Cargando…

Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection

BACKGROUND: Spearman’s law of diminishing returns (SLODR) states that intercorrelations between scores on tests of intellectual abilities were higher when the data set was comprised of subjects with lower intellectual abilities and vice versa. After almost a hundred years of research, this trend has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korneev, Aleksei A., Krichevets, Anatoly N., Sugonyaev, Konstantin V., Ushakov, Dmitriy V., Vinogradov, Alexander G., Fomichev, Aram A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Russian Psychological Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950318
http://dx.doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0107
_version_ 1784909632324501504
author Korneev, Aleksei A.
Krichevets, Anatoly N.
Sugonyaev, Konstantin V.
Ushakov, Dmitriy V.
Vinogradov, Alexander G.
Fomichev, Aram A.
author_facet Korneev, Aleksei A.
Krichevets, Anatoly N.
Sugonyaev, Konstantin V.
Ushakov, Dmitriy V.
Vinogradov, Alexander G.
Fomichev, Aram A.
author_sort Korneev, Aleksei A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spearman’s law of diminishing returns (SLODR) states that intercorrelations between scores on tests of intellectual abilities were higher when the data set was comprised of subjects with lower intellectual abilities and vice versa. After almost a hundred years of research, this trend has only been detected on average. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the very different results were obtained due to variations in scaling and the selection of subjects. DESIGN: We used three methods for SLODR detection based on moderated factor analysis (MFCA) to test real data and three sets of simulated data. Of the latter group, the first one simulated a real SLODR effect. The second one simulated the case of a different density of tasks of varying difficulty; it did not have a real SLODR effect. The third one simulated a skewed selection of respondents with different abilities and also did not have a real SLODR effect. We selected the simulation parameters so that the correlation matrix of the simulated data was similar to the matrix created from the real data, and all distributions had similar skewness parameters (about –0.3). RESULTS: The results of MFCA are contradictory and we cannot clearly distinguish by this method the dataset with real SLODR from datasets with similar correlation structure and skewness, but without a real SLODR effect. The results allow us to conclude that when effects like SLODR are very subtle and can be identified only with a large sample, then features of the psychometric scale become very important, because small variations of scale metrics may lead either to masking of real SLODR or to false identification of SLODR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Russian Psychological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100269982023-03-21 Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection Korneev, Aleksei A. Krichevets, Anatoly N. Sugonyaev, Konstantin V. Ushakov, Dmitriy V. Vinogradov, Alexander G. Fomichev, Aram A. Psychol Russ Psychometrics BACKGROUND: Spearman’s law of diminishing returns (SLODR) states that intercorrelations between scores on tests of intellectual abilities were higher when the data set was comprised of subjects with lower intellectual abilities and vice versa. After almost a hundred years of research, this trend has only been detected on average. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the very different results were obtained due to variations in scaling and the selection of subjects. DESIGN: We used three methods for SLODR detection based on moderated factor analysis (MFCA) to test real data and three sets of simulated data. Of the latter group, the first one simulated a real SLODR effect. The second one simulated the case of a different density of tasks of varying difficulty; it did not have a real SLODR effect. The third one simulated a skewed selection of respondents with different abilities and also did not have a real SLODR effect. We selected the simulation parameters so that the correlation matrix of the simulated data was similar to the matrix created from the real data, and all distributions had similar skewness parameters (about –0.3). RESULTS: The results of MFCA are contradictory and we cannot clearly distinguish by this method the dataset with real SLODR from datasets with similar correlation structure and skewness, but without a real SLODR effect. The results allow us to conclude that when effects like SLODR are very subtle and can be identified only with a large sample, then features of the psychometric scale become very important, because small variations of scale metrics may lead either to masking of real SLODR or to false identification of SLODR. Russian Psychological Society 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10026998/ /pubmed/36950318 http://dx.doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0107 Text en © Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The journal content is licensed with CC BY-NC “Attribution-NonCommercial” Creative Commons license.
spellingShingle Psychometrics
Korneev, Aleksei A.
Krichevets, Anatoly N.
Sugonyaev, Konstantin V.
Ushakov, Dmitriy V.
Vinogradov, Alexander G.
Fomichev, Aram A.
Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection
title Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection
title_full Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection
title_fullStr Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection
title_full_unstemmed Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection
title_short Sources of Artifacts in SLODR Detection
title_sort sources of artifacts in slodr detection
topic Psychometrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950318
http://dx.doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0107
work_keys_str_mv AT korneevalekseia sourcesofartifactsinslodrdetection
AT krichevetsanatolyn sourcesofartifactsinslodrdetection
AT sugonyaevkonstantinv sourcesofartifactsinslodrdetection
AT ushakovdmitriyv sourcesofartifactsinslodrdetection
AT vinogradovalexanderg sourcesofartifactsinslodrdetection
AT fomichevarama sourcesofartifactsinslodrdetection