Cargando…

The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width

BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic grafts have gained attention due to advantages in compare of autografts. This study aimed to compare Xeno (ostrich) Acellular Dermal Matrix (XADM) with the free gingival graft (FGG) to increase the width of Keratinized gingiva (KGW) in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar, Inanlou, Mahdi, Khoshzaban, Ahad, Asghari, Ahmad, Akhondi, Nasrin, Sayar, Ferena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960022
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369618
_version_ 1784909975450025984
author Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar
Inanlou, Mahdi
Khoshzaban, Ahad
Asghari, Ahmad
Akhondi, Nasrin
Sayar, Ferena
author_facet Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar
Inanlou, Mahdi
Khoshzaban, Ahad
Asghari, Ahmad
Akhondi, Nasrin
Sayar, Ferena
author_sort Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic grafts have gained attention due to advantages in compare of autografts. This study aimed to compare Xeno (ostrich) Acellular Dermal Matrix (XADM) with the free gingival graft (FGG) to increase the width of Keratinized gingiva (KGW) in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split mouth animal study was performed on 10 mixed breed dogs. The upper second premolar sites were randomly selected for grafting by XADM (test) or FGG (control). Measurements of KGW were recorded before surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Biopsies from grafted sites for histologic and histomorphometric evaluations were harvested 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by repeated measured, paired samples t-test, and Wilcoxon Signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: KGW increased in the two study groups after surgery with no significant statistical difference between them at any time intervals (P > 0.05). The graft shrinkage was 23% and 21% for the test and control groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Histomorphometric evaluation showed no significant difference between the two study groups. Foreign body reaction was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSION: Increased KWG was similar between the two study groups. With regard to FGG limitations, XADM may be assumed as a suitable alternative for FGG. It should be noted that this research was an animal study and clinical trials on human should be performed to approve the efficacy and safety of this material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10028574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100285742023-03-22 The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar Inanlou, Mahdi Khoshzaban, Ahad Asghari, Ahmad Akhondi, Nasrin Sayar, Ferena Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic grafts have gained attention due to advantages in compare of autografts. This study aimed to compare Xeno (ostrich) Acellular Dermal Matrix (XADM) with the free gingival graft (FGG) to increase the width of Keratinized gingiva (KGW) in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split mouth animal study was performed on 10 mixed breed dogs. The upper second premolar sites were randomly selected for grafting by XADM (test) or FGG (control). Measurements of KGW were recorded before surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Biopsies from grafted sites for histologic and histomorphometric evaluations were harvested 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by repeated measured, paired samples t-test, and Wilcoxon Signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: KGW increased in the two study groups after surgery with no significant statistical difference between them at any time intervals (P > 0.05). The graft shrinkage was 23% and 21% for the test and control groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Histomorphometric evaluation showed no significant difference between the two study groups. Foreign body reaction was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSION: Increased KWG was similar between the two study groups. With regard to FGG limitations, XADM may be assumed as a suitable alternative for FGG. It should be noted that this research was an animal study and clinical trials on human should be performed to approve the efficacy and safety of this material. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10028574/ /pubmed/36960022 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369618 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar
Inanlou, Mahdi
Khoshzaban, Ahad
Asghari, Ahmad
Akhondi, Nasrin
Sayar, Ferena
The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
title The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
title_full The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
title_fullStr The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
title_full_unstemmed The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
title_short The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
title_sort effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960022
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369618
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadiroyashariatmadar theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT inanloumahdi theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT khoshzabanahad theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT asghariahmad theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT akhondinasrin theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT sayarferena theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT ahmadiroyashariatmadar effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT inanloumahdi effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT khoshzabanahad effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT asghariahmad effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT akhondinasrin effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth
AT sayarferena effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth