Cargando…
Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
INTRODUCTION: Accurate, patient-centered evaluation of physical function in patients with cancer can provide important information on the functional impacts experienced by patients both from the disease and its treatment. Increasingly, digital health technology is facilitating and providing new ways...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286924 |
_version_ | 1784910067731005440 |
---|---|
author | Thanarajasingam, Gita Kluetz, Paul G. Bhatnagar, Vishal Brown, Abbie Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth Diamond, Matthew Faust, Louis Fiero, Mallorie H. Huntington, Scott F. Jeffery, Molly Moore Jones, Lee Noble, Brie N. Paludo, Jonas Powers, Brad Ross, Joseph S. Ritchie, Jessica D. Ruddy, Kathryn J. Schellhorn, Sarah E. Tarver, Michelle E. Dueck, Amylou C. Gross, Cary P. |
author_facet | Thanarajasingam, Gita Kluetz, Paul G. Bhatnagar, Vishal Brown, Abbie Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth Diamond, Matthew Faust, Louis Fiero, Mallorie H. Huntington, Scott F. Jeffery, Molly Moore Jones, Lee Noble, Brie N. Paludo, Jonas Powers, Brad Ross, Joseph S. Ritchie, Jessica D. Ruddy, Kathryn J. Schellhorn, Sarah E. Tarver, Michelle E. Dueck, Amylou C. Gross, Cary P. |
author_sort | Thanarajasingam, Gita |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Accurate, patient-centered evaluation of physical function in patients with cancer can provide important information on the functional impacts experienced by patients both from the disease and its treatment. Increasingly, digital health technology is facilitating and providing new ways to measure symptoms and function. There is a need to characterize the longitudinal measurement characteristics of physical function assessments, including clinician-reported physical function (ClinRo), patient-reported physical function (PRO), performance outcome tests (PerfO) and wearable data, to inform regulatory and clinical decision-making in cancer clinical trials and oncology practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this prospective study, we are enrolling 200 English- and/or Spanish-speaking patients with breast cancer or lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic or Yale University who will receive standard of care intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy. Physical function assessments will be obtained longitudinally using multiple assessment modalities. Participants will be followed for 9 months using a patient-centered health data aggregating platform that consolidates study questionnaires, electronic health record data, and activity and sleep data from a wearable sensor. Data analysis will focus on understanding variability, sensitivity, and meaningful changes across the included physical function assessments and evaluating their relationship to key clinical outcomes. Additionally, the feasibility of multi-modal physical function data collection in real-world patients with cancer will be assessed, as will patient impressions of the usability and acceptability of the wearable sensor, data aggregation platform, and PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from IRBs at Mayo Clinic, Yale University, and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results will be made available to participants, funders, the research community, and the public. REGISTRATION DETAILS. The trial registration number for this study is NCT05214144 STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study addresses an important unmet need by characterizing the performance characteristics of multiple patient-centered physical function measures in patients with cancer. Physical function is an important and undermeasured clinical outcome. Scientifically rigorous capture and measurement of physical function constitutes a key component of cancer treatment tolerability assessment both from a regulatory and clinical perspective. This study will include patients with lymphoma or breast cancer receiving a broad range of cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. While recruitment will occur at two academic sites, patients who ultimately receive treatment at local community sites will be included. A patient-centered health data aggregating platform facilitates the delivery of patient-reported outcome measures and collection of wearable data to researchers, while reducing patient burden compared to traditional patient-generated data collection and aggregation methods. Heterogeneity in patient willingness or comfort engaging with mobile products including smartphones and wearables, enrollment primarily at large academic centers, and the modest sample size are potential limitations to the external validity of the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10029056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100290562023-03-22 Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study Thanarajasingam, Gita Kluetz, Paul G. Bhatnagar, Vishal Brown, Abbie Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth Diamond, Matthew Faust, Louis Fiero, Mallorie H. Huntington, Scott F. Jeffery, Molly Moore Jones, Lee Noble, Brie N. Paludo, Jonas Powers, Brad Ross, Joseph S. Ritchie, Jessica D. Ruddy, Kathryn J. Schellhorn, Sarah E. Tarver, Michelle E. Dueck, Amylou C. Gross, Cary P. medRxiv Article INTRODUCTION: Accurate, patient-centered evaluation of physical function in patients with cancer can provide important information on the functional impacts experienced by patients both from the disease and its treatment. Increasingly, digital health technology is facilitating and providing new ways to measure symptoms and function. There is a need to characterize the longitudinal measurement characteristics of physical function assessments, including clinician-reported physical function (ClinRo), patient-reported physical function (PRO), performance outcome tests (PerfO) and wearable data, to inform regulatory and clinical decision-making in cancer clinical trials and oncology practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this prospective study, we are enrolling 200 English- and/or Spanish-speaking patients with breast cancer or lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic or Yale University who will receive standard of care intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy. Physical function assessments will be obtained longitudinally using multiple assessment modalities. Participants will be followed for 9 months using a patient-centered health data aggregating platform that consolidates study questionnaires, electronic health record data, and activity and sleep data from a wearable sensor. Data analysis will focus on understanding variability, sensitivity, and meaningful changes across the included physical function assessments and evaluating their relationship to key clinical outcomes. Additionally, the feasibility of multi-modal physical function data collection in real-world patients with cancer will be assessed, as will patient impressions of the usability and acceptability of the wearable sensor, data aggregation platform, and PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from IRBs at Mayo Clinic, Yale University, and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results will be made available to participants, funders, the research community, and the public. REGISTRATION DETAILS. The trial registration number for this study is NCT05214144 STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study addresses an important unmet need by characterizing the performance characteristics of multiple patient-centered physical function measures in patients with cancer. Physical function is an important and undermeasured clinical outcome. Scientifically rigorous capture and measurement of physical function constitutes a key component of cancer treatment tolerability assessment both from a regulatory and clinical perspective. This study will include patients with lymphoma or breast cancer receiving a broad range of cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. While recruitment will occur at two academic sites, patients who ultimately receive treatment at local community sites will be included. A patient-centered health data aggregating platform facilitates the delivery of patient-reported outcome measures and collection of wearable data to researchers, while reducing patient burden compared to traditional patient-generated data collection and aggregation methods. Heterogeneity in patient willingness or comfort engaging with mobile products including smartphones and wearables, enrollment primarily at large academic centers, and the modest sample size are potential limitations to the external validity of the study. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10029056/ /pubmed/36945495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286924 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Thanarajasingam, Gita Kluetz, Paul G. Bhatnagar, Vishal Brown, Abbie Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth Diamond, Matthew Faust, Louis Fiero, Mallorie H. Huntington, Scott F. Jeffery, Molly Moore Jones, Lee Noble, Brie N. Paludo, Jonas Powers, Brad Ross, Joseph S. Ritchie, Jessica D. Ruddy, Kathryn J. Schellhorn, Sarah E. Tarver, Michelle E. Dueck, Amylou C. Gross, Cary P. Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study |
title | Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study |
title_full | Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study |
title_fullStr | Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study |
title_short | Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study |
title_sort | integrating 4 measures to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (in4m): protocol for a prospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thanarajasingamgita integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT kluetzpaulg integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT bhatnagarvishal integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT brownabbie integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT cathcartrakeelizabeth integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT diamondmatthew integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT faustlouis integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT fieromallorieh integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT huntingtonscottf integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT jefferymollymoore integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT joneslee integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT noblebrien integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT paludojonas integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT powersbrad integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT rossjosephs integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT ritchiejessicad integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT ruddykathrynj integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT schellhornsarahe integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT tarvermichellee integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT dueckamylouc integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy AT grosscaryp integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy |