Cargando…
Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms
Hippocampal CA1 cells take part in reliable, time-locked activity sequences in tasks that involve an association between temporally separated stimuli, in a manner that tiles the interval between the stimuli. Such cells have been termed time cells. Here, we adopt a first-principles approach to compar...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0007-22.2023 |
_version_ | 1784909643006345216 |
---|---|
author | Ananthamurthy, Kambadur G. Bhalla, Upinder S. |
author_facet | Ananthamurthy, Kambadur G. Bhalla, Upinder S. |
author_sort | Ananthamurthy, Kambadur G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hippocampal CA1 cells take part in reliable, time-locked activity sequences in tasks that involve an association between temporally separated stimuli, in a manner that tiles the interval between the stimuli. Such cells have been termed time cells. Here, we adopt a first-principles approach to comparing diverse analysis and detection algorithms for identifying time cells. We generated synthetic activity datasets using calcium signals recorded in vivo from the mouse hippocampus using two-photon (2-P) imaging, as template response waveforms. We assigned known, ground truth values to perturbations applied to perfect activity signals, including noise, calcium event width, timing imprecision, hit trial ratio and background (untuned) activity. We tested a range of published and new algorithms and their variants on this dataset. We find that most algorithms correctly classify over 80% of cells, but have different balances between true and false positives, and different sensitivity to the five categories of perturbation. Reassuringly, most methods are reasonably robust to perturbations, including background activity, and show good concordance in classification of time cells. The same algorithms were also used to analyze and identify time cells in experimental physiology datasets recorded in vivo and most show good concordance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10027052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100270522023-03-21 Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms Ananthamurthy, Kambadur G. Bhalla, Upinder S. eNeuro Open Source Tools and Methods Hippocampal CA1 cells take part in reliable, time-locked activity sequences in tasks that involve an association between temporally separated stimuli, in a manner that tiles the interval between the stimuli. Such cells have been termed time cells. Here, we adopt a first-principles approach to comparing diverse analysis and detection algorithms for identifying time cells. We generated synthetic activity datasets using calcium signals recorded in vivo from the mouse hippocampus using two-photon (2-P) imaging, as template response waveforms. We assigned known, ground truth values to perturbations applied to perfect activity signals, including noise, calcium event width, timing imprecision, hit trial ratio and background (untuned) activity. We tested a range of published and new algorithms and their variants on this dataset. We find that most algorithms correctly classify over 80% of cells, but have different balances between true and false positives, and different sensitivity to the five categories of perturbation. Reassuringly, most methods are reasonably robust to perturbations, including background activity, and show good concordance in classification of time cells. The same algorithms were also used to analyze and identify time cells in experimental physiology datasets recorded in vivo and most show good concordance. Society for Neuroscience 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10027052/ /pubmed/36823166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0007-22.2023 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ananthamurthy and Bhalla https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Open Source Tools and Methods Ananthamurthy, Kambadur G. Bhalla, Upinder S. Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms |
title | Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms |
title_full | Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms |
title_fullStr | Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms |
title_short | Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms |
title_sort | synthetic data resource and benchmarks for time cell analysis and detection algorithms |
topic | Open Source Tools and Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0007-22.2023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ananthamurthykambadurg syntheticdataresourceandbenchmarksfortimecellanalysisanddetectionalgorithms AT bhallaupinders syntheticdataresourceandbenchmarksfortimecellanalysisanddetectionalgorithms |