Cargando…

Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales

Abiotic factors are usually considered key drivers of species distribution at macro scales, while biotic interactions are mostly used at local scales. A few studies have explored the role of biotic interactions at macro scales, but all considered a limited number of species and obligate interactions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosentino, Francesca, Seamark, Ernest Charles James, Van Cakenberghe, Victor, Maiorano, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9855
_version_ 1784909727898009600
author Cosentino, Francesca
Seamark, Ernest Charles James
Van Cakenberghe, Victor
Maiorano, Luigi
author_facet Cosentino, Francesca
Seamark, Ernest Charles James
Van Cakenberghe, Victor
Maiorano, Luigi
author_sort Cosentino, Francesca
collection PubMed
description Abiotic factors are usually considered key drivers of species distribution at macro scales, while biotic interactions are mostly used at local scales. A few studies have explored the role of biotic interactions at macro scales, but all considered a limited number of species and obligate interactions. We examine the role of biotic interactions in large‐scale SDMs by testing two main hypotheses: (1) biotic factors in SDMs can have an important role at continental scale; (2) the inclusion of biotic factors in large‐scale SDMs is important also for generalist species. We used a maximum entropy algorithm to model the distribution of 177 bat species in Africa calibrating two SDMs for each species: one considering only abiotic variables (noBIO‐SDMs) and the other (BIO‐SDMs) including also biotic variables (trophic resource richness). We focused the interpretation of our results on variable importance and response curves. For each species, we also compared the potential distribution measuring the percentage of change between the two models in each pixel of the study area. All models gave AUC >0.7, with values on average higher in BIO‐SDMs compared to noBIO‐SDMs. Trophic resources showed an importance overall higher level than all abiotic predictors in most of the species (~68%), including generalist species. Response curves were highly interpretable in all models, confirming the ecological reliability of our models. Model comparison between the two models showed a change in potential distribution for more than 80% of the species, particularly in tropical forests and shrublands. Our results highlight the importance of considering biotic interactions in SDMs at macro scales. We demonstrated that a generic biotic proxy can be important for modeling species distribution when species‐specific data are not available, but we envision that a multi‐scale analysis combined with a better knowledge of the species might provide a better understanding of the role of biotic interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10027549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100275492023-03-22 Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales Cosentino, Francesca Seamark, Ernest Charles James Van Cakenberghe, Victor Maiorano, Luigi Ecol Evol Research Articles Abiotic factors are usually considered key drivers of species distribution at macro scales, while biotic interactions are mostly used at local scales. A few studies have explored the role of biotic interactions at macro scales, but all considered a limited number of species and obligate interactions. We examine the role of biotic interactions in large‐scale SDMs by testing two main hypotheses: (1) biotic factors in SDMs can have an important role at continental scale; (2) the inclusion of biotic factors in large‐scale SDMs is important also for generalist species. We used a maximum entropy algorithm to model the distribution of 177 bat species in Africa calibrating two SDMs for each species: one considering only abiotic variables (noBIO‐SDMs) and the other (BIO‐SDMs) including also biotic variables (trophic resource richness). We focused the interpretation of our results on variable importance and response curves. For each species, we also compared the potential distribution measuring the percentage of change between the two models in each pixel of the study area. All models gave AUC >0.7, with values on average higher in BIO‐SDMs compared to noBIO‐SDMs. Trophic resources showed an importance overall higher level than all abiotic predictors in most of the species (~68%), including generalist species. Response curves were highly interpretable in all models, confirming the ecological reliability of our models. Model comparison between the two models showed a change in potential distribution for more than 80% of the species, particularly in tropical forests and shrublands. Our results highlight the importance of considering biotic interactions in SDMs at macro scales. We demonstrated that a generic biotic proxy can be important for modeling species distribution when species‐specific data are not available, but we envision that a multi‐scale analysis combined with a better knowledge of the species might provide a better understanding of the role of biotic interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10027549/ /pubmed/36960236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9855 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Cosentino, Francesca
Seamark, Ernest Charles James
Van Cakenberghe, Victor
Maiorano, Luigi
Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
title Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
title_full Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
title_fullStr Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
title_full_unstemmed Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
title_short Not only climate: The importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
title_sort not only climate: the importance of biotic interactions in shaping species distributions at macro scales
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9855
work_keys_str_mv AT cosentinofrancesca notonlyclimatetheimportanceofbioticinteractionsinshapingspeciesdistributionsatmacroscales
AT seamarkernestcharlesjames notonlyclimatetheimportanceofbioticinteractionsinshapingspeciesdistributionsatmacroscales
AT vancakenberghevictor notonlyclimatetheimportanceofbioticinteractionsinshapingspeciesdistributionsatmacroscales
AT maioranoluigi notonlyclimatetheimportanceofbioticinteractionsinshapingspeciesdistributionsatmacroscales