tianhongyan riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lindongmei riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaoliang riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghui riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haoyi riskofrecurrenceandreinterventionafteruterinesparinginterventionsforsymptomaticadenomyosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |