Cargando…

Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in corneal stiffness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Age, gender, spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness (CCT)–matched cases u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemi, Hassan, Roberts, Cynthia J., Elsheikh, Ahmed, Mehravaran, Shiva, Panahi, Parsa, Asgari, Soheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.12
_version_ 1784910208873529344
author Hashemi, Hassan
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Mehravaran, Shiva
Panahi, Parsa
Asgari, Soheila
author_facet Hashemi, Hassan
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Mehravaran, Shiva
Panahi, Parsa
Asgari, Soheila
author_sort Hashemi, Hassan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in corneal stiffness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Age, gender, spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness (CCT)–matched cases undergoing SMILE with a 120-µ cap, FS-LASIK with a 110-µ flap, and PRK were enrolled. One-year change in the stress–strain index, stiffness parameter at first applanation, integrated inverse radius, deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm, and deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm were compared between the surgical groups by linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Within each surgical group, 120 eyes completed 1 year of follow-up. The residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness and (RSB/CCT(postop)) were 348.1 ± 35.0 (0.74), 375.4 ± 31.0 (0.77) and 426.7 ± 2 µm (0.88) after SMILE, FS-LASIK, and PRK, respectively. The 1-year change in all biomechanical indices was significant, except the stress–strain index with PRK (P = 0.884). The change in all indices with SMILE were significantly greater than with FS-LASIK and with PRK (all P < 0.01), except the deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm change between SMILE and FS-LASIK (P = 0.075). The changes in all indices with FS-LASIK were significantly greater than with PRK (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although SMILE preserves the greatest amount of anterior cornea with a cap thickness of 120 µ, this also produces the smallest RSB and the greatest decrease in stiffness. Thus, the RSB is shown to be the predominant determinant of stiffness decreases, rather than the preserved anterior cornea. We recommend using a thinner cap to achieve a thicker RSB and a lesser decrease in the corneal stiffness in the SMILE procedure. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: After refractive surgery, RSB is predominant determinant of stiffness decreases, rather than the preserved anterior cornea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10029763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100297632023-03-22 Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study Hashemi, Hassan Roberts, Cynthia J. Elsheikh, Ahmed Mehravaran, Shiva Panahi, Parsa Asgari, Soheila Transl Vis Sci Technol Refractive Intervention PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in corneal stiffness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Age, gender, spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness (CCT)–matched cases undergoing SMILE with a 120-µ cap, FS-LASIK with a 110-µ flap, and PRK were enrolled. One-year change in the stress–strain index, stiffness parameter at first applanation, integrated inverse radius, deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm, and deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm were compared between the surgical groups by linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Within each surgical group, 120 eyes completed 1 year of follow-up. The residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness and (RSB/CCT(postop)) were 348.1 ± 35.0 (0.74), 375.4 ± 31.0 (0.77) and 426.7 ± 2 µm (0.88) after SMILE, FS-LASIK, and PRK, respectively. The 1-year change in all biomechanical indices was significant, except the stress–strain index with PRK (P = 0.884). The change in all indices with SMILE were significantly greater than with FS-LASIK and with PRK (all P < 0.01), except the deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm change between SMILE and FS-LASIK (P = 0.075). The changes in all indices with FS-LASIK were significantly greater than with PRK (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although SMILE preserves the greatest amount of anterior cornea with a cap thickness of 120 µ, this also produces the smallest RSB and the greatest decrease in stiffness. Thus, the RSB is shown to be the predominant determinant of stiffness decreases, rather than the preserved anterior cornea. We recommend using a thinner cap to achieve a thicker RSB and a lesser decrease in the corneal stiffness in the SMILE procedure. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: After refractive surgery, RSB is predominant determinant of stiffness decreases, rather than the preserved anterior cornea. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10029763/ /pubmed/36928130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.12 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Refractive Intervention
Hashemi, Hassan
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Elsheikh, Ahmed
Mehravaran, Shiva
Panahi, Parsa
Asgari, Soheila
Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
title Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
title_full Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
title_fullStr Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
title_short Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
title_sort corneal biomechanics after smile, femtosecond-assisted lasik, and photorefractive keratectomy: a matched comparison study
topic Refractive Intervention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.12
work_keys_str_mv AT hashemihassan cornealbiomechanicsaftersmilefemtosecondassistedlasikandphotorefractivekeratectomyamatchedcomparisonstudy
AT robertscynthiaj cornealbiomechanicsaftersmilefemtosecondassistedlasikandphotorefractivekeratectomyamatchedcomparisonstudy
AT elsheikhahmed cornealbiomechanicsaftersmilefemtosecondassistedlasikandphotorefractivekeratectomyamatchedcomparisonstudy
AT mehravaranshiva cornealbiomechanicsaftersmilefemtosecondassistedlasikandphotorefractivekeratectomyamatchedcomparisonstudy
AT panahiparsa cornealbiomechanicsaftersmilefemtosecondassistedlasikandphotorefractivekeratectomyamatchedcomparisonstudy
AT asgarisoheila cornealbiomechanicsaftersmilefemtosecondassistedlasikandphotorefractivekeratectomyamatchedcomparisonstudy