Cargando…

Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study

INTRODUCTION: Accurate, patient-centered evaluation of physical function in patients with cancer can provide important information on the functional impacts experienced by patients both from the disease and its treatment. Increasingly, digital health technology is facilitating and providing new ways...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thanarajasingam, Gita, Kluetz, Paul G., Bhatnagar, Vishal, Brown, Abbie, Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth, Diamond, Matthew, Faust, Louis, Fiero, Mallorie H., Huntington, Scott F., Jeffery, Molly Moore, Jones, Lee, Noble, Brie N., Paludo, Jonas, Powers, Brad, Ross, Joseph S., Ritchie, Jessica D., Ruddy, Kathryn J., Schellhorn, Sarah E., Tarver, Michelle E., Dueck, Amylou C., Gross, Cary P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286924
_version_ 1784910067731005440
author Thanarajasingam, Gita
Kluetz, Paul G.
Bhatnagar, Vishal
Brown, Abbie
Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth
Diamond, Matthew
Faust, Louis
Fiero, Mallorie H.
Huntington, Scott F.
Jeffery, Molly Moore
Jones, Lee
Noble, Brie N.
Paludo, Jonas
Powers, Brad
Ross, Joseph S.
Ritchie, Jessica D.
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Schellhorn, Sarah E.
Tarver, Michelle E.
Dueck, Amylou C.
Gross, Cary P.
author_facet Thanarajasingam, Gita
Kluetz, Paul G.
Bhatnagar, Vishal
Brown, Abbie
Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth
Diamond, Matthew
Faust, Louis
Fiero, Mallorie H.
Huntington, Scott F.
Jeffery, Molly Moore
Jones, Lee
Noble, Brie N.
Paludo, Jonas
Powers, Brad
Ross, Joseph S.
Ritchie, Jessica D.
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Schellhorn, Sarah E.
Tarver, Michelle E.
Dueck, Amylou C.
Gross, Cary P.
author_sort Thanarajasingam, Gita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate, patient-centered evaluation of physical function in patients with cancer can provide important information on the functional impacts experienced by patients both from the disease and its treatment. Increasingly, digital health technology is facilitating and providing new ways to measure symptoms and function. There is a need to characterize the longitudinal measurement characteristics of physical function assessments, including clinician-reported physical function (ClinRo), patient-reported physical function (PRO), performance outcome tests (PerfO) and wearable data, to inform regulatory and clinical decision-making in cancer clinical trials and oncology practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this prospective study, we are enrolling 200 English- and/or Spanish-speaking patients with breast cancer or lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic or Yale University who will receive standard of care intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy. Physical function assessments will be obtained longitudinally using multiple assessment modalities. Participants will be followed for 9 months using a patient-centered health data aggregating platform that consolidates study questionnaires, electronic health record data, and activity and sleep data from a wearable sensor. Data analysis will focus on understanding variability, sensitivity, and meaningful changes across the included physical function assessments and evaluating their relationship to key clinical outcomes. Additionally, the feasibility of multi-modal physical function data collection in real-world patients with cancer will be assessed, as will patient impressions of the usability and acceptability of the wearable sensor, data aggregation platform, and PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from IRBs at Mayo Clinic, Yale University, and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results will be made available to participants, funders, the research community, and the public. REGISTRATION DETAILS. The trial registration number for this study is NCT05214144 STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study addresses an important unmet need by characterizing the performance characteristics of multiple patient-centered physical function measures in patients with cancer. Physical function is an important and undermeasured clinical outcome. Scientifically rigorous capture and measurement of physical function constitutes a key component of cancer treatment tolerability assessment both from a regulatory and clinical perspective. This study will include patients with lymphoma or breast cancer receiving a broad range of cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. While recruitment will occur at two academic sites, patients who ultimately receive treatment at local community sites will be included. A patient-centered health data aggregating platform facilitates the delivery of patient-reported outcome measures and collection of wearable data to researchers, while reducing patient burden compared to traditional patient-generated data collection and aggregation methods. Heterogeneity in patient willingness or comfort engaging with mobile products including smartphones and wearables, enrollment primarily at large academic centers, and the modest sample size are potential limitations to the external validity of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10029056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100290562023-03-22 Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study Thanarajasingam, Gita Kluetz, Paul G. Bhatnagar, Vishal Brown, Abbie Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth Diamond, Matthew Faust, Louis Fiero, Mallorie H. Huntington, Scott F. Jeffery, Molly Moore Jones, Lee Noble, Brie N. Paludo, Jonas Powers, Brad Ross, Joseph S. Ritchie, Jessica D. Ruddy, Kathryn J. Schellhorn, Sarah E. Tarver, Michelle E. Dueck, Amylou C. Gross, Cary P. medRxiv Article INTRODUCTION: Accurate, patient-centered evaluation of physical function in patients with cancer can provide important information on the functional impacts experienced by patients both from the disease and its treatment. Increasingly, digital health technology is facilitating and providing new ways to measure symptoms and function. There is a need to characterize the longitudinal measurement characteristics of physical function assessments, including clinician-reported physical function (ClinRo), patient-reported physical function (PRO), performance outcome tests (PerfO) and wearable data, to inform regulatory and clinical decision-making in cancer clinical trials and oncology practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this prospective study, we are enrolling 200 English- and/or Spanish-speaking patients with breast cancer or lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic or Yale University who will receive standard of care intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy. Physical function assessments will be obtained longitudinally using multiple assessment modalities. Participants will be followed for 9 months using a patient-centered health data aggregating platform that consolidates study questionnaires, electronic health record data, and activity and sleep data from a wearable sensor. Data analysis will focus on understanding variability, sensitivity, and meaningful changes across the included physical function assessments and evaluating their relationship to key clinical outcomes. Additionally, the feasibility of multi-modal physical function data collection in real-world patients with cancer will be assessed, as will patient impressions of the usability and acceptability of the wearable sensor, data aggregation platform, and PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from IRBs at Mayo Clinic, Yale University, and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results will be made available to participants, funders, the research community, and the public. REGISTRATION DETAILS. The trial registration number for this study is NCT05214144 STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study addresses an important unmet need by characterizing the performance characteristics of multiple patient-centered physical function measures in patients with cancer. Physical function is an important and undermeasured clinical outcome. Scientifically rigorous capture and measurement of physical function constitutes a key component of cancer treatment tolerability assessment both from a regulatory and clinical perspective. This study will include patients with lymphoma or breast cancer receiving a broad range of cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. While recruitment will occur at two academic sites, patients who ultimately receive treatment at local community sites will be included. A patient-centered health data aggregating platform facilitates the delivery of patient-reported outcome measures and collection of wearable data to researchers, while reducing patient burden compared to traditional patient-generated data collection and aggregation methods. Heterogeneity in patient willingness or comfort engaging with mobile products including smartphones and wearables, enrollment primarily at large academic centers, and the modest sample size are potential limitations to the external validity of the study. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10029056/ /pubmed/36945495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286924 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Thanarajasingam, Gita
Kluetz, Paul G.
Bhatnagar, Vishal
Brown, Abbie
Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth
Diamond, Matthew
Faust, Louis
Fiero, Mallorie H.
Huntington, Scott F.
Jeffery, Molly Moore
Jones, Lee
Noble, Brie N.
Paludo, Jonas
Powers, Brad
Ross, Joseph S.
Ritchie, Jessica D.
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Schellhorn, Sarah E.
Tarver, Michelle E.
Dueck, Amylou C.
Gross, Cary P.
Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
title Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
title_full Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
title_fullStr Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
title_short Integrating 4 Measures to Evaluate Physical Function in Patients with Cancer (In4M): Protocol for a prospective study
title_sort integrating 4 measures to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (in4m): protocol for a prospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.08.23286924
work_keys_str_mv AT thanarajasingamgita integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT kluetzpaulg integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT bhatnagarvishal integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT brownabbie integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT cathcartrakeelizabeth integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT diamondmatthew integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT faustlouis integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT fieromallorieh integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT huntingtonscottf integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT jefferymollymoore integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT joneslee integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT noblebrien integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT paludojonas integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT powersbrad integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT rossjosephs integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT ritchiejessicad integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT ruddykathrynj integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT schellhornsarahe integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT tarvermichellee integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT dueckamylouc integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy
AT grosscaryp integrating4measurestoevaluatephysicalfunctioninpatientswithcancerin4mprotocolforaprospectivestudy