Cargando…

The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The temporary cement remaining inside the dental prosthesis can act as a source of microbial colonization and contamination and decrease the final cement retention. Consequently, complete removal of temporary cement before permanent cementation is suggested. This study aimed to assess th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajoghli, Farshad, Fathi, Amirhossein, Ebadian, Behnaz, Jowkar, Mohammad, Sabouhi, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960017
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369624
_version_ 1784909978738360320
author Bajoghli, Farshad
Fathi, Amirhossein
Ebadian, Behnaz
Jowkar, Mohammad
Sabouhi, Mahmoud
author_facet Bajoghli, Farshad
Fathi, Amirhossein
Ebadian, Behnaz
Jowkar, Mohammad
Sabouhi, Mahmoud
author_sort Bajoghli, Farshad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The temporary cement remaining inside the dental prosthesis can act as a source of microbial colonization and contamination and decrease the final cement retention. Consequently, complete removal of temporary cement before permanent cementation is suggested. This study aimed to assess the effect of different cleaning methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force (TBF) of permanently cemented implant-supported zirconia copings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study fifty titanium abutments were screwed onto 50 analogs with 30 Ncm torque into in acrylic resin blocks. Each abutment was scanned separately, and 50 zirconia copings were designed and milled. Permanent resin cement was used to cement copings of control group (N = 10). Copings were divided into two temporary cementation types that in each group, two cleansing methods were used: Temp-S (temporary cement with eugenol and sandblasted after debonding), Samples of the control group were placed in the universal testing machine, and the TBF values were recorded. Samples of the test groups after debonding and cleaning the abutments were subjected to cement with permanent resin cement, aging, and removing. Levene test, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tamhane post hoc tests were applied. α = 0.05. RESULTS: The highest and lowest TBF values were found for the TempNE-SU (554.7 ± 31.5 N) and Temp-S (492.2 ± 48 N) groups, respectively. The two groups of isopropyl alcohol baths in ultrasonics in combination with sandblasting showed statistically higher TBF values than the other two groups that used only sandblasting (P < 0.001) and had similar values compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Sandblasting combined with immersion in an ultrasonic bath containing isopropyl alcohol resulted in statistically similar values to the values of cementation with resin cement from the beginning. However, cleaning the inside of the copings only by sandblasting method reduced the values of the final retention force in comparison to cement with permanent resin cement from the beginning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10028587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100285872023-03-22 The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study Bajoghli, Farshad Fathi, Amirhossein Ebadian, Behnaz Jowkar, Mohammad Sabouhi, Mahmoud Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The temporary cement remaining inside the dental prosthesis can act as a source of microbial colonization and contamination and decrease the final cement retention. Consequently, complete removal of temporary cement before permanent cementation is suggested. This study aimed to assess the effect of different cleaning methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force (TBF) of permanently cemented implant-supported zirconia copings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study fifty titanium abutments were screwed onto 50 analogs with 30 Ncm torque into in acrylic resin blocks. Each abutment was scanned separately, and 50 zirconia copings were designed and milled. Permanent resin cement was used to cement copings of control group (N = 10). Copings were divided into two temporary cementation types that in each group, two cleansing methods were used: Temp-S (temporary cement with eugenol and sandblasted after debonding), Samples of the control group were placed in the universal testing machine, and the TBF values were recorded. Samples of the test groups after debonding and cleaning the abutments were subjected to cement with permanent resin cement, aging, and removing. Levene test, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tamhane post hoc tests were applied. α = 0.05. RESULTS: The highest and lowest TBF values were found for the TempNE-SU (554.7 ± 31.5 N) and Temp-S (492.2 ± 48 N) groups, respectively. The two groups of isopropyl alcohol baths in ultrasonics in combination with sandblasting showed statistically higher TBF values than the other two groups that used only sandblasting (P < 0.001) and had similar values compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Sandblasting combined with immersion in an ultrasonic bath containing isopropyl alcohol resulted in statistically similar values to the values of cementation with resin cement from the beginning. However, cleaning the inside of the copings only by sandblasting method reduced the values of the final retention force in comparison to cement with permanent resin cement from the beginning. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10028587/ /pubmed/36960017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369624 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bajoghli, Farshad
Fathi, Amirhossein
Ebadian, Behnaz
Jowkar, Mohammad
Sabouhi, Mahmoud
The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study
title The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study
title_full The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study
title_fullStr The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study
title_short The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study
title_sort effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960017
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369624
work_keys_str_mv AT bajoghlifarshad theeffectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT fathiamirhossein theeffectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT ebadianbehnaz theeffectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT jowkarmohammad theeffectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT sabouhimahmoud theeffectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT bajoghlifarshad effectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT fathiamirhossein effectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT ebadianbehnaz effectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT jowkarmohammad effectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy
AT sabouhimahmoud effectofdifferentmethodsofcleansingtemporarycementwithandwithouteugenolonthefinalbondstrengthofimplantsupportedzirconiacopingsafterfinalcementationaninvitrostudy