Cargando…

Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magarinos, Jessica, Lutzow, Lynde, Dass, Chandra, Ma, Grace X., Erkmen, Cherie P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221121391
_version_ 1784909994097901568
author Magarinos, Jessica
Lutzow, Lynde
Dass, Chandra
Ma, Grace X.
Erkmen, Cherie P.
author_facet Magarinos, Jessica
Lutzow, Lynde
Dass, Chandra
Ma, Grace X.
Erkmen, Cherie P.
author_sort Magarinos, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung–RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person. CONCLUSION: We implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10028660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100286602023-03-22 Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population Magarinos, Jessica Lutzow, Lynde Dass, Chandra Ma, Grace X. Erkmen, Cherie P. Cancer Control Original Research Article BACKGROUND: COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung–RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person. CONCLUSION: We implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19. SAGE Publications 2023-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10028660/ /pubmed/36935556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221121391 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Magarinos, Jessica
Lutzow, Lynde
Dass, Chandra
Ma, Grace X.
Erkmen, Cherie P.
Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
title Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
title_full Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
title_fullStr Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
title_short Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population
title_sort feasibility of single - encounter telemedicine lung cancer screening: a retrospective cohort study in an underserved population
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221121391
work_keys_str_mv AT magarinosjessica feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation
AT lutzowlynde feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation
AT dasschandra feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation
AT magracex feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation
AT erkmencheriep feasibilityofsingleencountertelemedicinelungcancerscreeningaretrospectivecohortstudyinanunderservedpopulation