Cargando…
Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France
In face of evidence of rapid waning of vaccine effectiveness against Omicron and its sub-lineages, a second booster with mRNA vaccines was recommended for the most vulnerable in France. We used a test negative design to estimate the effectiveness of the second booster relative to the first booster a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.031 |
_version_ | 1784909828872732672 |
---|---|
author | Tamandjou, Cynthia Auvigne, Vincent Schaeffer, Justine Vaux, Sophie Parent du Châtelet, Isabelle |
author_facet | Tamandjou, Cynthia Auvigne, Vincent Schaeffer, Justine Vaux, Sophie Parent du Châtelet, Isabelle |
author_sort | Tamandjou, Cynthia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In face of evidence of rapid waning of vaccine effectiveness against Omicron and its sub-lineages, a second booster with mRNA vaccines was recommended for the most vulnerable in France. We used a test negative design to estimate the effectiveness of the second booster relative to the first booster and the protection conferred by a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 or BA.4/5. We included symptomatic ≥60 years old individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 in March 21-October 30, 2022. Compared to a 181–210 days old first booster, a second booster restored protection with a relative effectiveness of 41% [95%CI: 39–42%], 7–30 days post-vaccination. This gain in protection was lower than the one observed with the first booster, at equal time points since vaccination. High levels of protection were associated to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially when the infection was recent and occurred when an antigenic-related variant was dominant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10027956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100279562023-03-21 Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France Tamandjou, Cynthia Auvigne, Vincent Schaeffer, Justine Vaux, Sophie Parent du Châtelet, Isabelle Vaccine Short Communication In face of evidence of rapid waning of vaccine effectiveness against Omicron and its sub-lineages, a second booster with mRNA vaccines was recommended for the most vulnerable in France. We used a test negative design to estimate the effectiveness of the second booster relative to the first booster and the protection conferred by a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 or BA.4/5. We included symptomatic ≥60 years old individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 in March 21-October 30, 2022. Compared to a 181–210 days old first booster, a second booster restored protection with a relative effectiveness of 41% [95%CI: 39–42%], 7–30 days post-vaccination. This gain in protection was lower than the one observed with the first booster, at equal time points since vaccination. High levels of protection were associated to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially when the infection was recent and occurred when an antigenic-related variant was dominant. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-04-24 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10027956/ /pubmed/36964001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.031 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Tamandjou, Cynthia Auvigne, Vincent Schaeffer, Justine Vaux, Sophie Parent du Châtelet, Isabelle Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France |
title | Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France |
title_full | Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France |
title_short | Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France |
title_sort | effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous sars-cov-2 infection against symptomatic omicron ba.2 and ba.4/5 in france |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10027956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamandjoucynthia effectivenessofsecondboostercomparedtofirstboosterandprotectionconferredbyprevioussarscov2infectionagainstsymptomaticomicronba2andba45infrance AT auvignevincent effectivenessofsecondboostercomparedtofirstboosterandprotectionconferredbyprevioussarscov2infectionagainstsymptomaticomicronba2andba45infrance AT schaefferjustine effectivenessofsecondboostercomparedtofirstboosterandprotectionconferredbyprevioussarscov2infectionagainstsymptomaticomicronba2andba45infrance AT vauxsophie effectivenessofsecondboostercomparedtofirstboosterandprotectionconferredbyprevioussarscov2infectionagainstsymptomaticomicronba2andba45infrance AT parentduchateletisabelle effectivenessofsecondboostercomparedtofirstboosterandprotectionconferredbyprevioussarscov2infectionagainstsymptomaticomicronba2andba45infrance |