Cargando…
Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods
BACKGROUND: During the orthodontic bonding process, the need for repositioning or rebonding of orthodontic brackets on the enamel surface occurs frequently. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) in rebonding orthodontic stainless steel brackets with three different method...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960018 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369627 |
_version_ | 1784909978494042112 |
---|---|
author | Safarzadeh, Saba Kachuie, Marzieh Birang, Reza Sadeghian, Saeid |
author_facet | Safarzadeh, Saba Kachuie, Marzieh Birang, Reza Sadeghian, Saeid |
author_sort | Safarzadeh, Saba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the orthodontic bonding process, the need for repositioning or rebonding of orthodontic brackets on the enamel surface occurs frequently. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) in rebonding orthodontic stainless steel brackets with three different methods of enamel surface conditioning methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 80 human premolars that were extracted for orthodontic purposes were randomly divided into four groups and underwent orthodontic bonding procedure (N = 20). Except for the control group, three other groups underwent debonding and rebonding process in which after removing the remaining adhesive with tungsten-carbide bur, enamel surface conditioned by three different methods including re-etching with phosphoric acid, sandblasting + acid etching, and Erbium-doped Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet laser. Then, the SBS of the bracket to the enamel surface was compared between different groups. Scanning Electron microscopy images were also obtained from a number of samples. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests. RESULTS: The highest SBS was observed in the primary bond (control group) with an average of 29,440 MPa. There was a significant difference between the studied groups (P < 0.001) and only the group that was re-etched with phosphoric acid had no significant difference with the control group (P = 0.708) ∝ =0.05. CONCLUSION: Rebonding of brackets using phosphoric acid for reconditioning of the enamel surface creates bond strength comparable to the primary bond. Other groups had significantly lower SBS than the control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10028586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100285862023-03-22 Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods Safarzadeh, Saba Kachuie, Marzieh Birang, Reza Sadeghian, Saeid Dent Res J (Isfahan) Review Article BACKGROUND: During the orthodontic bonding process, the need for repositioning or rebonding of orthodontic brackets on the enamel surface occurs frequently. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) in rebonding orthodontic stainless steel brackets with three different methods of enamel surface conditioning methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 80 human premolars that were extracted for orthodontic purposes were randomly divided into four groups and underwent orthodontic bonding procedure (N = 20). Except for the control group, three other groups underwent debonding and rebonding process in which after removing the remaining adhesive with tungsten-carbide bur, enamel surface conditioned by three different methods including re-etching with phosphoric acid, sandblasting + acid etching, and Erbium-doped Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet laser. Then, the SBS of the bracket to the enamel surface was compared between different groups. Scanning Electron microscopy images were also obtained from a number of samples. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests. RESULTS: The highest SBS was observed in the primary bond (control group) with an average of 29,440 MPa. There was a significant difference between the studied groups (P < 0.001) and only the group that was re-etched with phosphoric acid had no significant difference with the control group (P = 0.708) ∝ =0.05. CONCLUSION: Rebonding of brackets using phosphoric acid for reconditioning of the enamel surface creates bond strength comparable to the primary bond. Other groups had significantly lower SBS than the control group. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10028586/ /pubmed/36960018 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369627 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Safarzadeh, Saba Kachuie, Marzieh Birang, Reza Sadeghian, Saeid Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
title | Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
title_full | Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
title_short | Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960018 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safarzadehsaba comparisonofshearbondstrengthofrebondedstainlesssteelbracketswiththreedifferentenamelsurfaceconditioningmethods AT kachuiemarzieh comparisonofshearbondstrengthofrebondedstainlesssteelbracketswiththreedifferentenamelsurfaceconditioningmethods AT birangreza comparisonofshearbondstrengthofrebondedstainlesssteelbracketswiththreedifferentenamelsurfaceconditioningmethods AT sadeghiansaeid comparisonofshearbondstrengthofrebondedstainlesssteelbracketswiththreedifferentenamelsurfaceconditioningmethods |