Cargando…

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease in South Africa - limitations of studies comparing prevalence with sub-Saharan Africa, Africa, and globally

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a globally significant non-communicable disorder. CKD prevalence varies between countries and within a country. We compared the prevalence rates of CKD in South Africa with sub-Saharan Africa, Africa, and globally. METHODS: We registered a systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hariparshad, Sudesh, Bhimma, Rajendra, Nandlal, Louansha, Jembere, Edgar, Naicker, Saraladevi, Assounga, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03109-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a globally significant non-communicable disorder. CKD prevalence varies between countries and within a country. We compared the prevalence rates of CKD in South Africa with sub-Saharan Africa, Africa, and globally. METHODS: We registered a systematic review with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews for prevalence studies reporting CKD stages III-V from 2013 to 2021. The analysis sought to explain any significant differences in prevalence rates. The R statistical package was used for data analysis. Comparisons included measures of effect size due to the large sample sizes analysed. We also compared sex differences in prevalence rates, common aetiologies, and type of study methodologies employed. RESULTS: Eight studies were analysed, with two from each region. The matched prevalence rates of CKD between the various regions and South Africa showed significant differences, except for one comparison between South Africa and an African study [p = 0.09 (95% CI − 0.04–0.01)]. Both sub-Saharan African studies had a higher prevalence than South Africa. One study in Africa had a higher prevalence, while the other had a lower prevalence, whilst one Global study had a higher prevalence, and the other had a lower prevalence compared to South Africa. The statistical differences analysed using the Cramer’s V test were substantially less than 0.1. Thus, differences in comparisons were largely due to differences in sample sizes rather than actual differences. CONCLUSION: Variable prevalence rates between regions included disparities in sample size, definitions of CKD, lack of chronicity testing and heterogeneous laboratory estimations of eGFR. Improved consistency and enhanced methods for diagnosing and comparing CKD prevalence are essential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-023-03109-1.