Cargando…
Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX
SUMMARY: Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36939937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01232-y |
_version_ | 1784909794478391296 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Lan Dempsey, Mary Brennan, Attracta Whelan, Bryan Erjiang, E. Wang, Tingyan Egan, Rebecca Gorham, Kelly Heaney, Fiona Armstrong, Catherine Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote Gsel, Amina Yu, Ming Carey, John J. |
author_facet | Yang, Lan Dempsey, Mary Brennan, Attracta Whelan, Bryan Erjiang, E. Wang, Tingyan Egan, Rebecca Gorham, Kelly Heaney, Fiona Armstrong, Catherine Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote Gsel, Amina Yu, Ming Carey, John J. |
author_sort | Yang, Lan |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk estimation or interpretation in individual patients. PURPOSE: FRAX is a widely accepted tool to estimate the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in adults. Prior calibration studies suggest this works similarly with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the study is to compare within-subject differences between FRAX estimations derived using DXA and Web software with and without the inclusion of BMD. METHOD: A convenience cohort was used for this cross-sectional study, consisting of 1254 men and women aged between 40 and 90 years who had a DXA scan and complete validated data available for analysis. FRAX 10-year estimations for hip and major osteoporotic fracture were calculated using DXA software (DXA-FRAX) and the Web tool (Web-FRAX), with and without BMD. Agreements between estimates within each individual subject were examined using Bland–Altman plots. We performed exploratory analyses of the characteristics of those with very discordant results. RESULTS: Overall median DXA-FRAX and Web-FRAX 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk estimations which include BMD are very similar: 2.9% vs. 2.8% and 11.0% vs. 11% respectively. However, both are significantly lower than those obtained without BMD: 4.9% and 14% respectively, P < 0.001. Within-subject differences between hip fracture estimates with and without BMD were < 3% in 57% of cases, between 3 and 6% in 19% of cases, and > 6% in 24% of cases, while for major osteoporotic fractures such differences are < 10% in 82% of cases, between 10 and 20% in 15% of cases, and > 20% in 3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is excellent agreement between the Web-FRAX and DXA-FRAX tools when BMD is incorporated, sometimes there are very large differences for individuals between results obtained with and without BMD. Clinicians should carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in FRAX estimations when assessing individual patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10027809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100278092023-03-22 Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX Yang, Lan Dempsey, Mary Brennan, Attracta Whelan, Bryan Erjiang, E. Wang, Tingyan Egan, Rebecca Gorham, Kelly Heaney, Fiona Armstrong, Catherine Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote Gsel, Amina Yu, Ming Carey, John J. Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk estimation or interpretation in individual patients. PURPOSE: FRAX is a widely accepted tool to estimate the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in adults. Prior calibration studies suggest this works similarly with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the study is to compare within-subject differences between FRAX estimations derived using DXA and Web software with and without the inclusion of BMD. METHOD: A convenience cohort was used for this cross-sectional study, consisting of 1254 men and women aged between 40 and 90 years who had a DXA scan and complete validated data available for analysis. FRAX 10-year estimations for hip and major osteoporotic fracture were calculated using DXA software (DXA-FRAX) and the Web tool (Web-FRAX), with and without BMD. Agreements between estimates within each individual subject were examined using Bland–Altman plots. We performed exploratory analyses of the characteristics of those with very discordant results. RESULTS: Overall median DXA-FRAX and Web-FRAX 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk estimations which include BMD are very similar: 2.9% vs. 2.8% and 11.0% vs. 11% respectively. However, both are significantly lower than those obtained without BMD: 4.9% and 14% respectively, P < 0.001. Within-subject differences between hip fracture estimates with and without BMD were < 3% in 57% of cases, between 3 and 6% in 19% of cases, and > 6% in 24% of cases, while for major osteoporotic fractures such differences are < 10% in 82% of cases, between 10 and 20% in 15% of cases, and > 20% in 3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is excellent agreement between the Web-FRAX and DXA-FRAX tools when BMD is incorporated, sometimes there are very large differences for individuals between results obtained with and without BMD. Clinicians should carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in FRAX estimations when assessing individual patients. Springer London 2023-03-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10027809/ /pubmed/36939937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01232-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Lan Dempsey, Mary Brennan, Attracta Whelan, Bryan Erjiang, E. Wang, Tingyan Egan, Rebecca Gorham, Kelly Heaney, Fiona Armstrong, Catherine Ibarrola, Guadalupe Morote Gsel, Amina Yu, Ming Carey, John J. Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX |
title | Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX |
title_full | Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX |
title_fullStr | Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX |
title_full_unstemmed | Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX |
title_short | Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX |
title_sort | ireland dxa-frax may differ significantly and substantially to web-frax |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36939937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01232-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanglan irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT dempseymary irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT brennanattracta irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT whelanbryan irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT erjiange irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT wangtingyan irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT eganrebecca irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT gorhamkelly irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT heaneyfiona irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT armstrongcatherine irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT ibarrolaguadalupemorote irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT gselamina irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT yuming irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT careyjohnj irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax AT irelanddxafraxmaydiffersignificantlyandsubstantiallytowebfrax |