Cargando…
The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width
BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic grafts have gained attention due to advantages in compare of autografts. This study aimed to compare Xeno (ostrich) Acellular Dermal Matrix (XADM) with the free gingival graft (FGG) to increase the width of Keratinized gingiva (KGW) in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960022 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369618 |
_version_ | 1784909975450025984 |
---|---|
author | Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar Inanlou, Mahdi Khoshzaban, Ahad Asghari, Ahmad Akhondi, Nasrin Sayar, Ferena |
author_facet | Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar Inanlou, Mahdi Khoshzaban, Ahad Asghari, Ahmad Akhondi, Nasrin Sayar, Ferena |
author_sort | Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic grafts have gained attention due to advantages in compare of autografts. This study aimed to compare Xeno (ostrich) Acellular Dermal Matrix (XADM) with the free gingival graft (FGG) to increase the width of Keratinized gingiva (KGW) in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split mouth animal study was performed on 10 mixed breed dogs. The upper second premolar sites were randomly selected for grafting by XADM (test) or FGG (control). Measurements of KGW were recorded before surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Biopsies from grafted sites for histologic and histomorphometric evaluations were harvested 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by repeated measured, paired samples t-test, and Wilcoxon Signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: KGW increased in the two study groups after surgery with no significant statistical difference between them at any time intervals (P > 0.05). The graft shrinkage was 23% and 21% for the test and control groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Histomorphometric evaluation showed no significant difference between the two study groups. Foreign body reaction was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSION: Increased KWG was similar between the two study groups. With regard to FGG limitations, XADM may be assumed as a suitable alternative for FGG. It should be noted that this research was an animal study and clinical trials on human should be performed to approve the efficacy and safety of this material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10028574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100285742023-03-22 The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar Inanlou, Mahdi Khoshzaban, Ahad Asghari, Ahmad Akhondi, Nasrin Sayar, Ferena Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic grafts have gained attention due to advantages in compare of autografts. This study aimed to compare Xeno (ostrich) Acellular Dermal Matrix (XADM) with the free gingival graft (FGG) to increase the width of Keratinized gingiva (KGW) in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split mouth animal study was performed on 10 mixed breed dogs. The upper second premolar sites were randomly selected for grafting by XADM (test) or FGG (control). Measurements of KGW were recorded before surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Biopsies from grafted sites for histologic and histomorphometric evaluations were harvested 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by repeated measured, paired samples t-test, and Wilcoxon Signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: KGW increased in the two study groups after surgery with no significant statistical difference between them at any time intervals (P > 0.05). The graft shrinkage was 23% and 21% for the test and control groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Histomorphometric evaluation showed no significant difference between the two study groups. Foreign body reaction was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSION: Increased KWG was similar between the two study groups. With regard to FGG limitations, XADM may be assumed as a suitable alternative for FGG. It should be noted that this research was an animal study and clinical trials on human should be performed to approve the efficacy and safety of this material. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10028574/ /pubmed/36960022 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369618 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ahmadi, Roya Shariatmadar Inanlou, Mahdi Khoshzaban, Ahad Asghari, Ahmad Akhondi, Nasrin Sayar, Ferena The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
title | The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
title_full | The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
title_fullStr | The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
title_short | The effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
title_sort | effect of ostrich acellular dermal matrix on keratinized gingival width |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960022 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadiroyashariatmadar theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT inanloumahdi theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT khoshzabanahad theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT asghariahmad theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT akhondinasrin theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT sayarferena theeffectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT ahmadiroyashariatmadar effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT inanloumahdi effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT khoshzabanahad effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT asghariahmad effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT akhondinasrin effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth AT sayarferena effectofostrichacellulardermalmatrixonkeratinizedgingivalwidth |