Cargando…
The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica
Grafting facilitates the interaction between heterologous cells with different genomes, resulting in abundant phenotypic variation, which provides opportunities for crop improvement. However, how grafting-induced variation occurs and is transmitted to progeny remains elusive. A graft chimera, especi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhad008 |
_version_ | 1784909940169637888 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ke Wang, Tingjin Xiao, Duohong Liu, Bin Yang, Yang Xu, Kexin Qi, Zhenyu Wang, Yan Li, Junxing Xiang, Xun Yuan, Lu Chen, Liping |
author_facet | Liu, Ke Wang, Tingjin Xiao, Duohong Liu, Bin Yang, Yang Xu, Kexin Qi, Zhenyu Wang, Yan Li, Junxing Xiang, Xun Yuan, Lu Chen, Liping |
author_sort | Liu, Ke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grafting facilitates the interaction between heterologous cells with different genomes, resulting in abundant phenotypic variation, which provides opportunities for crop improvement. However, how grafting-induced variation occurs and is transmitted to progeny remains elusive. A graft chimera, especially a periclinal chimera, which has genetically distinct cell layers throughout the plant, is an excellent model to probe the molecular mechanisms of grafting-induced variation maintenance. Here we regenerated a plant from the T-cell layer of a periclinal chimera, TCC (where the apical meristem was artificially divided into three cell layers – from outside to inside, L1, L2, and L3; T = Tuber mustard, C = red Cabbage), named rTTT0 (r = regenerated). Compared with the control (rsTTT, s = self-grafted), rTTT0 had multiple phenotypic variations, especially leaf shape variation, which could be maintained in sexual progeny. Transcriptomes were analyzed and 58 phenotypic variation-associated genes were identified. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing analyses revealed that the methylome of rTTT0 was changed, and the CG methylation level was significantly increased by 8.74%. In rTTT0, the coding gene bodies are hypermethylated in the CG context, while their promoter regions are hypomethylated in the non-CG context. DNA methylation changes in the leaf shape variation-associated coding genes, ARF10, IAA20, ROF1, and TPR2, were maintained for five generations of rTTT0. Interestingly, grafting chimerism also affected transcription of the microRNA gene (MIR), among which the DNA methylation levels of the promoters of three MIRs associated with leaf shape variation were changed in rTTT0, and the DNA methylation modification of MIR319 was maintained to the fifth generation of selfed progeny of rTTT0 (rTTT5). These findings demonstrate that DNA methylation of coding and non-coding genes plays an important role in heterologous cell interaction-induced variation formation and its transgenerational inheritance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10028404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100284042023-03-22 The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica Liu, Ke Wang, Tingjin Xiao, Duohong Liu, Bin Yang, Yang Xu, Kexin Qi, Zhenyu Wang, Yan Li, Junxing Xiang, Xun Yuan, Lu Chen, Liping Hortic Res Article Grafting facilitates the interaction between heterologous cells with different genomes, resulting in abundant phenotypic variation, which provides opportunities for crop improvement. However, how grafting-induced variation occurs and is transmitted to progeny remains elusive. A graft chimera, especially a periclinal chimera, which has genetically distinct cell layers throughout the plant, is an excellent model to probe the molecular mechanisms of grafting-induced variation maintenance. Here we regenerated a plant from the T-cell layer of a periclinal chimera, TCC (where the apical meristem was artificially divided into three cell layers – from outside to inside, L1, L2, and L3; T = Tuber mustard, C = red Cabbage), named rTTT0 (r = regenerated). Compared with the control (rsTTT, s = self-grafted), rTTT0 had multiple phenotypic variations, especially leaf shape variation, which could be maintained in sexual progeny. Transcriptomes were analyzed and 58 phenotypic variation-associated genes were identified. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing analyses revealed that the methylome of rTTT0 was changed, and the CG methylation level was significantly increased by 8.74%. In rTTT0, the coding gene bodies are hypermethylated in the CG context, while their promoter regions are hypomethylated in the non-CG context. DNA methylation changes in the leaf shape variation-associated coding genes, ARF10, IAA20, ROF1, and TPR2, were maintained for five generations of rTTT0. Interestingly, grafting chimerism also affected transcription of the microRNA gene (MIR), among which the DNA methylation levels of the promoters of three MIRs associated with leaf shape variation were changed in rTTT0, and the DNA methylation modification of MIR319 was maintained to the fifth generation of selfed progeny of rTTT0 (rTTT5). These findings demonstrate that DNA methylation of coding and non-coding genes plays an important role in heterologous cell interaction-induced variation formation and its transgenerational inheritance. Oxford University Press 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10028404/ /pubmed/36960429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhad008 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nanjing Agricultural University. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Ke Wang, Tingjin Xiao, Duohong Liu, Bin Yang, Yang Xu, Kexin Qi, Zhenyu Wang, Yan Li, Junxing Xiang, Xun Yuan, Lu Chen, Liping The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica |
title | The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica |
title_full | The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica |
title_fullStr | The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica |
title_short | The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica |
title_sort | role of dna methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in brassica |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhad008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuke theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT wangtingjin theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT xiaoduohong theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT liubin theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT yangyang theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT xukexin theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT qizhenyu theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT wangyan theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT lijunxing theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT xiangxun theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT yuanlu theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT chenliping theroleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT liuke roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT wangtingjin roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT xiaoduohong roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT liubin roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT yangyang roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT xukexin roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT qizhenyu roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT wangyan roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT lijunxing roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT xiangxun roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT yuanlu roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica AT chenliping roleofdnamethylationinthemaintenanceofphenotypicvariationinducedbygraftingchimerisminbrassica |