Cargando…

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are widely used in the comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the advantages of MIE for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Published clinical studies were reviewed and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Zixian, Zhu, Kanghao, Sun, Jiajing, Zhang, Jian, Zhang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02180-x
_version_ 1784910103958257664
author Jin, Zixian
Zhu, Kanghao
Sun, Jiajing
Zhang, Jian
Zhang, Bo
author_facet Jin, Zixian
Zhu, Kanghao
Sun, Jiajing
Zhang, Jian
Zhang, Bo
author_sort Jin, Zixian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are widely used in the comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the advantages of MIE for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Published clinical studies were reviewed and survival data and safety data were extracted. We compared the long-term survival and safety of MIE versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant surgery in a series of meta-analyses. RESULTS: 6 retrospective studies were included. Overall, MIE could significantly improve the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy compared with open esophagectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.75, 0.98)]. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE could significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and operative time [mean difference (MD) = −40.28.78, 95% CI (− 62.98, − 17.58); MD = −28.78, 95% CI (− 42.48, − 15.07), respectively]. There was no significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality between MIE and open esophagectomy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.42, 95% CI (0.09, 2.01); OR 0.80, 95% CI (0.25, 2.60), respectively]. MIE could not significantly reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and chylothorax [OR 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.32); OR 1.43, 95% CI (0.33, 6.25); HR = 1.79, 95% CI (0.67, 4.75), respectively], but the incidence of pneumonia was significantly reduced [HR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.22, 0.82)]. In addition, the length of hospital stay and the incidence of total complications were significantly reduced after MIE [MD = −2.61, 95% CI (− 3.10, − 2.12); HR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.45, 0.98), respectively]. CONCLUSION: MIE after neoadjuvant therapy is effective and safe. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE can improve the long-term survival and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-023-02180-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10029261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100292612023-03-22 Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis Jin, Zixian Zhu, Kanghao Sun, Jiajing Zhang, Jian Zhang, Bo J Cardiothorac Surg Research OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are widely used in the comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the advantages of MIE for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Published clinical studies were reviewed and survival data and safety data were extracted. We compared the long-term survival and safety of MIE versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant surgery in a series of meta-analyses. RESULTS: 6 retrospective studies were included. Overall, MIE could significantly improve the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy compared with open esophagectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.75, 0.98)]. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE could significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and operative time [mean difference (MD) = −40.28.78, 95% CI (− 62.98, − 17.58); MD = −28.78, 95% CI (− 42.48, − 15.07), respectively]. There was no significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality between MIE and open esophagectomy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.42, 95% CI (0.09, 2.01); OR 0.80, 95% CI (0.25, 2.60), respectively]. MIE could not significantly reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and chylothorax [OR 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.32); OR 1.43, 95% CI (0.33, 6.25); HR = 1.79, 95% CI (0.67, 4.75), respectively], but the incidence of pneumonia was significantly reduced [HR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.22, 0.82)]. In addition, the length of hospital stay and the incidence of total complications were significantly reduced after MIE [MD = −2.61, 95% CI (− 3.10, − 2.12); HR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.45, 0.98), respectively]. CONCLUSION: MIE after neoadjuvant therapy is effective and safe. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE can improve the long-term survival and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-023-02180-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10029261/ /pubmed/36945008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02180-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jin, Zixian
Zhu, Kanghao
Sun, Jiajing
Zhang, Jian
Zhang, Bo
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
title Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02180-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jinzixian minimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyafterneoadjuvanttherapyforesophagealcancerametaanalysis
AT zhukanghao minimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyafterneoadjuvanttherapyforesophagealcancerametaanalysis
AT sunjiajing minimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyafterneoadjuvanttherapyforesophagealcancerametaanalysis
AT zhangjian minimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyafterneoadjuvanttherapyforesophagealcancerametaanalysis
AT zhangbo minimallyinvasiveversusopenesophagectomyafterneoadjuvanttherapyforesophagealcancerametaanalysis