Cargando…

Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services

As the international division of labour becomes more entrenched, the distance goods travel before they reach the final consumer increases; at least this was the case before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. International trade and cross-border cargo movements generate significant carbon emissio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Pei-Chun, Bai, Her-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028761/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00259-9
_version_ 1784910015102976000
author Lin, Pei-Chun
Bai, Her-Jen
author_facet Lin, Pei-Chun
Bai, Her-Jen
author_sort Lin, Pei-Chun
collection PubMed
description As the international division of labour becomes more entrenched, the distance goods travel before they reach the final consumer increases; at least this was the case before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. International trade and cross-border cargo movements generate significant carbon emissions. Despite theoretical advances, empirical studies frequently draw contradictory conclusions and the influence of international trade on a country’s decarbonization efforts is inconclusive. This study examines the carbon emissions caused by countries’ transportation services on global value chains. The input–output (IO) model and the 2015 multi-regional environmental input–output table from the UNCTAD-Eora database are employed. The input–output approach was used to determine the carbon emissions generated by the transport sector, along global value chains, in 190 countries. Environmentally extended IO analysis then reallocates emissions responsibilities of the transport sector from production to consumption. The study identifies which country’s transport sectors add more value or emit more CO2. Our findings indicated that: (1) the transportation industry of a country may have a detrimental effect on the environment while generating minimal economic benefit; and (2) a country’s transport industry may be tightly related to global value chain operations, but does not create considerable environmental impact. Given the significant differences in emissions intensity, we propose not only calculating the production-based accounting (PBA) of CO(2) emissions, but also the consumption-based accounting (CBA). If CBA emissions are lower than PBA emissions, a country’s transport sector is in carbon-leakage credit. The top three countries with the highest carbon-leakage credit for the transport sector were China, Russia and USA. If carbon emissions are taken into consideration, some nations may cease to possess a comparative advantage in manufacturing and trade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10028761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100287612023-03-21 Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services Lin, Pei-Chun Bai, Her-Jen Marit Econ Logist Original Article As the international division of labour becomes more entrenched, the distance goods travel before they reach the final consumer increases; at least this was the case before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. International trade and cross-border cargo movements generate significant carbon emissions. Despite theoretical advances, empirical studies frequently draw contradictory conclusions and the influence of international trade on a country’s decarbonization efforts is inconclusive. This study examines the carbon emissions caused by countries’ transportation services on global value chains. The input–output (IO) model and the 2015 multi-regional environmental input–output table from the UNCTAD-Eora database are employed. The input–output approach was used to determine the carbon emissions generated by the transport sector, along global value chains, in 190 countries. Environmentally extended IO analysis then reallocates emissions responsibilities of the transport sector from production to consumption. The study identifies which country’s transport sectors add more value or emit more CO2. Our findings indicated that: (1) the transportation industry of a country may have a detrimental effect on the environment while generating minimal economic benefit; and (2) a country’s transport industry may be tightly related to global value chain operations, but does not create considerable environmental impact. Given the significant differences in emissions intensity, we propose not only calculating the production-based accounting (PBA) of CO(2) emissions, but also the consumption-based accounting (CBA). If CBA emissions are lower than PBA emissions, a country’s transport sector is in carbon-leakage credit. The top three countries with the highest carbon-leakage credit for the transport sector were China, Russia and USA. If carbon emissions are taken into consideration, some nations may cease to possess a comparative advantage in manufacturing and trade. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10028761/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00259-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lin, Pei-Chun
Bai, Her-Jen
Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services
title Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services
title_full Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services
title_fullStr Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services
title_full_unstemmed Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services
title_short Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO(2) accounting of transportation services
title_sort emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based co(2) accounting of transportation services
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028761/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00259-9
work_keys_str_mv AT linpeichun emissionsintensitycomparisonsandconsumptionbasedco2accountingoftransportationservices
AT baiherjen emissionsintensitycomparisonsandconsumptionbasedco2accountingoftransportationservices