Cargando…

Psychometric testing of the British English Workplace Activity Limitations Scale in four rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to validate a British English version of the Workplace Activity Limitations Scale (WALS) linguistically, then test this psychometrically in RA, axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), OA and FM. METHODS: The WALS was forward translated, reviewed by an expert panel, and cognitive d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammond, Alison, Tennant, Alan, Ching, Angela, Parker, Jennifer, Prior, Yeliz, Gignac, Monique A M, Verstappen, Suzanne M M, O’Brien, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36950527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkad028
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aims were to validate a British English version of the Workplace Activity Limitations Scale (WALS) linguistically, then test this psychometrically in RA, axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), OA and FM. METHODS: The WALS was forward translated, reviewed by an expert panel, and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted. Participants completed a postal questionnaire booklet. Construct (structural) validity was examined by fit to the Rasch measurement model. Concurrent validity included testing between the WALS and the Work Limitations Questionnaire-25 (WLQ-25). Two weeks later, participants were mailed a second questionnaire booklet for test–retest reliability. RESULTS: Minor wording changes were made to the WALS, then 831 employed participants completed questionnaires: 267 men and 564 women; 53.5 (s.d. 8.9) years of age; with condition duration 7.7 (s.d. 8.0) years. The WALS satisfied Rasch model requirements, and a WALS Rasch transformation table was created. Concurrent validity was strong with the WLQ-25 (RA r(s) = 0.78; axSpA r(s) = 0.83; OA r(s) = 0.63; FM r(s) = 0.64). Internal consistency was consistent with group use (α = 0.80–0.87). Test–retest reliability was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) at ≥0.90. CONCLUSION: A reliable, valid British English version of the WALS is now available for use in the UK.