Cargando…

Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique

PURPOSE: To analyze visual outcomes and accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing flanged intrascleral IOL fixation. DESIGN: Case Series. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three patients who had undergone secondary IOL placement using flanged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malach, Daniel S, Guest, John Michael, Adam, Christopher, Joffe, Jonah, Le, Kim, Kim, Chaesik, Lin, Xihui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S389325
_version_ 1784910246238486528
author Malach, Daniel S
Guest, John Michael
Adam, Christopher
Joffe, Jonah
Le, Kim
Kim, Chaesik
Lin, Xihui
author_facet Malach, Daniel S
Guest, John Michael
Adam, Christopher
Joffe, Jonah
Le, Kim
Kim, Chaesik
Lin, Xihui
author_sort Malach, Daniel S
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze visual outcomes and accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing flanged intrascleral IOL fixation. DESIGN: Case Series. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three patients who had undergone secondary IOL placement using flanged intrascleral fixation technique. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative spherical equivalent based on manifest refraction. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved from 20/577 to 20/58. Overall, the actual refraction was 0.06 D more myopic than predicted. Holladay 2, Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) and Barrett Universal II resulted in mild myopic surprise (−0.55, −0.18 and −0.20 D). Haigis and Hill-RBF (Radial Basis Function) resulted in mild hyperopic surprise (+0.28 and +0.28 D). Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 were the most accurate (−0.02D and −0.08 D). CONCLUSION: Flanged intrascleral IOL fixation improved vision even in patients with other posterior segment pathologies. The effective lens positioning is likely similar to in-the-bag positioning. Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 formulas with in-the-bag calculations were the most accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10029932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100299322023-03-22 Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique Malach, Daniel S Guest, John Michael Adam, Christopher Joffe, Jonah Le, Kim Kim, Chaesik Lin, Xihui Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To analyze visual outcomes and accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing flanged intrascleral IOL fixation. DESIGN: Case Series. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three patients who had undergone secondary IOL placement using flanged intrascleral fixation technique. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative spherical equivalent based on manifest refraction. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved from 20/577 to 20/58. Overall, the actual refraction was 0.06 D more myopic than predicted. Holladay 2, Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) and Barrett Universal II resulted in mild myopic surprise (−0.55, −0.18 and −0.20 D). Haigis and Hill-RBF (Radial Basis Function) resulted in mild hyperopic surprise (+0.28 and +0.28 D). Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 were the most accurate (−0.02D and −0.08 D). CONCLUSION: Flanged intrascleral IOL fixation improved vision even in patients with other posterior segment pathologies. The effective lens positioning is likely similar to in-the-bag positioning. Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 formulas with in-the-bag calculations were the most accurate. Dove 2023-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10029932/ /pubmed/36960323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S389325 Text en © 2023 Malach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Malach, Daniel S
Guest, John Michael
Adam, Christopher
Joffe, Jonah
Le, Kim
Kim, Chaesik
Lin, Xihui
Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
title Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
title_full Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
title_fullStr Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
title_short Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
title_sort intraocular lens formula comparison of flanged intrascleral intraocular lens fixation with double needle technique
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S389325
work_keys_str_mv AT malachdaniels intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique
AT guestjohnmichael intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique
AT adamchristopher intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique
AT joffejonah intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique
AT lekim intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique
AT kimchaesik intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique
AT linxihui intraocularlensformulacomparisonofflangedintrascleralintraocularlensfixationwithdoubleneedletechnique