Cargando…
Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy
The Global South and Global North terminologies, in addition to several other designations, have been used to classify the socio-economic nature of countries for centuries; however, these historical naming conventions carry subtle confusions and tend to tint political discourse. This research explor...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028316/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01247-3 |
_version_ | 1784909923011788800 |
---|---|
author | Benuyenah, Vic |
author_facet | Benuyenah, Vic |
author_sort | Benuyenah, Vic |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Global South and Global North terminologies, in addition to several other designations, have been used to classify the socio-economic nature of countries for centuries; however, these historical naming conventions carry subtle confusions and tend to tint political discourse. This research explores the classificatory differences in international trade, politics, economic theory, and the media and discusses how such differences inform the narratives surrounding world production and consumption systems, as well as trade. The current evidence suggests that several descriptions of the world economies create misunderstandings and often mischaracterize less developed countries while positively projecting certain countries as more advanced. I argue that, rather than using the current descriptions, the terms “users” and “makers” be adopted to characterize the nature of production and consumption in modern economies. The new terminologies are less arbitrary as they can eliminate the existing semantic problems commonly found in the media and within economic theory and political discourse. The innovative and simpler user/maker dichotomy provides a less prejudiced designation of nations and provides a new research dimension for political economy and management theory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10028316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100283162023-03-21 Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy Benuyenah, Vic J Knowl Econ Article The Global South and Global North terminologies, in addition to several other designations, have been used to classify the socio-economic nature of countries for centuries; however, these historical naming conventions carry subtle confusions and tend to tint political discourse. This research explores the classificatory differences in international trade, politics, economic theory, and the media and discusses how such differences inform the narratives surrounding world production and consumption systems, as well as trade. The current evidence suggests that several descriptions of the world economies create misunderstandings and often mischaracterize less developed countries while positively projecting certain countries as more advanced. I argue that, rather than using the current descriptions, the terms “users” and “makers” be adopted to characterize the nature of production and consumption in modern economies. The new terminologies are less arbitrary as they can eliminate the existing semantic problems commonly found in the media and within economic theory and political discourse. The innovative and simpler user/maker dichotomy provides a less prejudiced designation of nations and provides a new research dimension for political economy and management theory. Springer US 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10028316/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01247-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Benuyenah, Vic Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy |
title | Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy |
title_full | Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy |
title_fullStr | Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy |
title_short | Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy |
title_sort | economies as 'makers' or 'users': rectifying the polysemic quandary with a dualist taxonomy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028316/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01247-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benuyenahvic economiesasmakersorusersrectifyingthepolysemicquandarywithadualisttaxonomy |