Cargando…
Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators
BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is being increasingly utilized as a type of telemedicine modality to improve access to quality health care, although there are documented challenges with this type of innovation. The goals of this study were to characterize clinic delivery strategies for a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0038 |
_version_ | 1784909703916027904 |
---|---|
author | Kirkland, Elizabeth B. Johnson, Emily Bays, Chloe Marsden, Justin Verdin, Rebecca Ford, Dee King, Kathryn Sterba, Katherine R. |
author_facet | Kirkland, Elizabeth B. Johnson, Emily Bays, Chloe Marsden, Justin Verdin, Rebecca Ford, Dee King, Kathryn Sterba, Katherine R. |
author_sort | Kirkland, Elizabeth B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is being increasingly utilized as a type of telemedicine modality to improve access to quality health care, although there are documented challenges with this type of innovation. The goals of this study were to characterize clinic delivery strategies for an RPM program and to examine barriers and facilitators to program implementation in a variety of community clinic settings. METHODS: Primary data were collected via individual and small group interviews and surveys of clinical staff from South Carolina primary care clinics participating in an RPM program for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in 2019. We used a parallel convergent mixed methods study design with six South Carolina primary care outpatient clinics currently participating in a diabetes remote monitoring program. Clinic staff participants completed surveys to define delivery strategies and experiences with the program in a variety of clinical settings. Interviews of clinic staff examined barriers and facilitators to program implementation guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative survey data were summarized via descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed in a template analysis approach with primary themes identified and organized by two independent coders and guided by the CFIR. Quantitative and qualitative findings were then synthesized in a final step. RESULTS: RPM program delivery strategies varied across clinic, patient population, and program domains, largely affected by staffing, leadership buy-in, resources, patient needs, and inter-site communication. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were linked to similar factors that influenced delivery strategy. DISCUSSION: RPM programs were implemented in a variety of different clinic settings with program delivery tailored to fit within each clinic's workflow and meet patients' needs. By addressing the barriers identified in this study with focused training and support strategies, delivery processes can improve implementation of RPM programs and thus benefit patient outcomes in rural and community settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10027345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100273452023-03-21 Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators Kirkland, Elizabeth B. Johnson, Emily Bays, Chloe Marsden, Justin Verdin, Rebecca Ford, Dee King, Kathryn Sterba, Katherine R. Telemed Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is being increasingly utilized as a type of telemedicine modality to improve access to quality health care, although there are documented challenges with this type of innovation. The goals of this study were to characterize clinic delivery strategies for an RPM program and to examine barriers and facilitators to program implementation in a variety of community clinic settings. METHODS: Primary data were collected via individual and small group interviews and surveys of clinical staff from South Carolina primary care clinics participating in an RPM program for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in 2019. We used a parallel convergent mixed methods study design with six South Carolina primary care outpatient clinics currently participating in a diabetes remote monitoring program. Clinic staff participants completed surveys to define delivery strategies and experiences with the program in a variety of clinical settings. Interviews of clinic staff examined barriers and facilitators to program implementation guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative survey data were summarized via descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed in a template analysis approach with primary themes identified and organized by two independent coders and guided by the CFIR. Quantitative and qualitative findings were then synthesized in a final step. RESULTS: RPM program delivery strategies varied across clinic, patient population, and program domains, largely affected by staffing, leadership buy-in, resources, patient needs, and inter-site communication. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were linked to similar factors that influenced delivery strategy. DISCUSSION: RPM programs were implemented in a variety of different clinic settings with program delivery tailored to fit within each clinic's workflow and meet patients' needs. By addressing the barriers identified in this study with focused training and support strategies, delivery processes can improve implementation of RPM programs and thus benefit patient outcomes in rural and community settings. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10027345/ /pubmed/36950477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0038 Text en © Elizabeth B. Kirkland et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kirkland, Elizabeth B. Johnson, Emily Bays, Chloe Marsden, Justin Verdin, Rebecca Ford, Dee King, Kathryn Sterba, Katherine R. Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators |
title | Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators |
title_full | Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators |
title_fullStr | Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators |
title_full_unstemmed | Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators |
title_short | Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Implementation: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Delivery Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators |
title_sort | diabetes remote monitoring program implementation: a mixed methods analysis of delivery strategies, barriers and facilitators |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirklandelizabethb diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT johnsonemily diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT bayschloe diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT marsdenjustin diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT verdinrebecca diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT forddee diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT kingkathryn diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators AT sterbakatheriner diabetesremotemonitoringprogramimplementationamixedmethodsanalysisofdeliverystrategiesbarriersandfacilitators |