Cargando…
Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221121391 |
_version_ | 1784909994097901568 |
---|---|
author | Magarinos, Jessica Lutzow, Lynde Dass, Chandra Ma, Grace X. Erkmen, Cherie P. |
author_facet | Magarinos, Jessica Lutzow, Lynde Dass, Chandra Ma, Grace X. Erkmen, Cherie P. |
author_sort | Magarinos, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung–RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person. CONCLUSION: We implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10028660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100286602023-03-22 Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population Magarinos, Jessica Lutzow, Lynde Dass, Chandra Ma, Grace X. Erkmen, Cherie P. Cancer Control Original Research Article BACKGROUND: COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung–RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person. CONCLUSION: We implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. SAGE Publications 2023-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10028660/ /pubmed/36935556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221121391 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Magarinos, Jessica Lutzow, Lynde Dass, Chandra Ma, Grace X. Erkmen, Cherie P. Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population |
title | Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening:
A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population |
title_full | Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening:
A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening:
A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening:
A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population |
title_short | Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening:
A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population |
title_sort | feasibility of single - encounter telemedicine lung cancer screening:
a retrospective cohort study in an underserved population |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221121391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magarinosjessica feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation AT lutzowlynde feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation AT dasschandra feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation AT magracex feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation AT erkmencheriep feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation |