Cargando…

Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators

BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is being increasingly utilized as a type of telemedicine modality to improve access to quality health care, although there are documented challenges with this type of innovation. The goals of this study were to characterize clinic delivery strategies for a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkland, Elizabeth B., Johnson, Emily, Bays, Chloe, Marsden, Justin, Verdin, Rebecca, Ford, Dee, King, Kathryn, Sterba, Katherine R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0038
_version_ 1784909703916027904
author Kirkland, Elizabeth B.
Johnson, Emily
Bays, Chloe
Marsden, Justin
Verdin, Rebecca
Ford, Dee
King, Kathryn
Sterba, Katherine R.
author_facet Kirkland, Elizabeth B.
Johnson, Emily
Bays, Chloe
Marsden, Justin
Verdin, Rebecca
Ford, Dee
King, Kathryn
Sterba, Katherine R.
author_sort Kirkland, Elizabeth B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is being increasingly utilized as a type of telemedicine modality to improve access to quality health care, although there are documented challenges with this type of innovation. The goals of this study were to characterize clinic delivery strategies for an RPM program and to examine barriers and facilitators to program implementation in a variety of community clinic settings. METHODS: Primary data were collected via individual and small group interviews and surveys of clinical staff from South Carolina primary care clinics participating in an RPM program for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in 2019. We used a parallel convergent mixed methods study design with six South Carolina primary care outpatient clinics currently participating in a diabetes remote monitoring program. Clinic staff participants completed surveys to define delivery strategies and experiences with the program in a variety of clinical settings. Interviews of clinic staff examined barriers and facilitators to program implementation guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative survey data were summarized via descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed in a template analysis approach with primary themes identified and organized by two independent coders and guided by the CFIR. Quantitative and qualitative findings were then synthesized in a final step. RESULTS: RPM program delivery strategies varied across clinic, patient population, and program domains, largely affected by staffing, leadership buy-in, resources, patient needs, and inter-site communication. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were linked to similar factors that influenced delivery strategy. DISCUSSION: RPM programs were implemented in a variety of different clinic settings with program delivery tailored to fit within each clinic's workflow and meet patients' needs. By addressing the barriers identified in this study with focused training and support strategies, delivery processes can improve implementation of RPM programs and thus benefit patient outcomes in rural and community settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10027345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100273452023-03-21 Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators Kirkland, Elizabeth B. Johnson, Emily Bays, Chloe Marsden, Justin Verdin, Rebecca Ford, Dee King, Kathryn Sterba, Katherine R. Telemed Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is being increasingly utilized as a type of telemedicine modality to improve access to quality health care, although there are documented challenges with this type of innovation. The goals of this study were to characterize clinic delivery strategies for an RPM program and to examine barriers and facilitators to program implementation in a variety of community clinic settings. METHODS: Primary data were collected via individual and small group interviews and surveys of clinical staff from South Carolina primary care clinics participating in an RPM program for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in 2019. We used a parallel convergent mixed methods study design with six South Carolina primary care outpatient clinics currently participating in a diabetes remote monitoring program. Clinic staff participants completed surveys to define delivery strategies and experiences with the program in a variety of clinical settings. Interviews of clinic staff examined barriers and facilitators to program implementation guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative survey data were summarized via descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed in a template analysis approach with primary themes identified and organized by two independent coders and guided by the CFIR. Quantitative and qualitative findings were then synthesized in a final step. RESULTS: RPM program delivery strategies varied across clinic, patient population, and program domains, largely affected by staffing, leadership buy-in, resources, patient needs, and inter-site communication. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were linked to similar factors that influenced delivery strategy. DISCUSSION: RPM programs were implemented in a variety of different clinic settings with program delivery tailored to fit within each clinic's workflow and meet patients' needs. By addressing the barriers identified in this study with focused training and support strategies, delivery processes can improve implementation of RPM programs and thus benefit patient outcomes in rural and community settings. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10027345/ /pubmed/36950477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0038 Text en © Elizabeth B. Kirkland et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kirkland, Elizabeth B.
Johnson, Emily
Bays, Chloe
Marsden, Justin
Verdin, Rebecca
Ford, Dee
King, Kathryn
Sterba, Katherine R.
Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
title Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
title_full Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
title_fullStr Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
title_short Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
title_sort diabetes remote monitoring program implementation: a mixed methods analysis of delivery strategies, barriers and facilitators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0038
work_keys_str_mv AT kirklandelizabethb diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT johnsonemily diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT bayschloe diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT marsdenjustin diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT verdinrebecca diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT forddee diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT kingkathryn diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators
AT sterbakatheriner diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators