Cargando…

Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX

SUMMARY: Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lan, Dempsey, Mary, Brennan, Attracta, Whelan, Bryan, Erjiang, E., Wang, Tingyan, Egan, Rebecca, Gorham, Kelly, Heaney, Fiona, Armstrong, Catherine, Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote, Gsel, Amina, Yu, Ming, Carey, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36939937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01232-y
_version_ 1784909794478391296
author Yang, Lan
Dempsey, Mary
Brennan, Attracta
Whelan, Bryan
Erjiang, E.
Wang, Tingyan
Egan, Rebecca
Gorham, Kelly
Heaney, Fiona
Armstrong, Catherine
Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote
Gsel, Amina
Yu, Ming
Carey, John J.
author_facet Yang, Lan
Dempsey, Mary
Brennan, Attracta
Whelan, Bryan
Erjiang, E.
Wang, Tingyan
Egan, Rebecca
Gorham, Kelly
Heaney, Fiona
Armstrong, Catherine
Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote
Gsel, Amina
Yu, Ming
Carey, John J.
author_sort Yang, Lan
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk estimation or interpretation in individual patients. PURPOSE: FRAX is a widely accepted tool to estimate the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in adults. Prior calibration studies suggest this works similarly with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the study is to compare within-subject differences between FRAX estimations derived using DXA and Web software with and without the inclusion of BMD. METHOD: A convenience cohort was used for this cross-sectional study, consisting of 1254 men and women aged between 40 and 90 years who had a DXA scan and complete validated data available for analysis. FRAX 10-year estimations for hip and major osteoporotic fracture were calculated using DXA software (DXA-FRAX) and the Web tool (Web-FRAX), with and without BMD. Agreements between estimates within each individual subject were examined using Bland–Altman plots. We performed exploratory analyses of the characteristics of those with very discordant results. RESULTS: Overall median DXA-FRAX and Web-FRAX 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk estimations which include BMD are very similar: 2.9% vs. 2.8% and 11.0% vs. 11% respectively. However, both are significantly lower than those obtained without BMD: 4.9% and 14% respectively, P < 0.001. Within-subject differences between hip fracture estimates with and without BMD were < 3% in 57% of cases, between 3 and 6% in 19% of cases, and > 6% in 24% of cases, while for major osteoporotic fractures such differences are < 10% in 82% of cases, between 10 and 20% in 15% of cases, and > 20% in 3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is excellent agreement between the Web-FRAX and DXA-FRAX tools when BMD is incorporated, sometimes there are very large differences for individuals between results obtained with and without BMD. Clinicians should carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in FRAX estimations when assessing individual patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10027809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100278092023-03-22 Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX Yang, Lan Dempsey, Mary Brennan, Attracta Whelan, Bryan Erjiang, E. Wang, Tingyan Egan, Rebecca Gorham, Kelly Heaney, Fiona Armstrong, Catherine Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote Gsel, Amina Yu, Ming Carey, John J. Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk estimation or interpretation in individual patients. PURPOSE: FRAX is a widely accepted tool to estimate the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in adults. Prior calibration studies suggest this works similarly with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the study is to compare within-subject differences between FRAX estimations derived using DXA and Web software with and without the inclusion of BMD. METHOD: A convenience cohort was used for this cross-sectional study, consisting of 1254 men and women aged between 40 and 90 years who had a DXA scan and complete validated data available for analysis. FRAX 10-year estimations for hip and major osteoporotic fracture were calculated using DXA software (DXA-FRAX) and the Web tool (Web-FRAX), with and without BMD. Agreements between estimates within each individual subject were examined using Bland–Altman plots. We performed exploratory analyses of the characteristics of those with very discordant results. RESULTS: Overall median DXA-FRAX and Web-FRAX 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk estimations which include BMD are very similar: 2.9% vs. 2.8% and 11.0% vs. 11% respectively. However, both are significantly lower than those obtained without BMD: 4.9% and 14% respectively, P < 0.001. Within-subject differences between hip fracture estimates with and without BMD were < 3% in 57% of cases, between 3 and 6% in 19% of cases, and > 6% in 24% of cases, while for major osteoporotic fractures such differences are < 10% in 82% of cases, between 10 and 20% in 15% of cases, and > 20% in 3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is excellent agreement between the Web-FRAX and DXA-FRAX tools when BMD is incorporated, sometimes there are very large differences for individuals between results obtained with and without BMD. Clinicians should carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in FRAX estimations when assessing individual patients. Springer London 2023-03-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10027809/ /pubmed/36939937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01232-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Lan
Dempsey, Mary
Brennan, Attracta
Whelan, Bryan
Erjiang, E.
Wang, Tingyan
Egan, Rebecca
Gorham, Kelly
Heaney, Fiona
Armstrong, Catherine
Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote
Gsel, Amina
Yu, Ming
Carey, John J.
Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
title Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
title_full Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
title_fullStr Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
title_full_unstemmed Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
title_short Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
title_sort ireland dxa-frax may differ significantly and substantially to web-frax
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36939937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01232-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglan irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT dempseymary irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT brennanattracta irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT whelanbryan irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT erjiange irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT wangtingyan irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT eganrebecca irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT gorhamkelly irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT heaneyfiona irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT armstrongcatherine irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT ibarrolaguadalupemorote irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT gselamina irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT yuming irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT careyjohnj irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax
AT irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax