Cargando…

Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model

PURPOSE: In patients with a biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), axillary staging is frequently performed, but in hindsight often turns out to be superfluous. The aim of this observational study was to develop a prediction model for risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with a biopsy-p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meurs, Claudia J. C., van Rosmalen, Joost, Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E., Siesling, Sabine, Westenend, Pieter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12900-7
_version_ 1784909743987359744
author Meurs, Claudia J. C.
van Rosmalen, Joost
Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
Siesling, Sabine
Westenend, Pieter J.
author_facet Meurs, Claudia J. C.
van Rosmalen, Joost
Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
Siesling, Sabine
Westenend, Pieter J.
author_sort Meurs, Claudia J. C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In patients with a biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), axillary staging is frequently performed, but in hindsight often turns out to be superfluous. The aim of this observational study was to develop a prediction model for risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with a biopsy-proven DCIS. METHODS: Data were received from the Dutch Pathology Databank and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The population-based cohort consisted of all biopsy-proven DCIS patients diagnosed in the Netherlands in 2011 and 2012. The prediction model was evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic, and a calibration plot and a decision curve analysis and was validated in a Dutch cohort of patients diagnosed in the period 2016–2019. RESULTS: Of 2892 biopsy-proven DCIS patients, 127 had metastasis (4.4%). Risk factors were younger age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99), DCIS not detected by screening (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.01–2.38), suspected invasive component at biopsy (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.01–3.41), palpable tumour (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.34–3.18), BI-RADS score 5 (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.53–3.78), intermediate-grade DCIS (OR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.27–7.15) and high-grade DCIS (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.36–7.54). For 24% (n = 708) of the patients, the predicted risk of lymph node metastasis was above 5%. Based on the decision curve analysis, the model had a net benefit for a predicted risk below 25%. The AUC was 0.745. Of the 2269 patients in the validation cohort, 53 (2.2%) had metastasis and the AUC was 0.741. CONCLUSIONS: This DCIS-met model can support clinical decisions on axillary staging in patients with biopsy-proven DCIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12900-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10027636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100276362023-03-22 Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model Meurs, Claudia J. C. van Rosmalen, Joost Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E. Siesling, Sabine Westenend, Pieter J. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology PURPOSE: In patients with a biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), axillary staging is frequently performed, but in hindsight often turns out to be superfluous. The aim of this observational study was to develop a prediction model for risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with a biopsy-proven DCIS. METHODS: Data were received from the Dutch Pathology Databank and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The population-based cohort consisted of all biopsy-proven DCIS patients diagnosed in the Netherlands in 2011 and 2012. The prediction model was evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic, and a calibration plot and a decision curve analysis and was validated in a Dutch cohort of patients diagnosed in the period 2016–2019. RESULTS: Of 2892 biopsy-proven DCIS patients, 127 had metastasis (4.4%). Risk factors were younger age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99), DCIS not detected by screening (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.01–2.38), suspected invasive component at biopsy (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.01–3.41), palpable tumour (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.34–3.18), BI-RADS score 5 (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.53–3.78), intermediate-grade DCIS (OR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.27–7.15) and high-grade DCIS (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.36–7.54). For 24% (n = 708) of the patients, the predicted risk of lymph node metastasis was above 5%. Based on the decision curve analysis, the model had a net benefit for a predicted risk below 25%. The AUC was 0.745. Of the 2269 patients in the validation cohort, 53 (2.2%) had metastasis and the AUC was 0.741. CONCLUSIONS: This DCIS-met model can support clinical decisions on axillary staging in patients with biopsy-proven DCIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12900-7. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10027636/ /pubmed/36496490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12900-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Meurs, Claudia J. C.
van Rosmalen, Joost
Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
Siesling, Sabine
Westenend, Pieter J.
Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model
title Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model
title_full Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model
title_fullStr Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model
title_short Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Development and Validation of the DCIS-met Model
title_sort predicting lymph node metastases in patients with biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: development and validation of the dcis-met model
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12900-7
work_keys_str_mv AT meursclaudiajc predictinglymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithbiopsyprovenductalcarcinomainsituofthebreastdevelopmentandvalidationofthedcismetmodel
AT vanrosmalenjoost predictinglymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithbiopsyprovenductalcarcinomainsituofthebreastdevelopmentandvalidationofthedcismetmodel
AT menkepluijmersmarianbe predictinglymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithbiopsyprovenductalcarcinomainsituofthebreastdevelopmentandvalidationofthedcismetmodel
AT sieslingsabine predictinglymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithbiopsyprovenductalcarcinomainsituofthebreastdevelopmentandvalidationofthedcismetmodel
AT westenendpieterj predictinglymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithbiopsyprovenductalcarcinomainsituofthebreastdevelopmentandvalidationofthedcismetmodel